UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II201320 Marks250 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q25.

Discuss alternatives for shifting cultivators in the context of ecological costs and humanistic concerns.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of shifting cultivation (jhum) and its implications. The approach should be to first define shifting cultivation and its ecological and societal context. Then, discuss alternatives, categorizing them into agronomic, economic, and social interventions. Critically analyze each alternative considering both ecological sustainability and the livelihoods of shifting cultivators. Finally, emphasize the need for a holistic, participatory approach that respects humanistic concerns. Structure: Intro, Ecological Costs & Humanistic Concerns, Alternatives (Agro, Eco, Social), Conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Shifting cultivation, also known as jhum or ladang, is an age-old agricultural practice prevalent in many parts of India, particularly in the Northeast and parts of Central India. It involves clearing forest land, cultivating it for a short period (typically 1-3 years), and then abandoning it to allow for natural regeneration. While historically sustainable, increased population pressure and land scarcity have led to shorter fallow periods, causing significant ecological degradation. This practice also impacts the livelihoods and cultural identity of numerous tribal communities. Addressing the challenges necessitates finding alternatives that balance ecological sustainability with the humanistic concerns of these communities.

Ecological Costs and Humanistic Concerns

The ecological costs of unsustainable shifting cultivation are significant. Shortened fallow periods lead to soil erosion, nutrient depletion, loss of biodiversity, and increased vulnerability to climate change. Deforestation contributes to greenhouse gas emissions and disrupts local ecosystems. Humanistic concerns revolve around the displacement and marginalization of shifting cultivators, loss of traditional knowledge, and erosion of cultural identity intrinsically linked to the practice.

Alternatives for Shifting Cultivators

Alternatives can be broadly categorized into agronomic, economic, and social interventions.

Agro-Ecological Alternatives

  • Terraced Farming: Construction of terraces on slopes reduces soil erosion and allows for cultivation on previously unusable land.
  • Agroforestry: Integrating trees with crops provides shade, improves soil fertility, and offers diverse income sources.
  • Conservation Agriculture: Practices like no-till farming, crop rotation, and mulching enhance soil health and water retention.
  • Integrated Farming Systems (IFS): Combining crop production with livestock rearing (poultry, fish, etc.) maximizes resource utilization and reduces dependency on external inputs.
  • Improved Fallow Management: Promoting longer fallow periods with tree planting and soil conservation measures.

Economic Alternatives

  • Skill Development & Employment Generation: Providing training in non-agricultural sectors (tourism, handicrafts, horticulture) can diversify income sources.
  • Micro-enterprises: Supporting the establishment of small-scale businesses based on local resources (e.g., medicinal plants, NTFPs).
  • Value Addition: Processing agricultural produce to increase its market value.
  • Forest-based Livelihoods: Sustainable harvesting and processing of Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) under community management.

Social Alternatives

  • Land Rights & Security: Ensuring secure land tenure for shifting cultivators is crucial for long-term planning and investment. The Forest Rights Act, 2006, is a vital step in this direction.
  • Community Participation: Involving local communities in the planning and implementation of alternative livelihood programs is essential for their success.
  • Traditional Knowledge Integration: Recognizing and incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into sustainable agriculture practices.
  • Education & Awareness: Promoting awareness about the ecological and economic benefits of sustainable alternatives.
Alternative Ecological Benefit Humanistic Benefit
Agroforestry Improved soil health, biodiversity conservation Diversified income, cultural preservation
Skill Development N/A Increased employment opportunities, reduced dependency on jhum
Forest Rights Act Implementation Sustainable forest management Secure land tenure, empowerment of tribal communities

Case Study: The Van Dhan Yojana Scheme

The Van Dhan Yojana scheme, launched in 2018, aims to empower tribal communities by promoting the sustainable harvesting and processing of forest produce. It involves establishing Van Dhan Kendras (VDKs) which are tribal-led enterprises that process forest produce and add value. This creates income generation opportunities while preserving the forest ecosystem. The scheme aligns with the broader goal of providing alternatives to shifting cultivation.

Challenges

Implementation challenges include resistance to change, lack of access to credit and markets, and inadequate infrastructure. A ‘top-down’ approach often fails to address the specific needs and preferences of shifting cultivators.

Conclusion

Addressing the challenges of shifting cultivation requires a holistic and participatory approach that prioritizes both ecological sustainability and humanistic concerns. While agronomic alternatives like agroforestry and terracing offer promise, their success hinges on economic empowerment and secure land tenure. Schemes like Van Dhan Yojana represent a step in the right direction but need to be carefully implemented with community involvement. Ultimately, the transition away from shifting cultivation must be gradual, equitable, and respectful of the cultural identity and traditional knowledge of the communities involved.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Jhum Cultivation
A type of shifting cultivation practiced in Northeast India and other parts of the world, involving clearing forest land, cultivation, and a long fallow period.
NTFP
Non-Timber Forest Products: Products derived from forests other than timber, such as medicinal plants, fruits, and resins.

Key Statistics

Approximately 4.4 million hectares of forest land in India is under shifting cultivation, primarily in the Northeast region. (Source: Ministry of Tribal Affairs, knowledge cutoff)

Source: Knowledge Cutoff

The Forest Rights Act, 2006, has empowered over 1.6 crore tribal people and forest dwellers by granting them rights over forest land and resources. (Source: Ministry of Tribal Affairs, knowledge cutoff)

Source: Knowledge Cutoff

Examples

Mizoram’s Integrated Basin Development Approach

Mizoram state has adopted an integrated basin development approach to address environmental degradation and improve the livelihoods of shifting cultivators through a combination of agroforestry, watershed management, and livelihood diversification programs.

Nagaland’s Mission for Integrated Development of Tribal Areas (MIDTA)

MIDTA focuses on improving infrastructure, education, health, and livelihood opportunities in tribal areas, contributing to a gradual shift away from unsustainable jhum cultivation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is it difficult to completely eliminate shifting cultivation?

Shifting cultivation is deeply intertwined with the cultural identity and traditional livelihoods of many tribal communities. Complete elimination without providing viable and culturally appropriate alternatives is not feasible.

What role does the Forest Rights Act play in addressing shifting cultivation?

The FRA recognizes the rights of forest dwellers, providing them with security of tenure and a stake in sustainable forest management, which can incentivize them to adopt more sustainable practices.

Topics Covered

EnvironmentSocietyAgricultureSustainable AgricultureTribal LivelihoodsEcological ImpactForestry