Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IModern Indian HistoryPractice question

Recommendations of the Simon Commission

Critically analyse the recommendations of the Simon Commission. To what extent did they address Indian political aspirations?

Critically analyse~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by contextualising the appointment of the Simon Commission under the Government of India Act 1919 and its submission in 1930. Outline its main constitutional recommendations regarding provincial autonomy, the central executive, electorates, and territorial reorganisations. Conclude with a critical evaluation assessing why it failed to address Indian aspirations while noting its influence on the Government of India Act 1935.

Model answer

320 words

Introduction

Appointed in 1927 under Sir John Simon to review the working of the Government of India Act 1919, the Indian Statutory Commission (popularly known as the Simon Commission) submitted its report in May 1930. Its proposals aimed to reshape India's administrative architecture but sparked widespread political hostility across the country.

Key Recommendations of the Commission

  • Provincial Administration: Recommended the abolition of dyarchy in the provinces and the establishment of 'provincial autonomy', placing ministerial portfolios under ministers responsible to provincial legislatures.
  • Central Government: Rejected the introduction of parliamentary responsibility at the Centre. The Governor-General retained overarching discretionary authority, including the power to appoint cabinet members independently.
  • Electoral System: Retained and advocated the extension of communal electorates for religious minorities and special representation for depressed classes.
  • Territorial Reorganisation: Proposed the administrative separation of Burma from British India and the detachment of Sindh from the Bombay Presidency.

Extent to Which It Addressed Indian Political Aspirations

The Commission largely failed to satisfy contemporary Indian political aspirations, resulting in unprecedented national resistance:

  • All-White Composition: The exclusion of Indian members from a body tasked with determining India's constitutional future was seen as a profound insult to national self-respect, leading to unanimous boycott calls initiated at the 1927 Madras Congress Session.
  • Superficial Autonomy: While provincial dyarchy was dismantled, expansive emergency and discretionary veto powers granted to provincial Governors undermined genuine self-governance.
  • Denial of Dominion Status: The report completely bypassed the demand for immediate Dominion Status—articulated in the 1928 Nehru Report—and lagged far behind the goal of Poorna Swaraj (Complete Independence) adopted at Lahore in 1929.
  • Entrenchment of Communalism: Perpetuating and expanding separate electorates reinforced the policy of divide-and-rule, subverting nationalist aspirations for a unified, secular democratic polity.

Conclusion

Though universally condemned by Indian leaders and acting as a major trigger for the Civil Disobedience Movement, the Simon Commission's structural framework formed the conceptual foundation for the Round Table Conferences and substantially shaped the Government of India Act, 1935.

Key facts to remember

definition
Dyarchy

A system of dual governance introduced by the Government of India Act 1919 in the provinces, dividing executive subjects into 'transferred' (administered by elected ministers) and 'reserved' (controlled directly by the Governor and his executive council).

scheme
Government of India Act 1919 Review Mandate

Section 84A of the 1919 Act mandated the appointment of a statutory commission after ten years to inquire into the working of the system of government and the development of representative institutions in British India.

example
Nehru Report (1928)

Drafted by an All-Parties Conference chaired by Motilal Nehru as a direct answer to the British challenge that Indians could not draft a viable constitution, asserting the demand for Dominion Status.

Frequently asked questions

Why was the Simon Commission boycotted by Indian leaders?

It was boycotted primarily because all seven of its members were British, denying Indians the right to deliberate upon their own constitutional destiny and sovereignty.

← All questions on this topic (28)