UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-I201112 Marks150 Words
Q13.

Benefits and potential drawbacks of 'cash-transfers' to 'Below Poverty Line' (BPL) households.

How to Approach

This question requires a balanced discussion of the pros and cons of cash transfers to BPL households. The answer should begin by defining cash transfers and their rationale, then detail the benefits (poverty reduction, improved health/education, economic multiplier effect). Subsequently, it should address the drawbacks (leakage, inflation, dependency, exclusion errors). A structured approach using headings and bullet points will enhance clarity. Conclude with a nuanced perspective on the role of cash transfers within a broader social safety net.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Cash transfers, direct payments made to individuals or households, have emerged as a prominent tool in poverty alleviation strategies globally, and particularly in India. Rooted in the idea of providing a safety net and enhancing purchasing power, these transfers aim to address immediate needs and promote human capital development. The Indian government has implemented several cash transfer schemes, notably the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA) and the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY), which incorporate direct benefit transfer (DBT). However, the efficacy and potential downsides of relying heavily on cash transfers to BPL households remain a subject of debate.

Benefits of Cash Transfers to BPL Households

Cash transfers offer several potential advantages:

  • Poverty Reduction: Direct cash assistance increases household income, enabling families to meet basic needs like food, clothing, and shelter. Studies have shown a correlation between cash transfers and reduced poverty rates.
  • Improved Health and Education Outcomes: Increased income allows families to invest in healthcare and education for their children, leading to better health indicators and school enrollment rates. For example, conditional cash transfer programs link payments to school attendance or health check-ups.
  • Economic Multiplier Effect: Cash received by BPL households is likely to be spent locally, stimulating demand and boosting economic activity in the informal sector.
  • Reduced Administrative Costs: Compared to in-kind transfers (e.g., food subsidies), cash transfers can be more efficient to administer, reducing leakage and corruption. DBT under PMJDY exemplifies this.
  • Empowerment and Dignity: Cash transfers empower recipients by giving them the autonomy to decide how to best utilize the funds, fostering a sense of dignity and agency.

Potential Drawbacks of Cash Transfers to BPL Households

Despite the benefits, cash transfers are not without their limitations:

  • Leakage and Corruption: Despite DBT, there is still a risk of funds being diverted due to corruption or errors in beneficiary identification. The ‘ghost beneficiary’ problem remains a challenge.
  • Inflationary Pressures: A sudden increase in demand without a corresponding increase in supply can lead to inflation, eroding the real value of the cash transfers. This is particularly concerning in areas with limited market infrastructure.
  • Dependency and Disincentive to Work: Critics argue that cash transfers can create dependency and discourage individuals from seeking employment. However, evidence on this is mixed, and well-designed programs often include work requirements or incentives.
  • Exclusion Errors: Identifying truly deserving beneficiaries can be challenging, leading to exclusion errors where eligible households are left out of the program. The BPL list itself has been criticized for its inaccuracies.
  • Misuse of Funds: There is a possibility that cash transfers may be used for non-essential items like alcohol or tobacco, rather than for improving living standards.

Addressing the Drawbacks

Several measures can be taken to mitigate the drawbacks of cash transfers:

  • Strengthening Beneficiary Identification: Utilizing robust data sources like the Socio-Economic Caste Census (SECC) 2011 and Aadhaar-linked databases to improve the accuracy of beneficiary lists.
  • Conditional Cash Transfers: Linking transfers to specific behaviors like school attendance or health check-ups to promote human capital development.
  • Financial Literacy Programs: Providing financial literacy training to recipients to help them manage their funds effectively.
  • Supply-Side Interventions: Investing in infrastructure and agricultural productivity to increase the supply of goods and services, mitigating inflationary pressures.
  • Regular Monitoring and Evaluation: Conducting regular monitoring and evaluation of cash transfer programs to identify and address implementation challenges.
Benefit Drawback Mitigation Strategy
Poverty Reduction Leakage & Corruption Aadhaar-linked DBT, Grievance Redressal Mechanisms
Improved Health/Education Dependency Conditional Cash Transfers, Skill Development Programs
Economic Multiplier Inflation Supply-Side Interventions, Infrastructure Development

Conclusion

Cash transfers represent a valuable tool in the fight against poverty, offering immediate relief and the potential to improve human capital. However, they are not a panacea. Their effectiveness hinges on careful design, robust implementation, and complementary policies that address structural issues like unemployment and lack of access to essential services. A holistic approach, integrating cash transfers with investments in education, healthcare, and infrastructure, is crucial for achieving sustainable and inclusive development. The future of cash transfers lies in leveraging technology and data analytics to enhance targeting, reduce leakage, and maximize their impact.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT)
A system where government subsidies and benefits are directly transferred to the bank accounts of beneficiaries, eliminating intermediaries and reducing leakage.
Exclusion Error
A type of error in social welfare programs where eligible individuals or households are incorrectly excluded from receiving benefits.

Key Statistics

As of December 2023, DBT has facilitated the transfer of over ₹9.02 lakh crore to beneficiaries across various schemes (Source: Press Information Bureau, Government of India).

Source: Press Information Bureau, Government of India

According to a 2022 study by the World Bank, approximately 20-30% of intended beneficiaries are often excluded from social assistance programs in India due to identification and administrative challenges.

Source: World Bank (Knowledge cutoff: 2023)

Examples

MGNREGA

The Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (2005) provides 100 days of wage employment to rural households, with wages often disbursed through DBT, demonstrating a large-scale cash transfer program.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are cash transfers always more effective than in-kind transfers?

Not necessarily. In situations where markets are underdeveloped or access to goods and services is limited, in-kind transfers (like food subsidies) may be more effective in ensuring that beneficiaries receive essential necessities.