UPSC MainsZOOLOGY-PAPER-I201115 Marks150 Words
Q1.

What was the need to create Parazoa against Porifera when the latter existed?

How to Approach

This question delves into the historical context of zoological classification. The key is to understand that 'Parazoa' wasn't created to *replace* 'Porifera', but to address evolving understanding of animal phylogeny. The answer should explain the initial classification based on observable traits (Porifera – pore-bearing), then how advancements in embryology and cellular organization revealed a fundamental difference – the absence of true tissues in Porifera. Focus on the criteria used for establishing Parazoa as a distinct subkingdom. Structure: Introduction defining both terms, body explaining the rationale for the new classification, and conclusion summarizing the evolutionary significance.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Porifera, commonly known as sponges, represent the simplest multicellular animals. Initially classified based on their porous body structure, they were considered a primary branch of the animal kingdom. However, as zoological studies progressed, particularly in the fields of embryology and histology, certain fundamental differences between sponges and other animals became apparent. This led to the creation of the subkingdom Parazoa ("beside animals") to accommodate these unique characteristics, not to negate the existence or validity of Porifera, but to refine the broader understanding of animal evolution.

The Initial Classification: Porifera

The phylum Porifera was established by Robert Grant in 1836, based on the distinctive feature of having numerous pores (ostia) all over their body, facilitating water flow for feeding and respiration. Sponges lack true tissues and organs, exhibiting a cellular level of organization. Their body is supported by spicules made of calcium carbonate or silica, and amoebocytes perform various functions like digestion and reproduction. This initial classification was purely morphological.

The Emergence of Parazoa: A Shift in Understanding

As scientists delved deeper into animal development, particularly during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the absence of true tissues in sponges became a critical distinction. True tissues are groups of similar cells performing specific functions, organized into layers (germ layers – ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm). Sponges lack these germ layers, and their cells are relatively independent, capable of de-differentiation and re-aggregation.

Key Differences and the Rationale for Parazoa

The creation of Parazoa was driven by the need to reflect this fundamental difference in organization. Animals with true tissues are grouped under the subkingdom Eumetazoa ("true animals"). Parazoa, therefore, represents a lineage that diverged *before* the evolution of true tissues. This distinction is crucial for understanding the evolutionary relationships between animals.

Comparative Table: Porifera vs. Eumetazoa

Feature Porifera (Parazoa) Eumetazoa
Tissue Organization Cellular level; lacks true tissues Tissue, organ, and organ system levels
Germ Layers Absent Present (Ectoderm, Mesoderm, Endoderm)
Symmetry Asymmetrical or radial Radial or bilateral
Cellular Differentiation Limited; cells totipotent High degree of specialization

Phylogenetic Implications

The establishment of Parazoa helped refine the phylogenetic tree of animals. It positioned sponges as the most basal animal group, representing the earliest branch in animal evolution. Molecular phylogenetic studies, using ribosomal RNA gene sequences, have largely confirmed this placement, supporting the idea that sponges diverged early in animal history. The evolution of true tissues is considered a major evolutionary innovation that allowed for greater complexity and specialization in Eumetazoa.

It's Not a Replacement, But a Refinement

It’s important to reiterate that Parazoa doesn’t invalidate Porifera. Porifera remains the phylum encompassing all sponges. Parazoa is a higher-level taxonomic grouping that *includes* Porifera, along with any other animal groups that might be discovered to lack true tissues. It’s a classification based on a deeper understanding of evolutionary relationships.

Conclusion

The creation of Parazoa wasn’t a rejection of the Porifera classification, but a necessary refinement driven by advancements in developmental biology and phylogenetic analysis. It highlighted the fundamental difference in tissue organization between sponges and all other animals, positioning sponges as the earliest diverging lineage in the animal kingdom. This taxonomic shift reflects the dynamic nature of scientific understanding and the ongoing quest to accurately represent the evolutionary history of life on Earth.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Parazoa
A subkingdom of animals characterized by the absence of true tissues and organs. The name means "beside animals," indicating their early divergence from the main animal lineage.
Eumetazoa
A subkingdom of animals characterized by the presence of true tissues and organs. The name means "true animals."

Key Statistics

There are approximately 15,000 known species of sponges (Porifera) distributed across marine and freshwater habitats.

Source: World Porifera Database (as of knowledge cutoff 2023)

Sponges contribute significantly to marine ecosystems, filtering up to 50 liters of water per day per square centimeter.

Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - as of knowledge cutoff 2023

Examples

Sponges and Biomedical Research

Sponges produce a variety of bioactive compounds with potential medicinal applications, including anti-cancer and anti-viral properties. This has led to significant research in marine biotechnology.

Glass Sponges (Hexactinellida)

Glass sponges, belonging to the class Hexactinellida, are unique sponges with skeletons made of silica. They are found in deep-sea environments and exhibit intricate structural designs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are sponges considered the most primitive animals?

Sponges lack true tissues, organs, and a defined body symmetry, characteristics considered ancestral to more complex animals. Their cellular organization and developmental patterns suggest they diverged early in animal evolution.

Topics Covered

ZoologyEvolutionInvertebratesPhylogenyAnimal Classification