UPSC MainsAGRICULTURE-PAPER-II201312 Marks200 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q16.

DNA fingerprinting in plant variety registration/protection.

How to Approach

This question requires a blend of biological and legal understanding. The approach should begin by defining DNA fingerprinting and its relevance to plant variety registration. Then, discuss the legal framework in India (Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001) and how DNA fingerprinting is utilized. Highlight the benefits and challenges associated with its implementation, and conclude by emphasizing the importance of accurate identification for safeguarding plant biodiversity and intellectual property rights. Structure: Definition, Legal Framework, Benefits, Challenges, Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

DNA fingerprinting, also known as DNA profiling, is a laboratory technique used to establish a unique genetic signature for an organism. In the context of agriculture, particularly concerning plant varieties, it serves as a powerful tool for accurate identification and differentiation. The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act, 2001, recognizes the importance of safeguarding plant genetic resources and protecting the rights of plant breeders. The Act mandates the use of DNA fingerprinting to establish the distinctiveness of new plant varieties during the registration process, ensuring accurate identification and preventing fraudulent claims. This is increasingly crucial given the rise in genetically modified crops and the need for robust intellectual property protection.

What is DNA Fingerprinting in Plants?

DNA fingerprinting in plants involves analyzing specific DNA regions (markers) that vary between different varieties. These markers, often microsatellites or SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms), are amplified using Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and visualized through gel electrophoresis or capillary electrophoresis. The resulting banding pattern is unique to each variety, providing a genetic “fingerprint”.

Legal Framework: PPV&FR Act, 2001

The PPV&FR Act, 2001, is the cornerstone of plant variety protection in India. Section 16(1)(c) specifically mandates the use of "scientific data, including DNA fingerprinting" to establish the distinctiveness of a variety. The Act aims to protect both breeders' rights and farmers' rights. The National Gene Bank is responsible for maintaining reference collections and providing DNA fingerprinting services for variety registration.

Benefits of DNA Fingerprinting in Plant Variety Registration

  • Accurate Identification: Provides a definitive method for distinguishing between similar-looking varieties, crucial for preventing misrepresentation and ensuring accurate records.
  • Protection of Intellectual Property: Strengthens the legal basis for protecting new plant varieties from unauthorized propagation and sale.
  • Combating Infringement: Enables efficient detection of illegally propagated varieties and enforcement of breeders' rights.
  • Conservation of Genetic Resources: Facilitates the accurate documentation and conservation of plant genetic resources, preventing the loss of valuable traits.

Challenges and Limitations

Despite its benefits, DNA fingerprinting faces some challenges:

  • Cost: DNA fingerprinting analysis can be expensive, particularly for small breeders and farmers.
  • Technical Expertise: Requires skilled personnel and specialized equipment, which may not be readily available in all regions.
  • Marker Selection: Selecting appropriate DNA markers that accurately reflect the genetic differences between varieties can be complex.
  • Database Management: Maintaining a comprehensive and accurate database of DNA fingerprints is essential for effective enforcement and requires significant resources.

Case Study: Basmati Rice

The "Basmati" rice variety has been a subject of considerable legal dispute, with various entities claiming its ownership. DNA fingerprinting has been instrumental in resolving these disputes by providing scientific evidence to establish the distinctiveness and origin of different Basmati strains. Courts have relied on DNA fingerprinting data to determine the authenticity of Basmati rice and prevent fraudulent marketing.

Aspect Before DNA Fingerprinting After DNA Fingerprinting
Variety Identification Subjective, based on morphological traits Objective, based on genetic markers
IP Protection Difficult to enforce Stronger legal basis
Dispute Resolution Lengthy and complex Faster and more accurate

Future Directions

Future advancements should focus on developing more cost-effective DNA fingerprinting methods, expanding the database of plant variety fingerprints, and integrating DNA fingerprinting with other data sources, such as phenotypic data, for a more comprehensive assessment of variety distinctiveness.

Conclusion

DNA fingerprinting is an indispensable tool in the Indian agricultural landscape, particularly for ensuring the integrity of the plant variety registration process under the PPV&FR Act, 2001. While challenges remain regarding cost and technical expertise, its benefits in terms of accurate identification, IP protection, and conservation of genetic resources are undeniable. Continued investment in technology and infrastructure is crucial to maximize the potential of DNA fingerprinting and safeguard India's agricultural biodiversity and the rights of both breeders and farmers.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms)
SNPs are variations at a single nucleotide position in a DNA sequence. They are commonly used as markers in DNA fingerprinting.
PPV&FR Act
The Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001, is an Indian act that governs the protection of plant varieties and the rights of farmers.

Key Statistics

India is one of the 12 megabiodiversity countries in the world, possessing around 11% of the world’s plant species diversity. (Source: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change)

Source: MoEFCC

The cost of DNA fingerprinting can range from INR 5,000 to INR 20,000 per variety, depending on the complexity of the analysis and the laboratory involved. (Knowledge cutoff)

Source: Based on general knowledge and industry reports

Examples

Turmeric (Curcuma longa)

The ‘Haldi’ turmeric variety dispute between the Council of Science & Industrial Research (CSIR) and Narayanan Nadkarni involved DNA fingerprinting to establish the distinctiveness of the turmeric variety.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is DNA fingerprinting preferred over traditional methods for variety registration?

Traditional methods rely on morphological traits which can be subjective and influenced by environmental factors. DNA fingerprinting provides an objective and reliable genetic signature, minimizing errors and ensuring accuracy.

Topics Covered

BiologyLawGeneticsIntellectual PropertyMolecular Biology