UPSC MainsLAW-PAPER-II201115 Marks150 Words
Q3.

Tort is concerned with the allocation on prevention of losses which are bound to occur in society. Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a discussion on the fundamental purpose of tort law. The approach should be to first define tort law, then explain its role in allocating responsibility for unavoidable societal losses. Focus on the principles of fault, negligence, strict liability, and absolute liability. Illustrate with examples and briefly touch upon the economic rationale behind tort law. Structure the answer by defining tort, explaining its function in loss allocation, detailing different liability standards, and concluding with its societal importance.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Tort law, derived from the Latin word ‘tortus’ meaning ‘wrong’, is a branch of civil law dealing with civil wrongs other than breach of contract. It is concerned with providing remedies for harms caused by one party to another, where the harm is not due to a voluntary agreement. In a complex society, accidents and harms are inevitable. Tort law doesn’t aim to eliminate these losses entirely, but rather to allocate the burden of those losses – determining who should bear the cost when harm occurs. This allocation is crucial for maintaining social order and promoting responsible behavior.

The Role of Tort Law in Loss Allocation

Tort law operates on the principle that individuals and entities should be held accountable for harms they cause to others. This accountability isn’t simply about punishment; it’s about ensuring that those who suffer losses are compensated, and that incentives are created to prevent future harm. The allocation of losses is achieved through various legal doctrines:

Different Standards of Liability

1. Fault-Based Liability (Negligence)

The most common basis for tort liability is negligence. To establish negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements: duty of care, breach of that duty, causation, and damages. This means the defendant had a legal obligation to avoid causing harm, failed to meet that obligation, and that failure directly resulted in the plaintiff’s injury. For example, a driver failing to obey traffic signals and causing an accident would be liable under negligence.

2. Strict Liability

Strict liability applies in situations where the activity itself is inherently dangerous, regardless of the level of care taken. The classic example is the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1868), concerning the escape of dangerous substances. If someone brings onto their land something likely to do mischief if it escapes, and it does escape, they are strictly liable for the resulting damage. This shifts the burden of loss to those who profit from the dangerous activity.

3. Absolute Liability

Absolute liability, a principle developed in India through the MC Mehta v Union of India (1987) case relating to the Oleum gas leak, goes a step further than strict liability. It imposes liability without any exceptions, even if the enterprise took all reasonable care. This standard is applied to hazardous industries and activities, recognizing the potential for catastrophic harm. The principle aims to ensure that the enterprise bears the entire cost of the damage.

Economic Rationale of Tort Law

Tort law isn’t just about fairness; it also has an economic rationale. By internalizing the costs of harmful activities, tort law encourages individuals and businesses to take precautions to avoid causing harm. This leads to a more efficient allocation of resources, as the true costs of activities are reflected in their prices. For instance, manufacturers are incentivized to design safer products to avoid potential liability claims.

Limitations and Considerations

While tort law aims to allocate losses effectively, it’s not a perfect system. Challenges include proving causation, determining appropriate damages, and balancing the interests of plaintiffs and defendants. The rise of defensive medicine, where doctors order unnecessary tests to avoid potential lawsuits, illustrates how tort law can sometimes have unintended consequences. Furthermore, the cost of litigation can be prohibitive for some potential plaintiffs.

Liability Standard Elements Required Example
Negligence Duty, Breach, Causation, Damages Careless driving causing an accident
Strict Liability Dangerous activity, Escape, Damage Explosives blasting causing property damage
Absolute Liability Hazardous activity, Damage (no exceptions) Gas leak from a chemical plant

Conclusion

In conclusion, tort law is fundamentally concerned with the allocation and prevention of losses inherent in societal activities. Through doctrines like negligence, strict liability, and absolute liability, it seeks to distribute the burden of harm in a fair and efficient manner. While not without its limitations, tort law plays a vital role in promoting responsible behavior, compensating victims, and ensuring that the costs of harmful activities are borne by those who benefit from them. Continued refinement of tort law principles is crucial to adapt to evolving societal risks and technological advancements.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Res Ipsa Loquitur
A doctrine meaning "the thing speaks for itself." It allows a court to infer negligence when the accident itself suggests negligence, even without direct evidence of wrongdoing.
Damages
Monetary compensation awarded to a plaintiff in a tort case to compensate for losses suffered, including medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage.

Key Statistics

According to a 2023 report by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), India witnessed over 5.5 lakh accidental deaths in 2022, highlighting the significant scope of tort law application.

Source: NCRB, Accidental Deaths & Suicides in India 2022

As per a 2021 study by the National Insurance Bureau, the number of motor accident claims filed in India increased by 15% compared to the previous year, indicating a growing need for effective tort law mechanisms.

Source: National Insurance Bureau, India (2021)

Examples

Donoghue v Stevenson (1932)

This landmark case established the modern principle of negligence and the "neighbour principle," holding manufacturers liable for harm caused by defective products to consumers.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between tort and crime?

Tort is a civil wrong, seeking compensation for harm, while a crime is a public wrong, punishable by the state. The same act can sometimes be both a tort and a crime (e.g., assault).

Topics Covered

LawTort LawCivil LawNegligence