Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsGeneral Studies Paper IIIndian PolityPractice question

Independence of the Indian Judiciary

Examine the constitutional safeguards that ensure the independence of the Indian Judiciary.

Examine~250 words2 min readmedium
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Introduce the concept of judicial independence and its status as a core facet of the Constitution's basic structure. Detail the explicit constitutional and institutional safeguards provided for the higher judiciary, categorising them into tenure, financial security, jurisdictional autonomy, and appointment processes. Conclude with measures needed to balance independence with transparency and accountability.

Model answer

394 words

Introduction

Judicial independence is a foundational pillar of the Indian constitutional order, recognized as part of the 'Basic Structure' doctrine in the NJAC Case (2015). It ensures the supremacy of the Constitution, protects fundamental rights against executive and legislative encroachment, and maintains institutional checks and balances indispensable to a constitutional democracy.

Constitutional Provisions Safeguarding Independence

  • Security of Tenure: Judges of the Supreme Court (Article 124) and High Courts (Article 217) enjoy guaranteed tenure. They can only be removed by the President following an address by each House of Parliament supported by a special majority, strictly on grounds of 'proved misbehaviour or incapacity' under the procedure regulated by the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968.
  • Financial Shield and Non-Votable Expenditure: Under Articles 125 and 221, the salaries, allowances, and pensions of judges cannot be varied to their disadvantage during their tenure. Furthermore, administrative expenses, including judges' salaries, are charged upon the Consolidated Fund of India (Article 146) or State (Article 229), rendering them non-votable by legislatures.
  • Immunity of Judicial Conduct: The Constitution strictly prohibits discussions in Parliament (Article 121) or State Legislatures (Article 211) regarding the conduct of judges in the discharge of their duties, except upon a motion for their removal.
  • Restriction on Post-Retirement Practice: Retired Supreme Court judges are barred from pleading or acting before any court or authority within India (Article 124(7)), insulating them from future professional patronage. For High Court judges, post-retirement practice is restricted to courts other than the ones where they served permanently (Article 220).
  • Power to Punish for Contempt: As Courts of Record, the Supreme Court (Article 129) and High Courts (Article 215) possess the inherent authority to punish for contempt of court, deterring unsubstantiated allegations and actions that lower judicial authority.

Institutional and Functional Protections

  • Primacy in Judicial Appointments: Through judicial interpretation in the Second Judges Case (1993) and Third Judges Case (1998), the Collegium system was established to minimize executive predominance in judicial selections and transfers.
  • Administrative and Rule-Making Autonomy: The Supreme Court exercises full authority in appointing its administrative staff and determining rules for its own procedures and practices under Articles 145 and 146.

Conclusion

While these constitutional protections robustly insulate the higher judiciary from external interference, maintaining public trust requires institutional accountability. Finalizing a revised Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) and introducing a statutory cooling-off period before post-retirement executive appointments will ensure that independence is harmonized with operational transparency.

Key facts to remember

definition
Judicial Independence

The constitutional principle ensuring that judges can decide disputes impartially and freely, without undue influence, pressure, or control from the executive, legislature, or private interests.

case study
NJAC Case (2015)

In Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association v. Union of India, the Supreme Court struck down the 99th Constitutional Amendment Act and the National Judicial Appointments Commission, reaffirming that judicial primacy in appointments is an essential component of the basic structure.

scheme
Judges Inquiry Act, 1968

A statute governing the procedure for investigating charges of misbehaviour or incapacity against Supreme Court and High Court judges before parliamentary impeachment proceedings.

Frequently asked questions

Why are judicial expenses charged on the Consolidated Fund?

Charging expenses on the Consolidated Fund ensures that judicial operational budgets, salaries, and pensions are non-votable by Parliament or state legislatures, preventing fiscal leverage over the judiciary.

← All questions on this topic (197)