UPSC MainsENGLISH-LITERATURE-PAPER-II201212 Marks
Q4.

D. H. Lawrence's 'Sons and Lovers' is as much autobiographical as Dicken's David Copperfield.

How to Approach

This question requires a comparative analysis of D.H. Lawrence’s ‘Sons and Lovers’ and Charles Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield’ regarding their autobiographical elements. The answer should avoid simply listing similarities; instead, it needs to delve into the *nature* of the autobiographical content – how much is direct mirroring of life, how much is fictionalization, and what purpose does this autobiographical element serve in each novel. Structure the answer by first defining ‘autobiographical novel’, then examining each novel separately, highlighting specific instances of autobiographical resonance, and finally, drawing a comparative conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The ‘autobiographical novel’ is a genre where the author draws heavily from their own life experiences, incorporating them into a fictional narrative. While complete factual accuracy isn’t the goal, these novels often explore themes, characters, and settings rooted in the author’s personal history. Both D.H. Lawrence’s ‘Sons and Lovers’ (1913) and Charles Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield’ (1850) are frequently cited as prime examples of this genre. However, the extent and function of autobiographical elements differ significantly. While both authors utilize their lived experiences, the manner in which they are woven into the narrative, and the resulting impact on the novels, warrants a detailed comparative examination to assess the validity of the claim that Lawrence’s work is *as much* autobiographical as Dickens’.

Autobiographical Elements in ‘David Copperfield’

Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield’ is widely considered the most autobiographical of his novels. The novel closely mirrors many events in Dickens’ own childhood and early adulthood. David’s unhappy childhood, his time working in a blacking factory (reflecting Dickens’ own experience at Warren’s Blacking Warehouse), and his struggles with poverty are all directly drawn from Dickens’ life. The character of Mr. Micawber is believed to be based on Dickens’ father, John Dickens, a man prone to financial mismanagement and optimistic delusion. Similarly, the cruel headmaster, Mr. Creakle, is thought to be inspired by Dickens’ own schoolmaster, William Jones.

However, Dickens doesn’t present a purely factual account. He *selectively* incorporates and modifies his experiences. The novel is a fictionalized narrative, and Dickens embellishes and alters events for dramatic effect and thematic resonance. For example, David’s romantic relationships are largely fictional, and the narrative structure is carefully crafted for storytelling purposes. Dickens uses his personal experiences as a foundation, but builds upon them to create a broader commentary on Victorian society and the plight of the vulnerable.

Autobiographical Elements in ‘Sons and Lovers’

‘Sons and Lovers’ is arguably even more intensely autobiographical than ‘David Copperfield’. The novel’s protagonist, Paul Morel, is a thinly veiled representation of D.H. Lawrence himself. The relationship between Paul and his mother, Gertrude, is a direct reflection of Lawrence’s own complex and often fraught relationship with his mother, Lydia. The mining town of Bestwood, where the Morels live, is based on Lawrence’s birthplace, Eastwood, Nottinghamshire. The characters of William Morel (Paul’s father) and Mrs. Morel are heavily based on Lawrence’s parents.

Unlike Dickens, Lawrence seems less concerned with shaping his autobiographical material for broader social commentary. The novel is primarily focused on the psychological dynamics within the Morel family, particularly the Oedipal tensions between Paul and his mother. The novel’s emotional intensity and psychological realism stem directly from Lawrence’s own deeply personal experiences. The depiction of the working-class life in the mining community is also remarkably authentic, reflecting Lawrence’s intimate knowledge of the environment. The novel’s exploration of sexuality and the limitations of societal norms is also deeply rooted in Lawrence’s own rebellious spirit and unconventional views.

Comparative Analysis

While both novels draw heavily on the authors’ lives, the *degree* and *purpose* of the autobiographical elements differ. Dickens uses his experiences to create a panoramic portrait of Victorian England, focusing on social injustice and the struggles of the individual within a complex society. His autobiographical elements serve as a foundation for a broader social critique. Lawrence, on the other hand, is primarily interested in exploring the inner lives of his characters, particularly the psychological complexities of family relationships and the impact of social constraints on individual desire. His autobiographical elements are used to achieve a profound psychological realism.

Feature ‘David Copperfield’ ‘Sons and Lovers’
Degree of Autobiographical Content Significant, but selectively incorporated and fictionalized. Extremely high; characters and settings closely based on life.
Primary Focus Social commentary, Victorian society, individual’s place within it. Psychological realism, family dynamics, individual desire.
Use of Autobiography Foundation for broader narrative and social critique. Core of the novel’s emotional and psychological intensity.
Fictionalization More extensive; characters and plotlines are significantly altered. Less extensive; characters and settings remain remarkably close to reality.

Therefore, while both novels are undeniably autobiographical, Lawrence’s ‘Sons and Lovers’ arguably relies on autobiographical material to a greater extent and with a more direct and unflinching intensity than Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield’. The claim that Lawrence’s novel is *as much* autobiographical as Dickens’ is, in fact, an understatement.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both ‘David Copperfield’ and ‘Sons and Lovers’ demonstrate the powerful potential of autobiographical fiction. However, the nature of that autobiography differs significantly. Dickens uses his life as a springboard for a wider social narrative, while Lawrence delves into the raw emotional and psychological depths of his own experiences. The intensity and directness of Lawrence’s autobiographical engagement arguably surpass that of Dickens, making ‘Sons and Lovers’ a more profoundly personal and psychologically revealing work. Both novels remain enduring testaments to the enduring power of personal experience in shaping literary creation.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Bildungsroman
A German word meaning "novel of formation" or "novel of education." It's a genre of novel that focuses on the psychological and moral growth of the protagonist from youth to adulthood, in which character change is extremely important.
Oedipal Complex
A concept from psychoanalytic theory, first described by Sigmund Freud, referring to a child's unconscious sexual desire for the opposite-sex parent and feelings of jealousy and rivalry with the same-sex parent. This is a central theme in ‘Sons and Lovers’.

Key Statistics

Charles Dickens’ ‘David Copperfield’ was initially published in serial form between 1849 and 1850, selling approximately 100,000 copies per installment.

Source: Ackroyd, Peter. *Dickens*. Sinclair-Stevenson, 1992.

D.H. Lawrence faced censorship and legal challenges during his lifetime, with ‘The Rainbow’ (1915) and ‘Lady Chatterley’s Lover’ (1928) being banned for obscenity.

Source: Knowledge cutoff: 2021

Examples

The Blacking Factory Incident

Dickens’ experience working at Warren’s Blacking Warehouse after his father’s imprisonment is directly reflected in David Copperfield’s time working at Murdstone and Grinby’s warehouse. This experience deeply affected Dickens and fueled his social commentary on child labor and poverty.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it possible to separate the author from the work when analyzing autobiographical novels?

It’s difficult, and often undesirable, to completely separate the author from the work. However, it’s crucial to remember that the novel is still a *creation*, not a mere transcription of life. The author makes choices about what to include, exclude, and how to present it.