Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The Siachen Glacier, often termed the ‘Third Pole’, is the world’s highest battlefield. The ongoing conflict between India and Pakistan over its control, initiated in 1984 with Operation Meghdoot by India, is not about territorial gains but strategic dominance. This dispute, however, has had devastating environmental consequences, transforming a pristine glacial ecosystem into a heavily militarized zone. The question of environmental peace-keeping and collaborative arrangements is increasingly pertinent given the accelerating impacts of climate change on Himalayan glaciers and the shared vulnerability of both nations.
Political Context of the Siachen Conflict
The Siachen conflict’s roots lie in the incomplete demarcation of the India-Pakistan border following the 1972 Simla Agreement. The agreement left the area north of the NJ 9842 coordinate undefined, creating a vacuum. Pakistan attempted to assert its claim by sending expeditions to the glacier in the early 1980s. India responded with Operation Meghdoot, pre-emptively occupying key heights and establishing control over the glacier.
- Strategic Importance: Control of Siachen provides India with a strategic advantage, preventing Pakistan from potentially linking up with China through the Karakoram Pass.
- Trust Deficit: Deep-seated mistrust and historical animosity between India and Pakistan have consistently hindered any substantial progress towards a resolution.
- Domestic Political Considerations: Both countries face domestic political pressures that make concessions on Siachen difficult. Any perceived weakness could be exploited by opposition parties.
Environmental Context of the Siachen Conflict
The militarization of Siachen has resulted in significant environmental degradation. The presence of thousands of troops, helicopters, and the generation of waste have severely impacted the fragile glacial ecosystem.
- Glacial Melt: Increased black carbon deposition from military machinery and burning of fuel accelerates glacial melt. Studies suggest a significant increase in melt rates compared to other Himalayan glaciers.
- Waste Management: Accumulation of non-biodegradable waste (plastic, packaging) poses a long-term pollution threat. The extremely cold temperatures inhibit decomposition.
- Water Pollution: Human waste and fuel spills contaminate glacial streams and rivers, impacting downstream water resources.
- Avalanche Risk: Military activities, including explosions and construction, can destabilize slopes and increase the risk of avalanches. The 2019 avalanche that buried Pakistani soldiers is a stark reminder of this danger.
| Environmental Impact | Details |
|---|---|
| Glacier Melt Rate | Accelerated due to black carbon and anthropogenic heat. |
| Waste Accumulation | Tons of non-biodegradable waste posing long-term pollution risks. |
| Water Contamination | Human and fuel waste polluting glacial streams. |
| Avalanche Frequency | Increased due to military activities and slope destabilization. |
Possibility of Environmental Peace-Keeping and Collaborative Arrangements
Despite the political challenges, there is growing recognition of the need for environmental cooperation on Siachen. ‘Environmental peace-keeping’ could involve several steps:
- Joint Glacial Monitoring: Establishing a joint monitoring system to track glacial melt rates, water quality, and pollution levels.
- Disaster Mitigation: Collaborative efforts to develop early warning systems for glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) and avalanches.
- Waste Management Protocol: Implementing a joint protocol for the removal and responsible disposal of accumulated waste.
- Demilitarization (Phased): A phased withdrawal of troops, starting with less sensitive areas, could reduce the environmental footprint. This is the most politically sensitive aspect.
- Transboundary Data Sharing: Sharing of scientific data and research findings related to the Siachen Glacier and its impact on downstream water resources.
However, success hinges on building trust and addressing security concerns. Any collaborative arrangement must be verifiable and transparent to ensure compliance. The Indus Waters Treaty provides a potential model for managing shared water resources, but its application to Siachen would require significant political will.
Conclusion
The Siachen conflict represents a tragic example of how geopolitical rivalries can exacerbate environmental degradation. While a complete resolution remains elusive, the shared vulnerability to climate change and the urgent need to protect the Himalayan ecosystem present a compelling case for environmental peace-keeping. Collaborative arrangements, focused on glacial monitoring, disaster mitigation, and responsible waste management, are not merely desirable but essential for the long-term sustainability of the region and the well-being of millions who depend on its water resources. A shift in perspective, recognizing the environment as a common security threat, is crucial for fostering cooperation between India and Pakistan.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.