Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IEnvironment and EcologyPractice question

Multi-Stakeholder Approach in Biodiversity Conservation

Conservation of biodiversity requires a multi-stakeholder approach involving society, state and market. Discuss how far the statement is true.

Discuss~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by contextualising biodiversity conservation within global and national targets, explaining the theoretical necessity of a multi-stakeholder model. Then, analyze how the state, market, and society contribute complementarily, followed by a critical assessment of the frictions, implementation gaps, and systemic limitations among these actors. Conclude with a forward-looking roadmap to reconcile economic, administrative, and community interests.

Model answer

433 words

Introduction

Achieving critical conservation targets, such as the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) 30x30 target, necessitates a synergistic multi-stakeholder approach. Integrating the regulatory authority of the state, the financial and innovative leverage of the market, and the grassroots stewardship of society provides a holistic model for ecological preservation, though practical frictions frequently limit its efficacy on the ground.

The Multi-Stakeholder Synergy

Each stakeholder provides unique structural strengths that are essential for long-term ecological conservation:

  • State: Provides statutory enforcement, designated protected area networks, and national policy coordination through frameworks like the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (amended in 2022) and the Biological Diversity Act, 2002.
  • Market: Mobilizes critical conservation capital through instruments like Sovereign Green Bonds and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) allocations, while operationalizing Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) mechanisms under statutory regimes.
  • Society: Anchors grassroots community conservation, exemplified by the Bishnoi community's protection of the Blackbuck, and preserves traditional ecological knowledge documented through the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL).

How Far is the Statement True? (Critical Limitations and Frictions)

While the multi-stakeholder framework is theoretically indispensable, systemic implementation gaps and divergent incentives frequently undermine its success:

  • Market Failures and Greenwashing: Profit-oriented entities frequently prioritize commercial revenue over ecological integrity, pushing linear infrastructure and extraction projects into fragile ecosystems such as the Western Ghats Eco-Sensitive Zones. Furthermore, deceptive eco-branding and voluntary disclosures without third-party verification dilute authentic accountability.
  • State-Community Friction: Centralized, bureaucratic conservation models often conflict with indigenous land and resource rights. This friction is evident in tensions between developmental clearances granted under the Forest Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2023 and the statutory requirement for community consent under the Forest Rights Act, 2006.
  • Community Capacity Deficits: Grassroots institutions such as local Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs) regularly face severe financial shortages and lack the technical training required to scientifically document People's Biodiversity Registers (PBRs) or effectively negotiate equitable benefit-sharing contracts with commercial conglomerates.

Way Forward

To realize the true potential of a multi-stakeholder model, conservation governance must move beyond formal compliance toward structural alignment:

  • Empowering Local Institutions: Devolving statutory autonomy and dedicated financial resources to Biodiversity Management Committees ensures genuine democratic decentralization.
  • Regulating Market Practices: Enforcing strict green-bond taxonomy and penalizing corporate greenwashing via rigorous MoEFCC and regulatory oversight.
  • Ensuring Prior Informed Consent: Harmonizing developmental clearances with tribal and forest-dweller rights to create shared stakes in ecological stewardship.

Conclusion

The premise that biodiversity conservation demands a multi-stakeholder approach is inherently sound, as no single actor possesses the comprehensive mandate, capital, and local presence required. However, its ultimate success hinges on eliminating power asymmetries, enforcing accountability on market players, and placing indigenous and local communities at the core of decision-making.

Key facts to remember

definition
KMGBF 30x30 Target

A global target under the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework aiming to protect and conserve at least 30% of terrestrial, inland water, and coastal and marine areas by 2030.

scheme
Biological Diversity Act, 2002

An Indian Act enacted to conserve biological diversity, promote sustainable use of its components, and ensure fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising out of genetic resources and traditional knowledge.

example
Bishnoi Community's Conservation Ethic

The Bishnoi community in Rajasthan actively protects the Blackbuck and Khejri trees as an intrinsic religious duty, demonstrating effective community-led conservation.

Frequently asked questions

What are Biodiversity Management Committees (BMCs)?

BMCs are statutory bodies constituted by local government institutions under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, responsible for preparing People's Biodiversity Registers and managing local bioresources.

← All questions on this topic (19)