Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The assertion "One must do what he thinks best" encapsulates a powerful notion of individual autonomy and moral agency. It suggests that personal conviction should be the ultimate guiding principle in decision-making. However, this seemingly straightforward statement raises profound ethical questions. While prioritizing one’s own judgment is crucial for personal integrity and innovation, a purely subjective approach can potentially disregard broader societal implications and ethical obligations. This answer will explore the validity of this statement, examining its strengths and weaknesses within the context of individual responsibility and collective well-being.
The Case for Individual Judgment
The statement finds support in several philosophical traditions. Kant’s categorical imperative, while emphasizing universalizability, acknowledges the importance of rational individuals acting according to principles they deem morally correct. Similarly, John Stuart Mill’s harm principle, a cornerstone of liberal thought, advocates for individual liberty as long as it doesn’t harm others. In practical terms, relying on one’s own judgment fosters innovation and progress. Throughout history, individuals who challenged conventional wisdom – like Galileo Galilei or Marie Curie – did so because they believed in the validity of their own observations and reasoning.
- Moral Courage: Acting on one’s convictions, even in the face of opposition, demonstrates moral courage and integrity.
- Personal Responsibility: Taking ownership of one’s decisions, based on personal beliefs, promotes accountability.
- Authenticity: Living in accordance with one’s values leads to a more authentic and fulfilling life.
The Limitations and Potential Dangers
However, the statement is not without its limitations. Unfettered individual judgment can lead to ethical dilemmas and societal harm. The concept of moral relativism, which suggests that morality is subjective and varies across cultures, highlights the potential for conflicting “best” actions. Furthermore, ignoring established ethical frameworks and legal norms can have detrimental consequences.
The Problem of Subjectivity
What one person deems “best” may be harmful or unjust to others. For example, a business owner might believe maximizing profits is “best” for their company, but this could come at the expense of worker safety or environmental sustainability. Similarly, an individual’s personal beliefs about social issues could lead to discriminatory practices.
The Need for Accountability
The statement lacks a crucial element: accountability. While individuals should exercise their judgment, they must also be held responsible for the consequences of their actions. A purely subjective approach can create a moral loophole, allowing individuals to justify harmful behavior by claiming they were simply doing what they thought best. The Nuremberg trials (1945-1949) serve as a stark reminder of the dangers of individuals claiming they were “just following orders” or acting on their own convictions without regard for universal moral principles.
Finding a Balance: Conscience and Consequences
A more nuanced approach recognizes the importance of both individual judgment and collective responsibility. Individuals should strive to make informed decisions based on their values, but they must also consider the potential consequences of their actions and their impact on others. This requires a commitment to critical thinking, empathy, and a willingness to engage in dialogue with those who hold different perspectives. The concept of deliberative democracy, which emphasizes reasoned discussion and consensus-building, offers a framework for navigating complex ethical dilemmas.
| Individual Judgment | Collective Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Promotes autonomy and innovation | Ensures fairness and justice |
| Fosters personal integrity | Protects vulnerable groups |
| Encourages moral courage | Maintains social order |
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the statement "One must do what he thinks best" highlights the importance of individual conscience and moral agency, it is an incomplete ethical principle. A responsible and ethical life requires a balance between personal conviction and consideration for the well-being of others. Individuals should strive to act in accordance with their values, but they must also be accountable for the consequences of their actions and willing to engage in constructive dialogue to navigate the complexities of the moral landscape. Ultimately, true ethical leadership involves not simply doing what one *thinks* is best, but striving to determine what *is* best for all stakeholders involved.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.