Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Social justice, at its core, aims to create a society where all individuals have equal rights, opportunities, and access to resources, irrespective of their social background. Both Mahatma Gandhi and Dr. B.R. Ambedkar were pivotal figures in India’s struggle for independence and deeply concerned with achieving social justice, yet their approaches differed significantly. Gandhi, rooted in a Hindu revivalist perspective, advocated for the upliftment of the ‘Harijans’ within the existing social framework, while Ambedkar, having personally experienced the horrors of caste discrimination, championed radical social transformation and the dismantling of the caste system. Understanding their contrasting visions is crucial for comprehending the complexities of social justice in India.
Gandhi’s Perspective on Social Justice
Gandhi believed in the inherent goodness of all religions and advocated for a harmonious society based on Sarvodaya – the welfare of all. He viewed caste as a flawed social order but not inherently evil, believing it could be reformed through love, persuasion, and self-suffering. His approach to addressing untouchability focused on changing the hearts and minds of caste Hindus, coining the term ‘Harijan’ (children of God) to denote the untouchables.
- Emphasis on Moral Reform: Gandhi believed that social justice could be achieved through individual moral transformation and voluntary cooperation.
- Village Swaraj: He envisioned a decentralized, self-sufficient village economy as the foundation for social and economic justice.
- Trusteeship: Gandhi advocated for the concept of trusteeship, where the wealthy would hold their possessions in trust for the benefit of society.
Ambedkar’s Perspective on Social Justice
Ambedkar’s understanding of social justice was shaped by his lived experience of caste-based discrimination. He viewed caste as a deeply entrenched system of social hierarchy and exploitation that could not be reformed from within. He advocated for the complete annihilation of caste and believed that political rights were fundamental to achieving social justice.
- Annihilation of Caste: Ambedkar argued that caste must be abolished, not merely reformed, as it was inherently oppressive.
- Political Representation: He strongly advocated for reserved seats for marginalized communities in legislatures and government jobs to ensure their political empowerment.
- Economic Justice: Ambedkar believed that economic equality was essential for social justice and advocated for state intervention to redistribute wealth and resources.
Comparative Analysis
| Aspect | Gandhi’s View | Ambedkar’s View |
|---|---|---|
| Caste System | Flawed but reformable | Inherently oppressive, needs annihilation |
| Method of Change | Moral persuasion, self-suffering | Political mobilization, legal reforms |
| Focus | Changing hearts and minds | Securing political and economic rights |
| Approach to Untouchability | Upliftment of ‘Harijans’ within the system | Dismantling the system itself |
Differing Views on Safeguards
While both advocated for the upliftment of the marginalized, their approaches to safeguards differed. Gandhi was wary of separate electorates, fearing they would further fragment society. He preferred joint electorates with reserved seats. Ambedkar, however, initially advocated for separate electorates for depressed classes, believing it was the only way to ensure their effective representation. He later accepted the Poona Pact (1932) which provided for reserved seats in provincial legislatures, but remained skeptical about its long-term effectiveness.
Legacies and Contemporary Relevance
Gandhi’s emphasis on moral reform and non-violence continues to inspire social movements. However, his approach to caste has been criticized for being paternalistic and failing to address the structural inequalities inherent in the system. Ambedkar’s legacy lies in his articulation of the plight of the marginalized and his advocacy for their political and economic empowerment. His ideas continue to inform affirmative action policies and social justice movements in India today. The ongoing debates surrounding reservation policies and social inclusion reflect the enduring relevance of their contrasting perspectives.
Conclusion
Both Gandhi and Ambedkar made significant contributions to the discourse on social justice in India, albeit through divergent paths. Gandhi’s emphasis on moral transformation and Sarvodaya offered a vision of inclusive society, while Ambedkar’s radical critique of caste and advocacy for political rights provided a framework for challenging systemic oppression. A comprehensive approach to social justice in contemporary India requires integrating the ethical concerns of Gandhi with the structural analysis and political activism championed by Ambedkar.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.