Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
China’s foreign policy has been increasingly shaped by a perceived need to counter what it views as attempts at containment, often referred to as its ‘anti-encirclement struggle’ (反包围). This stems from a historical sensitivity to encirclement, particularly during its period of isolation, and is now manifested in concerns about the US-led alliances and partnerships in the Indo-Pacific. Recent years have witnessed notable shifts in China’s relations with both Japan and India, marked by periods of tension and tentative cooperation. Understanding whether these shifts are interconnected, and how they relate to China’s broader strategic goals, is crucial for comprehending the evolving geopolitical landscape of Asia.
China’s ‘Anti-Encirclement Struggle’: A Historical Perspective
The concept of ‘anti-encirclement’ has deep roots in Chinese history, particularly during the early 20th century when the Nationalist government under Chiang Kai-shek faced both internal rebellion and external threats. Today, China perceives a similar dynamic, albeit in a different form. It views the strengthening of security alliances – such as the Quad (US, India, Japan, Australia) – and increased military presence in the region as attempts to contain its rise. This perception fuels its efforts to build alternative partnerships and assert its influence.
Shifting Sino-Japanese Relations
Historically, Sino-Japanese relations have been fraught with tension stemming from Japan’s wartime aggression and unresolved historical grievances. However, economic interdependence has often tempered political disputes. In recent years, relations have been particularly strained due to:
- Territorial Disputes: The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands remain a major point of contention.
- Historical Revisionism: Concerns over Japan’s historical narratives and visits to the Yasukuni Shrine.
- Geopolitical Competition: Japan’s closer alignment with the US and its role in regional security initiatives.
Despite these tensions, there have been periods of diplomatic engagement, particularly driven by economic interests. However, China views Japan’s increasing military capabilities and its alignment with the US as contributing to its encirclement.
Evolving Sino-Indian Relations
Sino-Indian relations have followed a complex trajectory, marked by border disputes, economic competition, and strategic rivalry. Key developments include:
- The 1962 War: The unresolved border dispute remains a significant source of tension.
- Economic Ties: Despite political differences, bilateral trade has grown substantially, though a trade imbalance exists in China’s favor. (As of 2022, trade exceeded $135 billion – Source: Ministry of Commerce, China).
- The Doklam Standoff (2017): A significant escalation in tensions due to infrastructure development near the tri-junction between India, China, and Bhutan.
- Galwan Valley Clash (2020): A violent clash resulting in casualties on both sides, leading to a prolonged military standoff along the Line of Actual Control (LAC).
India’s growing strategic partnership with the US, particularly through the Quad, is viewed by China with considerable concern.
The Linkage: China’s Strategic Calculus
There is a discernible linkage between China’s relations with Japan and India, viewed through the lens of its ‘anti-encirclement struggle’. China attempts to manage its relationships with both countries in a way that prevents the formation of a cohesive anti-China front.
| Aspect | China’s Approach to Japan | China’s Approach to India |
|---|---|---|
| Strategic Perception | Views Japan as a key US ally and a potential source of containment. | Views India as a rising power with the potential to align with the US and challenge China’s regional dominance. |
| Relationship Management | Balances economic engagement with political caution, attempting to manage tensions while preventing a full-fledged alliance with the US. | Attempts to compartmentalize border disputes from broader economic and diplomatic engagement, while simultaneously seeking to dissuade India from closer ties with the US. |
| Impact of Third-Party Relations | China is wary of deepening US-Japan security cooperation. | China is particularly sensitive to India’s growing alignment with the US, Australia, and Japan through the Quad. |
When relations with Japan deteriorate, China often attempts to improve ties with India, and vice versa, to avoid being strategically isolated. The Galwan Valley clash, for instance, coincided with increased Chinese efforts to engage with Japan on economic issues. This demonstrates a deliberate attempt to diversify its strategic options and prevent a unified front against it.
Conclusion
In conclusion, a clear linkage exists between China’s relations with Japan and India, fundamentally shaped by its ‘anti-encirclement struggle’. China strategically manages its relationships with both countries, seeking to prevent the formation of a cohesive alliance that could challenge its regional ambitions. The evolving geopolitical landscape, characterized by increasing US-China competition and the rise of India, will likely continue to influence this dynamic, requiring careful calibration by all parties involved. The future trajectory of Sino-Japanese and Sino-Indian relations will be crucial in determining the stability and balance of power in the Indo-Pacific region.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.