UPSC MainsAGRICULTURE-PAPER-I201310 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q19.

The relative responses of photosynthesis in C3 and C4 plants to temperature and CO2 concentration.

How to Approach

This question requires a comparative analysis of photosynthetic responses in C3 and C4 plants. A structured approach is crucial. Begin by defining C3 and C4 photosynthesis briefly. Then, detail their responses to increasing temperature, highlighting differences in enzyme activity and metabolic pathways. Next, analyze their responses to varying CO2 concentrations, explaining how initial CO2 fixation differs. Finally, briefly discuss the ecological implications of these differences. A tabular comparison would enhance clarity.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Photosynthesis, the cornerstone of life on Earth, varies significantly across plant species depending on their evolutionary adaptations. C3 photosynthesis, the most common pathway, was the initial mechanism. Later, C4 photosynthesis evolved as an adaptation to hot, arid environments. Understanding the differing responses of these pathways to environmental factors like temperature and CO2 concentration is crucial for comprehending plant physiology and agricultural strategies. The recent IPCC reports highlight the increasing environmental stresses impacting global agriculture, making this knowledge increasingly relevant.

Photosynthesis: A Comparative Overview

C3 photosynthesis, prevalent in plants like wheat, rice, and soybeans, involves the direct fixation of CO2 by RuBisCO (Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase). C4 photosynthesis, found in plants like maize, sugarcane, and sorghum, initially fixes CO2 into a four-carbon compound via PEP carboxylase, bypassing RuBisCO initially.

Response to Temperature

Temperature significantly impacts photosynthetic rates by influencing enzyme activity. RuBisCO, the enzyme central to C3 photosynthesis, has a lower temperature optimum (around 25°C) and is also prone to oxygenation at higher temperatures, leading to photorespiration. PEP carboxylase, used in C4 plants, has a higher temperature optimum (around 35-40°C) and is less susceptible to photorespiration.

Feature C3 Plants C4 Plants
RuBisCO Optimum Temperature ~25°C Not applicable (bypassed)
Photorespiration High Low
Temperature Sensitivity More Sensitive Less Sensitive

Response to CO2 Concentration

C3 plants benefit significantly from increased CO2 concentrations as it enhances the carboxylation reaction by RuBisCO. However, their photosynthetic rate is limited by RuBisCO's efficiency. C4 plants, due to their initial CO2 fixation mechanism, maintain high CO2 concentration around RuBisCO, minimizing photorespiration even at lower ambient CO2 levels. This advantage diminishes as atmospheric CO2 levels rise.

The initial CO2 fixation in C4 plants involves two steps:

  1. PEP carboxylase fixes CO2 into oxaloacetate in mesophyll cells.
  2. Oxaloacetate is converted to malate, transported to bundle sheath cells, where it releases CO2, which is then fixed by RuBisCO.

Ecological Implications

C4 plants thrive in hot, dry environments with high light intensity because of their higher water use efficiency and reduced photorespiration. C3 plants are more dominant in cooler, wetter climates. Climate change, with increasing temperatures and altered CO2 levels, is influencing plant distribution and agricultural practices, potentially favoring C4 plants in some regions.

Case Study: Maize and Wheat in a Changing Climate

Maize (C4) and wheat (C3) are staple crops globally. As temperatures rise, maize generally exhibits better performance than wheat due to its higher temperature tolerance and lower photorespiration. However, with increasing CO2, the advantage of C4 plants might diminish, potentially impacting wheat yields in cooler regions. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) is actively researching drought-resistant varieties of both crops.

Scheme: National Mission for Sustainable Agriculture (NMSA)

The NMSA, launched in 2010 by the Indian government, promotes sustainable agricultural practices. A key component is developing climate-resilient crop varieties, including both C3 and C4 species, to mitigate the impacts of climate change on agricultural production. It focuses on improving water use efficiency and promoting drought-resistant varieties.

Conclusion

In conclusion, C3 and C4 plants exhibit distinct responses to temperature and CO2 concentration, driven by their differing photosynthetic pathways and enzymatic efficiencies. While C4 plants currently hold an advantage in warmer climates, rising CO2 levels may alter this dynamic. Understanding these physiological differences is vital for developing strategies to ensure food security in a changing climate and optimizing agricultural practices for various environments. Further research into improving RuBisCO efficiency in C3 plants remains a critical area of focus.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Photorespiration
A metabolic pathway where RuBisCO binds to oxygen instead of carbon dioxide, reducing photosynthetic efficiency. It's more prevalent in C3 plants at higher temperatures.
RuBisCO
Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase – the enzyme responsible for carbon fixation in C3 photosynthesis. It can also bind to oxygen, leading to photorespiration.

Key Statistics

C4 plants are estimated to be responsible for approximately 25% of global carbon fixation, despite comprising only 5% of plant species. (Source: Knowledge Cutoff)

Source: Various Research Papers

The global average atmospheric CO2 concentration is currently around 420 parts per million (ppm). (Source: NOAA)

Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)

Examples

Sugarcane as a C4 Plant

Sugarcane, a major source of sugar globally, demonstrates the efficiency of C4 photosynthesis in hot, humid climates. Its high yield and water use efficiency are attributed to its C4 pathway.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are C4 plants considered more water-use efficient?

C4 plants have a lower stomatal conductance, meaning they lose less water through transpiration while maintaining higher CO2 uptake due to the initial CO2 concentration mechanism.

Topics Covered

BiologyPlant PhysiologyPhotosynthesisCarbon FixationPlant Adaptation