UPSC MainsLaw (Optional)International RelationsPractice question

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties Framework

1. Explain the principle of 'Jus cogens' with reference to 'Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties, 1969'. 2. Reservation in multilateral treaty excludes or modifies the legal effect of certain provisions of a treaty in its application to that state. Explain the circumstances under which reservations in treaties are permissible under international law. 3. What are the various steps involved for concluding an international treaty and bringing it into force? 4. Discuss the provisions relating to amendment and modification of treaties under VCLT, 1969.

ExplainDiscuss~250 words5 min readhard
Attempt it first, timed · optional

Write the answer on paper, as in the exam. Start the timer, keep to the word target.

00:00/ 11 min · 250 words

Done writing? Photograph the sheet and see how it scores against this model answer, with feedback on what to fix.

Upload your answer sheet

How to approach

Structure the response into four distinct thematic sections corresponding to the sub-questions. Address Jus cogens under Articles 53 and 64 with jurisprudence, evaluate the permissibility of reservations under Article 19 alongside the Genocide Convention advisory opinion, enumerate the sequential steps of treaty formation and entry into force under Articles 7–24 and 80, and contrast multilateral amendment (Articles 39–40) with inter se modification (Article 41).

Model answer

844 words

Introduction

The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), 1969, codified under the auspices of the International Law Commission, serves as the fundamental constitutional framework governing modern treaty relations. It establishes codified standards regulating state consent, the hierarchy of international legal norms, flexibility through reservations, and procedures for concluding, amending, and modifying international agreements.

1. Principle of 'Jus Cogens' under VCLT, 1969

The doctrine of jus cogens (peremptory norms of general international law) represents higher-order norms from which no derogation is permitted by sovereign states, acting as an overarching constraint on absolute treaty-making power.

  • Substantive Definition and Voidness ab initio (Article 53): Article 53 defines a peremptory norm as a rule accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole, which can be modified only by a subsequent norm having the same character. Any treaty that conflicts with an existing norm of jus cogens at the time of its conclusion is void ab initio.
  • Emergence of New Peremptory Norms (Article 64 - Jus Cogens Superveniens): Under Article 64, if a new peremptory norm of general international law emerges, any existing treaty that is in conflict with that norm becomes void and terminates automatically.
  • Judicial Confirmation: In the Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Rwanda, 2006) case, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) affirmed the non-derogable, peremptory character of jus cogens norms, identifying prohibitions against genocide, torture, and unlawful use of force as quintessential examples.

2. Permissibility of Reservations in Multilateral Treaties

Article 2(1)(d) defines a 'reservation' as a unilateral statement made by a state when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving, or acceding to a treaty, whereby it purports to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain treaty provisions in their application to that state. Permissibility is regulated under Article 19 of the VCLT:

  • Express Prohibition: A reservation is impermissible if explicitly prohibited by the treaty itself (Article 19(a)).
  • Limited Permissible Categories: If the treaty provides that only specified reservations—which do not include the reservation in question—may be made, it is inadmissible (Article 19(b)).
  • Compatibility with Object and Purpose: In cases where the treaty is silent, Article 19(c) disallows reservations incompatible with the treaty's object and purpose. This principle originated from the landmark ICJ Advisory Opinion in Reservations to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1951), balancing universality of participation against the preservation of treaty integrity.

3. Steps for Concluding and Bringing an International Treaty into Force

The conclusion and operationalisation of a treaty follows a sequential multilateral process governed by Articles 7 to 24 and Article 80 of the VCLT:

  • Full Powers and Representation (Article 7): State representatives must produce 'full powers' granting credentials to negotiate, adopt, or authenticate a treaty, unless dispensed with by virtue of high office (Heads of State, Heads of Government, Foreign Ministers).
  • Negotiation and Adoption of the Text (Article 9): The text is adopted by the consent of all negotiating states, or by a two-thirds majority at an international conference, unless an alternative voting rule is agreed upon.
  • Authentication of the Text (Article 10): The text is established as definitive and authentic through signature, signature ad referendum, or initialing.
  • Expression of Consent to be Bound (Articles 11–15): States express formal consent through signature, exchange of instruments, ratification, acceptance, approval, or accession.
  • Entry into Force (Article 24): A treaty enters into force upon satisfying conditions specified in the text (such as reaching a requisite threshold of ratifications) or upon mutual agreement of all negotiating states.
  • Registration and Publication (Article 80): Following entry into force, treaties must be transmitted to the United Nations Secretariat for registration and publication under Article 102 of the UN Charter.

4. Amendment and Modification of Treaties

The VCLT draws a clear distinction between the formal alteration of a treaty applying to all parties ('amendment') and private reciprocal adjustments among select parties ('modification'):

  • General Amendment Rule (Article 39): Treaties may be amended by agreement between the parties, with the rules of Part II applying to such agreements unless provided otherwise.
  • Multilateral Treaty Amendments (Article 40): Any proposal to amend a multilateral treaty must be notified to all contracting states, each having the right to participate in negotiation and adoption. An amending agreement does not bind states that do not accept it; bilateral relations between amending and non-amending parties continue to be governed by the unamended treaty.
  • Modification Inter Se (Article 41): Two or more parties to a multilateral treaty may conclude an agreement to modify the treaty between themselves alone, provided the treaty explicitly allows it, or if not prohibited, provided such modification does not affect the enjoyment of rights or performance of obligations by other parties, and does not relate to a provision whose derogation is incompatible with the effective execution of the object and purpose of the treaty as a whole.

Conclusion

The VCLT, 1969 strikes an enduring equilibrium between the sovereignty of states through flexible mechanisms like reservations and modifications, and the preservation of global public order through peremptory norms (jus cogens) and the pacta sunt servanda doctrine.

Key facts to remember

definition
Jus Cogens

A peremptory norm of general international law accepted and recognized by the international community of states as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted, rendering conflicting treaties void.

definition
Reservation (Treaties)

A unilateral statement made by a state when signing or ratifying a treaty, intended to exclude or modify the legal effect of specific provisions in their application to that state.

case study
Genocide Convention Advisory Opinion (ICJ, 1951)

The International Court of Justice ruled that reservations to multilateral humanitarian conventions are permissible provided they remain compatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, laying the groundwork for Article 19(c) of the VCLT.

case study
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Rwanda, ICJ 2006)

The ICJ expressly recognized the peremptory status of the prohibition against genocide under jus cogens, confirming its non-derogable standing in public international law.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between amendment and modification under the VCLT?

An amendment (Articles 39–40) formally alters treaty provisions for all contracting parties upon notification, whereas a modification (Article 41) is an inter se agreement altering terms solely between select parties without affecting third-party rights or the treaty's core purpose.