UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-I20115 Marks50 Words
Q27.

The Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach to sanitation.

How to Approach

This question requires a concise yet comprehensive understanding of the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach. The answer should define CLTS, explain its key principles and methodology, highlight its successes and challenges, and briefly mention its evolution. Structure the answer by first defining CLTS, then detailing its process, followed by its impact and limitations. Focus on the ‘community-led’ aspect and how it differs from traditional sanitation approaches.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is an approach to improving sanitation that aims to trigger a sustained, community-wide change in sanitation behaviour. Unlike traditional sanitation programs that focus on providing subsidies for toilets, CLTS emphasizes collective action and self-responsibility. Initiated in Bangladesh in 2000 by Kamal Kar, CLTS gained prominence as a cost-effective and scalable solution to address the global sanitation crisis, particularly in rural areas where open defecation is prevalent. It moves away from a supply-driven approach to a demand-driven one, empowering communities to analyze their sanitation situation and collectively find solutions.

Understanding the CLTS Approach

CLTS is based on the premise that shame and disgust, rather than subsidies, are the most powerful motivators for behaviour change. The core principle is to trigger a ‘total sanitation’ campaign, where the entire community commits to becoming open defecation free (ODF). This is achieved through a participatory process that involves:

  • Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA): Facilitators guide the community through a series of exercises to analyze their current sanitation practices, the consequences of open defecation (health, dignity, economic), and the potential benefits of improved sanitation.
  • Shame and Disgust Mapping: Communities map areas where people defecate, highlighting the proximity to food, water sources, and homes. This visually demonstrates the health risks and indignity associated with open defecation.
  • Collective Action Planning: Once the community understands the problem, they collectively plan and implement solutions, including building toilets, improving hygiene practices, and establishing mechanisms for sustaining ODF status.

Key Features & Methodology

CLTS differs significantly from traditional sanitation approaches in several ways:

Feature Traditional Approach CLTS Approach
Focus Supply-driven (toilet construction) Demand-driven (behaviour change)
Role of Community Passive recipient Active participant and leader
Subsidies Often heavily subsidized Minimal or no subsidies
Technology Focus on specific toilet technologies Community chooses appropriate technologies

Impact and Successes

CLTS has been implemented in over 50 countries across Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Some notable successes include:

  • Bangladesh: Where CLTS originated, it has contributed to a significant reduction in open defecation rates.
  • India: The Swachh Bharat Mission (SBM) – Gramin, launched in 2014, heavily incorporated CLTS principles, leading to the declaration of ODF status for many districts and states. (Statistic: As of December 2023, India has declared itself ODF, though sustaining ODF status remains a challenge - Source: Ministry of Jal Shakti, Government of India)
  • Mozambique: CLTS helped achieve rapid progress in sanitation coverage in rural areas.

Challenges and Limitations

Despite its successes, CLTS faces several challenges:

  • Sustainability: Maintaining ODF status requires ongoing behaviour change communication and monitoring.
  • Equity: Vulnerable groups (e.g., the elderly, disabled) may be left behind if their needs are not addressed.
  • Technical Support: Communities may require technical assistance in constructing safe and durable toilets.
  • Focus on Toilet Construction: Sometimes, the focus shifts solely to toilet construction, neglecting other aspects of sanitation like handwashing and waste management.

Recent adaptations of CLTS, such as Community-Led Total Sanitation and Hygiene (CLTSH), address these limitations by integrating hygiene promotion and behaviour change communication into the process.

Conclusion

The CLTS approach represents a paradigm shift in sanitation programming, emphasizing community ownership and collective action. While it has proven effective in triggering rapid sanitation improvements, sustaining these gains requires a holistic approach that addresses equity, technical support, and long-term behaviour change. Continued innovation and adaptation of CLTS principles, like the integration of hygiene and waste management, are crucial for achieving universal sanitation coverage and improving public health.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Open Defecation Free (ODF)
A community is declared ODF when no faeces are seen or smelled in the environment.
Participatory Rapid Appraisal (PRA)
A collection of participatory techniques used to gather information quickly and efficiently from local communities.

Key Statistics

Globally, 4.2 billion people used a safely managed sanitation service in 2017, but 2.3 billion still lacked basic sanitation facilities.

Source: WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene, 2019

According to UNICEF, diarrheal diseases are the second leading cause of death in children under five years old globally, largely due to poor sanitation and hygiene.

Source: UNICEF, 2023 (Knowledge Cutoff)

Examples

CLTS in Malawi

In Malawi, CLTS was successfully implemented by focusing on community mobilization and using local materials for toilet construction, making it affordable and sustainable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is CLTS only about building toilets?

No, CLTS is fundamentally about changing behaviour and creating a sense of collective responsibility for sanitation. Toilet construction is a result of this behaviour change, not the primary goal.