UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-I201215 Marks200 Words
Q12.

If 'To be is to be perceived' then how does Berkeley explain the permanence of things ? Explain.

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed understanding of George Berkeley’s Idealism, specifically his famous assertion "Esse est percipi" (To be is to be perceived). The answer should first explain the core tenet of Berkeley’s philosophy and the problem it poses for the permanence of objects. Then, it should meticulously outline Berkeley’s solution – the role of God as the ultimate perceiver. The answer should demonstrate a clear grasp of the philosophical concepts involved and present them in a structured manner. Focus on explaining *how* God’s perception ensures continuity and prevents objects from ceasing to exist when not perceived by finite minds.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

George Berkeley, an 18th-century Irish philosopher, is renowned for his subjective idealism, encapsulated in the Latin phrase "Esse est percipi" – "To be is to be perceived." This radical claim challenges our common-sense understanding of reality, asserting that objects exist only insofar as they are perceived by a mind. This immediately raises a critical question: if existence is contingent upon perception, how can we account for the apparent permanence and continuity of objects when no finite mind is actively perceiving them? Berkeley’s response lies in invoking the omnipresent and eternal perception of God, a crucial element in his philosophical system.

Berkeley’s Idealism and the Problem of Permanence

Berkeley’s idealism stems from his rejection of abstract ideas and material substance. He argues that we only experience qualities – color, shape, texture – and not a substance underlying these qualities. To posit a material substance is to introduce an unnecessary and unknowable entity. Therefore, existence is fundamentally tied to perception. When we perceive an object, it exists; when we don’t, it doesn’t. This leads to the obvious problem: if I close my eyes, does the table cease to exist? If no one is looking at it, does it vanish?

The Role of God as the Ultimate Perceiver

Berkeley resolves this issue by introducing God as the constant perceiver. He argues that God’s perception is not intermittent like human perception. God is an infinite spirit who perceives all things at all times. This continuous perception ensures the continued existence of objects even when no finite mind is perceiving them. It’s not that objects *become* real when perceived, but rather that they *remain* real because they are always perceived by God.

Key Aspects of God’s Perception

  • Omnipresence: God is everywhere, and therefore perceives everything.
  • Omniscience: God knows everything, including all the qualities of all objects.
  • Continuity: God’s perception is constant and unbroken, unlike human perception which is subject to sleep, distraction, and death.
  • Will and Ideas: God not only perceives objects but also *wills* them into existence and maintains their consistent qualities. The regularity of nature, according to Berkeley, is a manifestation of God’s will.

Addressing Objections

Berkeley anticipates objections to this claim. One might ask why God chooses to present us with a consistent and orderly world. Berkeley answers that this is a manifestation of God’s goodness and wisdom. God could have created a chaotic and unpredictable world, but He chose to create a world governed by laws that are consistent and understandable to us. Another objection concerns the possibility of God deceiving us. Berkeley argues that God is perfect and therefore incapable of deception. Our perceptions are veridical – they accurately represent the ideas in God’s mind.

Implications for Knowledge

Berkeley’s idealism has significant implications for epistemology. Knowledge, for Berkeley, is not about discovering truths about an external material world, but about understanding the ideas in our minds and recognizing that these ideas are ultimately grounded in God’s mind. This shifts the focus from objective reality to the subjective experience and the divine source of all knowledge.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Berkeley’s assertion that “To be is to be perceived” initially appears to undermine the permanence of objects. However, he skillfully addresses this challenge by positing God as the ultimate and continuous perceiver. God’s omnipresent, omniscient, and unbroken perception ensures the continued existence of things even when not perceived by finite minds. This solution, while unconventional, is central to understanding the coherence and completeness of Berkeley’s idealistic philosophy, offering a unique perspective on the nature of reality and knowledge.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Idealism
The philosophical view that reality is fundamentally mental, mentally constructed, or otherwise immaterial. In its most extreme form, idealism asserts that there is nothing existing independently of the mind.
Empiricism
The theory that knowledge comes primarily from sensory experience. Berkeley, while an idealist, shares empiricist roots with philosophers like Locke and Hume, emphasizing the importance of perception in forming our ideas.

Key Statistics

According to a 2023 Pew Research Center study, approximately 28% of U.S. adults identify as religiously unaffiliated, potentially influencing perspectives on the role of a divine perceiver in philosophical discussions.

Source: Pew Research Center, 2023

Studies in cognitive neuroscience suggest that approximately 40% of the brain’s resources are dedicated to processing visual information, highlighting the central role of perception in our understanding of the world (as of knowledge cutoff 2023).

Source: Various neuroscience studies, 2023

Examples

The Tree Falling in the Forest

A classic thought experiment illustrating the core of Berkeley’s idealism. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make a sound? Berkeley would argue that the sound (as a perception) does not exist without a perceiver, whether human or divine.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Berkeley deny the existence of the external world altogether?

Not entirely. Berkeley doesn’t deny that we have experiences of an external world. He denies that there is a material *substance* underlying those experiences. The world exists as a collection of ideas in the minds of perceivers, ultimately grounded in God’s mind.

Topics Covered

PhilosophyEpistemologyIdealismPerceptionImmaterialismGod