Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIConstitutionPractice question

Supreme Court as Guardian of Constitution and Fundamental Rights

The Supreme Court is not merely the highest court of appeal but also the guardian of the Constitution and Fundamental Rights. Discuss the constitutional position, powers, and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

Discuss~250 words3 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Begin by introducing the constitutional establishment of the Supreme Court under Part V and its role as the apex judicial institution. Detail its role as the guardian of the Constitution and Fundamental Rights via judicial review and writ jurisdiction, and systematically examine its various jurisdictions and plenary powers. Conclude by suggesting structural measures like a National Court of Appeal to preserve its constitutional focus.

Model answer

496 words

Introduction

The Supreme Court of India, established under Articles 124 to 147 in Part V of the Constitution, stands at the apex of a unified and integrated judicial hierarchy. Far beyond functioning as a standard appellate court of last resort, it serves as the ultimate interpreter of the constitutional document, the arbiter of federal disputes, and the primary protector of citizens' fundamental freedoms.

Guardian of the Constitution and Fundamental Rights

The Constitution entrusts the Supreme Court with an extraordinary responsibility to safeguard constitutionalism and individual liberties:

  • Guarantor of Fundamental Rights (Article 32): The Supreme Court is designated as the protector and guarantor of Part III rights. It possesses the authority to issue prerogative writs—habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari—for their enforcement. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the 'very soul and the very heart' of the Constitution.
  • Power of Judicial Review (Article 13): The Court evaluates the constitutional validity of legislative enactments and executive orders, invalidating any law that infringes upon Fundamental Rights. Through the Basic Structure doctrine enunciated in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973), the Court established itself as the final bulwark against constitutional subversion.
  • Expansive Human Rights Jurisprudence: Through dynamic interpretation of Article 21, the Court transformed procedural guarantees into substantive protections, recognizing essential rights such as the right to live with dignity in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) and informational privacy in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017).

Constitutional Powers and Jurisdictions

The Constitution confers wide-ranging jurisdictions that reinforce the Court's paramount position in the Indian polity:

  • Original Federal Jurisdiction (Article 131): Exclusive jurisdiction to adjudicate disputes between the Government of India and one or more States, or between two or more States, ensuring federal equilibrium.
  • Appellate Jurisdiction (Articles 132–136): Entertains appeals from High Courts concerning substantial questions of constitutional interpretation, civil disputes, and criminal convictions. Under Article 136, it possesses plenary discretion to grant Special Leave to Appeal against any judgment, decree, or order of any court or tribunal in the territory of India.
  • Advisory Jurisdiction (Article 143): Empowers the President of India to refer questions of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court for its authoritative advisory opinion.
  • Plenary Power to do Complete Justice (Article 142): Bestows inherent authority on the Court to pass any order, decree, or direction necessary for doing 'complete justice' in any cause or matter pending before it.
  • Court of Record and Review Powers (Articles 129 & 137): Operates as a Court of Record with powers to punish for its contempt, and retains the competence to review any judgment pronounced or order made by it to rectify manifest errors.

Conclusion

While the Supreme Court has zealously safeguarded constitutional supremacy and fundamental freedoms, an overwhelming backlog of routine statutory appeals threatens to dilute its core constitutional function. Implementing systemic reforms, such as establishing regional benches or a National Court of Appeal, is imperative to allow the apex court to dedicate its institutional capacity primarily to constitutional adjudication.

Key facts to remember

quote
“If I was asked to name any particular article in this Constitution as the most important—an article without which this Constitution would be a nullity—I could not refer to any other article except this one. It is the very soul of the Constitution and the very heart of it.”
— Dr. B.R. Ambedkar on Article 32
case study
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)

The Supreme Court formulated the Basic Structure doctrine, ruling that while Parliament has wide powers to amend the Constitution under Article 368, it cannot alter its foundational pillars, solidifying the judiciary's role as the final constitutional guardian.

definition
Article 142 (Complete Justice)

A unique constitutional provision enabling the Supreme Court to pass any decree or make any order necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter before it, transcending ordinary statutory limits.

Frequently asked questions

What is the rationale behind creating a National Court of Appeal?

A National Court of Appeal is proposed to handle routine civil, criminal, and commercial appeals from High Courts, enabling the Supreme Court to function strictly as a specialized constitutional court and significantly reducing pendency.

← All questions on this topic (64)