Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Attention, a fundamental cognitive process, allows us to selectively focus on specific stimuli while ignoring others. Donald Broadbent’s Filter Theory, proposed in 1958, was a pioneering attempt to explain this selective attention. It emerged as a response to the ‘cocktail party effect’ – the ability to focus on one conversation amidst a noisy environment. Broadbent posited a model where information processing occurs in a series of stages, with a filter mechanism playing a crucial role in determining which information reaches further stages of processing. This theory, while influential, faced significant challenges, leading to the development of alternative models.
Broadbent’s Filter Theory: A Detailed Explanation
Broadbent’s Filter Theory proposes a two-stage model of attention. The first stage involves a filter that selects stimuli based on their physical characteristics (e.g., loudness, pitch, spatial location). This filter allows only one channel of information to pass through, effectively blocking out unattended information. The second stage involves a detector that processes the selected information for meaning, and then information is passed to short-term memory.
- Filter: Operates early in processing, based on physical characteristics.
- Detector: Processes the selected information for meaning.
- Short-Term Memory: Stores the processed information.
Broadbent supported his theory with experiments where participants were presented with different digits simultaneously in each ear (dichotic listening). Participants were asked to report digits heard in one ear (attended ear) and were largely unable to recall digits presented in the unattended ear, suggesting that the filter effectively blocked out unattended information.
Inadequacies of Broadbent’s Filter Theory
Despite its initial appeal, Broadbent’s theory faced several criticisms and empirical challenges:
- Cocktail Party Effect: The theory couldn’t explain the cocktail party effect, where individuals can detect their name or emotionally significant words even in the unattended ear. This suggests that some unattended information is processed for meaning.
- Unattended Information Processing: Experiments by Anne Treisman (1964) demonstrated that unattended information is not completely blocked but rather attenuated (weakened). Participants could report some information from the unattended ear, particularly if it was presented with a high degree of salience.
- Early Selection Criticism: The theory’s assertion of ‘early selection’ – that filtering occurs before semantic processing – was challenged by studies showing that semantic processing can occur even for unattended stimuli.
Alternate Approaches to Attention
Treisman’s Attenuation Theory (1964)
Treisman proposed an attenuation model, modifying Broadbent’s theory. Instead of a complete filter, Treisman suggested an attenuator that weakens the signal of unattended information. Important or personally relevant stimuli have a lower attenuation threshold, allowing them to be processed further. This explains the cocktail party effect, as one’s name would have a low threshold and thus be noticed.
Deutsch & Deutsch’s Late Selection Theory (1963)
Deutsch and Deutsch argued for late selection, suggesting that all stimuli are fully processed for meaning, and selection occurs at a later stage, based on relevance to current goals. This theory explains why unattended information can sometimes influence behavior, but it struggles to explain the limited capacity of attention. It posits that all information is analyzed semantically, and then a response selection process determines which information is acted upon.
| Theory | Selection Stage | Key Feature | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadbent’s Filter Theory | Early | Complete filtering based on physical characteristics | Cannot explain cocktail party effect, ignores semantic processing of unattended stimuli |
| Treisman’s Attenuation Theory | Intermediate | Attenuation of unattended stimuli, lower threshold for important stimuli | Doesn’t fully explain capacity limitations |
| Deutsch & Deutsch’s Late Selection Theory | Late | All stimuli processed for meaning before selection | Difficulty explaining limited attentional capacity |
Conclusion
Broadbent’s Filter Theory was a significant contribution to our understanding of attention, providing a foundational model for subsequent research. However, its limitations, particularly its inability to account for the processing of unattended information, led to the development of more nuanced theories like Treisman’s Attenuation Theory and Deutsch & Deutsch’s Late Selection Theory. Modern perspectives on attention often integrate elements from these different approaches, recognizing that attention is a complex and dynamic process involving both early and late selection mechanisms. Further research continues to refine our understanding of the intricate interplay between selective attention and cognitive processing.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.