Infotech Company: Misconduct & Resignation

You are the Executive Director of an upcoming Infotech Company which is making a name for itself in the market. Mr. A, who is a star performer, is heading the marketing team. In a short period of one year, he has helped in doubling the revenues as well as creating a high brand equity for the Company so much so that you are thinking of promoting him. However, you have been receiving information from many corners about his attitude towards the female colleagues; particularly his habit of making loose comments on women. In addition, he regularly sends indecent SMS's to all the team members including his female colleagues. One day, late in the evening, Mrs. X, who is one of Mr. A's team members, comes to you visibly disturbed. She complains against the continued misconduct of Mr. A, who has been making undesirable advances towards her and has even tried to touch her inappropriately in his cabin. She tenders her resignation and leaves your office.

How to Approach

This question tests ethical decision-making in a corporate setting, specifically addressing sexual harassment and its implications. The answer should demonstrate understanding of relevant laws (POSH Act), ethical principles (integrity, fairness, accountability), and the importance of a safe work environment. Structure the answer by first acknowledging the gravity of the situation, then outlining the steps to be taken – immediate support for the victim, investigation, disciplinary action, and preventative measures. Focus on balancing the company’s interests with the ethical obligations towards its employees.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The workplace is increasingly recognized as a space demanding not only professional competence but also ethical conduct and respect. The recent enactment of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act, 2013, underscores the legal and moral imperative to create a safe and inclusive work environment. This case presents a complex ethical dilemma for an executive director, balancing the potential loss of a high-performing employee with the fundamental right of an employee to a dignified and harassment-free workplace. The situation demands immediate and decisive action, prioritizing the well-being of the victim and upholding the company’s ethical standards.

Understanding the Ethical Dimensions

The core ethical issues at play are: sexual harassment, abuse of power, workplace safety, and corporate social responsibility. Mr. A’s behavior constitutes a clear violation of ethical norms and potentially breaches the POSH Act, 2013. Ignoring the complaints or prioritizing revenue over employee well-being would be a grave ethical lapse, damaging the company’s reputation and potentially leading to legal repercussions.

Immediate Actions & Support for the Victim

Mrs. X’s resignation, tendered in a state of distress, necessitates immediate attention. While she has resigned, the company still has a moral and potentially legal obligation to address the situation. The following steps are crucial:

Acknowledge and Validate: Express sincere empathy and acknowledge the seriousness of her complaint.
Offer Support: Offer counseling services and legal assistance, even though she has resigned.
Ensure Confidentiality: Maintain strict confidentiality regarding her complaint and personal information.
Document Everything: Meticulously document all interactions and information received.

Investigation Process

A thorough, impartial, and time-bound investigation is paramount. This should be conducted by an Internal Committee (IC) as mandated by the POSH Act, 2013. The IC must comprise of at least 50% women and include members from different departments. The investigation should include:

Gathering Evidence: Interviewing Mrs. X, Mr. A, and any potential witnesses.
Reviewing Evidence: Examining SMS records, emails, and any other relevant documentation.
Maintaining Impartiality: Ensuring the investigation is free from bias and conducted fairly.
Providing Due Process: Giving Mr. A a fair opportunity to respond to the allegations.

Disciplinary Action & Preventative Measures

Based on the investigation’s findings, appropriate disciplinary action must be taken. If the allegations are substantiated, Mr. A’s actions warrant severe consequences, potentially including termination of employment. However, even if the evidence is inconclusive, a strong message must be sent that such behavior will not be tolerated. Furthermore, the company should implement the following preventative measures:

Robust POSH Policy: Develop and implement a comprehensive POSH policy, clearly outlining prohibited behaviors, reporting procedures, and consequences.
Regular Training: Conduct mandatory training for all employees, including management, on the POSH Act, sexual harassment awareness, and bystander intervention.
Establish a Grievance Redressal Mechanism: Ensure a readily accessible and confidential grievance redressal mechanism is in place.
Promote a Culture of Respect: Foster a workplace culture that values respect, inclusivity, and ethical conduct.

Balancing Business Interests with Ethical Obligations

While Mr. A’s contributions to the company are significant, they cannot justify overlooking his misconduct. Prioritizing short-term profits over the safety and well-being of employees is ethically indefensible and ultimately detrimental to the company’s long-term success. A strong ethical foundation builds trust, enhances reputation, and attracts and retains talent. The company should actively seek a replacement for Mr. A who embodies both professional competence and ethical integrity.

Conclusion

This situation demands a firm commitment to ethical principles and legal compliance. By prioritizing the well-being of Mrs. X, conducting a thorough investigation, and implementing robust preventative measures, the company can demonstrate its commitment to creating a safe, respectful, and inclusive work environment. While losing a high performer is regrettable, upholding ethical standards is paramount and will ultimately strengthen the company’s reputation and long-term sustainability. A proactive approach to preventing harassment is not merely a legal obligation but a moral imperative.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Bystander Intervention

Bystander intervention refers to the act of intervening in a situation where harassment is occurring, either by directly addressing the harasser, supporting the victim, or reporting the incident.

Key Statistics

According to a 2021 study by the Indian National Bar Association (INBA), approximately 60% of women in India have experienced workplace harassment.

Source: Indian National Bar Association (INBA) - 2021

A 2019 report by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) showed a 14% increase in cases of crimes against women in the workplace compared to the previous year.

Source: National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) - 2019 (Knowledge Cutoff)

Examples

The Infosys Case (2017)

Infosys faced scrutiny after allegations of sexual harassment surfaced against some of its senior executives. The company was criticized for its handling of the complaints and faced reputational damage. This case highlighted the importance of a robust and transparent grievance redressal mechanism.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶What if the investigation finds no conclusive evidence of misconduct?

Even without conclusive evidence, the company should address the concerns raised and reinforce its commitment to a respectful workplace. Counseling and sensitivity training for Mr. A and his team could be considered, along with a clear message that any future complaints will be taken seriously.

Topics Covered

EthicsBusinessHuman ResourcesWorkplace HarassmentAccountabilityIntegrity

Back to all GENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-IV 2013 questions