UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IConstitutionPractice question

Significance and Amendability of the Preamble

Discuss the significance of the Preamble to the Constitution of India. Can it be amended? If yes, what are the limitations on the amending power of Parliament in this regard?

Discuss~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by defining the Preamble and highlighting its origin in the Objectives Resolution. Detail its multifaceted significance as a philosophical compass and interpretative tool, explain the judicial evolution of its amendability through landmark judgments, examine the limitations imposed by the Basic Structure Doctrine, and conclude with its role in upholding constitutional morality.

Model answer

424 words

Introduction

The Preamble, famously described by N.A. Palkhivala as the 'identity card of the Constitution', encapsulates the foundational philosophy and guiding values of the Indian republic. Originating from Jawaharlal Nehru's historic 'Objectives Resolution' adopted in 1947, it serves as the ideological compass for the entire constitutional structure.

Significance of the Preamble

  • Philosophical Compass: It enshrines the core ideals of the nation—Justice, Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity—while defining the fundamental character of the Indian State as a Sovereign, Socialist, Secular, Democratic, Republic.
  • Interpretative Aid for Judiciary: It guides the courts in resolving textual ambiguities within constitutional provisions. For instance, in Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980), the Supreme Court relied on the Preamble to harmonize Fundamental Rights with Directive Principles of State Policy.
  • Legal Status and Nature: The Preamble is non-justiciable, meaning its provisions cannot be directly enforced in courts of law. Furthermore, it is neither a direct source of legislative power nor a limitation upon substantive legislative enactments.

Amendability and Judicial Evolution

The question of whether the Preamble can be amended under Article 368 has undergone significant judicial evolution:

  • Berubari Union Case (1960): The Supreme Court held that the Preamble is not an integral part of the Constitution and, therefore, cannot be amended under Article 368.
  • Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): Overruling the Berubari precedent, the landmark 13-judge bench declared that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and is amendable under Article 368.
  • LIC of India Case (1995): The Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Preamble is an indispensable and integral part of the constitutional scheme.
  • Practical Application: The Preamble has been amended only once, via the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act (1976), which incorporated the terms 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity'.

Limitations on the Amending Power of Parliament

Although Parliament enjoys constituent power to amend the Preamble, this authority is not absolute:

  • Basic Structure Doctrine: In Kesavananda Bharati (1973), the Supreme Court established that Parliament's amending power under Article 368 cannot alter, damage, or destroy the basic structure or essential features embedded in the Preamble.
  • Immutable Ideals: Core tenets such as secularism, democracy, republicanism, and judicial review constitute inviolable parts of the basic structure (reaffirmed in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India, 1994).
  • Judicial Review: Any constitutional amendment to the Preamble that undermines its foundational philosophy remains subject to strict judicial scrutiny and can be declared ultra vires.

Conclusion

While the Preamble can be amended to broaden its socio-economic vision, its core philosophy remains immutable. It stands as a permanent beacon guiding constitutional interpretation, governance, and the preservation of India's democratic ethos.

Key facts to remember

quote
Eminent jurist N.A. Palkhivala described the Preamble as the 'identity card of the Constitution'.
N.A. Palkhivala on the Preamble
case study
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

A 13-judge bench ruled that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and can be amended under Article 368, provided such amendments do not alter its basic structure.

scheme
42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976

The only amendment made to the Preamble to date, which added the words 'Socialist', 'Secular', and 'Integrity' to its text.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Preamble enforceable in a court of law?

No, the Preamble is non-justiciable. It cannot be directly enforced in courts of law and does not grant substantive powers or impose enforceable restrictions on the legislature.