Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIGovernancePractice question

Effectiveness of Lokpal and Lokayukta in Combating Corruption

"Institutions like Lokpal and Lokayukta were meant to ensure accountability, yet they struggle with political interference and limited effectiveness." Critically assess their role in tackling corruption.

Critically assess~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Introduce the statutory mandate of Lokpal and Lokayukta under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. Highlight their statutory powers and intended role in enforcing public probity, followed by a critical assessment of structural and operational challenges using empirical and judicial citations. Conclude with a forward-looking reform path based on the Second Administrative Reforms Commission recommendations.

Model answer

287 words

Introduction

Established under the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013, these statutory ombudsmen were instituted to institutionalise administrative probity and eliminate corruption in governance. While the Lokpal oversees Union functionaries including the Prime Minister and Union Ministers, Section 63 mandates States to establish Lokayuktas to scrutinise State-level authorities, including Chief Ministers.

Role in Tackling Corruption

  • Broad Statutory Jurisdiction: Brings top-tier public officials under legal scrutiny, bridging long-standing gaps in political and bureaucratic accountability.
  • Supervisory Authority (Section 20): Vests the Lokpal with powers of superintendence and direction over investigative agencies, including the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), for complaints referred by it.
  • Transparency through Asset Declarations (Section 44): Mandates periodic disclosure of assets and liabilities by public servants to detect illicit enrichment.

Structural Bottlenecks and Limited Effectiveness

  • Subdued Prosecution Outcomes: Since inception, out of approximately 6,900 complaints received, prosecution sanction was granted in only a handful of cases, highlighting an execution deficit.
  • Procedural Filtering: Parliamentary committees have flagged that roughly 90% of complaints are rejected at preliminary stages due to technical format discrepancies rather than evaluated on substantive merits.
  • Absence of Independent Cadre: Lacking an independent investigative wing and suo motu powers, these institutions remain heavily dependent on government-controlled mechanisms like the CBI and State police.
  • Executive Influence and Appointment Delays: Executive preponderance in the selection committee risks partisan capture; the Supreme Court in Common Cause v. Union of India had to repeatedly intervene to address protracted vacancies.
  • Chilling Effect on Whistleblowers: Stringent penal provisions under Section 46 for complaints deemed 'false and frivolous' inadvertently disincentivise bonafide citizens and whistleblowers.

Conclusion

To transition from passive supervisory entities into effective watchdogs, Lokpal and Lokayuktas require independent investigative machinery, operational autonomy, and suo motu powers as envisaged by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.

Key facts to remember

scheme
Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013

An Act to provide for the establishment of a body of Lokpal for the Union and Lokayukta for States to inquire into allegations of corruption against certain public functionaries.

statistic

Around 90% of citizen complaints to the Lokpal have historically been rejected at the threshold due to non-adherence to the prescribed complaint format rather than substantive investigation.

— Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee
case study
Common Cause v. Union of India

The Supreme Court reprimanded the Union government for continuous delays in appointing the Lokpal and ruled that the statutory body could function even in the absence of a recognised Leader of Opposition in the selection panel.

Frequently asked questions

Does the Lokpal have its own independent investigative wing?

Although the Act envisions an Inquiry Wing and a Prosecution Wing, the Lokpal largely relies on external executive agencies such as the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) for investigations.

← All questions on this topic (65)