UPSC MainsGEOLOGY-PAPER-II201315 Marks
Q20.

Explain the ore forming processes that result in chromite and Ni-Cu sulphide deposits hosted by ultramafic rocks.

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed understanding of petrogenesis and ore deposit formation, specifically focusing on ultramafic rocks. The answer should explain the geological processes leading to the formation of chromite and Ni-Cu sulphide deposits, highlighting the differences and similarities in their formation mechanisms. Structure the answer by first defining ultramafic rocks, then detailing chromite formation, followed by Ni-Cu sulphide formation, and finally comparing the processes. Include relevant examples and geological settings.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Ultramafic rocks, characterized by being rich in magnesium and iron, represent a significant portion of the Earth’s mantle and are often found in ophiolites and layered intrusions. These rocks are crucial hosts for economically important ore deposits, notably chromite and nickel-copper (Ni-Cu) sulphide mineralization. Chromite is a primary source of chromium, essential for stainless steel production, while Ni-Cu sulphide deposits are vital for obtaining nickel and copper, critical metals for modern technologies. The formation of these deposits is intricately linked to the magmatic processes associated with ultramafic magma generation and evolution.

Ultramafic Rocks: A Foundation for Ore Formation

Ultramafic rocks are igneous rocks composed predominantly of olivine and pyroxene. Common types include peridotite, dunite, and harzburgite. They originate from the partial melting of the Earth’s mantle. Their high magnesium content and reducing conditions are fundamental to the formation of both chromite and Ni-Cu sulphide deposits.

Chromite Formation in Ultramafic Rocks

Chromite ((Fe,Mg)Cr2O4) formation in ultramafic rocks is primarily a magmatic process, occurring during the crystallization of mantle-derived magmas. Several models explain its genesis:

  • Liquid Immiscibility: This model suggests that chromite crystallizes from an immiscible silicate melt enriched in chromium. This immiscibility occurs at high temperatures and pressures within the mantle or lower crust.
  • Fractional Crystallization: As ultramafic magma cools, early-formed olivine and pyroxene remove magnesium and iron, concentrating chromium in the residual melt. When the melt reaches a critical chromium concentration, chromite precipitates.
  • Chromium-Rich Fluid Transport: Chromium can be transported as a complex with chloride ions in a fluid phase, which then precipitates chromite upon encountering favorable conditions (e.g., a change in temperature or pressure).

Chromite deposits are often found in layered intrusions like the Bushveld Complex (South Africa) and the Stillwater Complex (USA), where fractional crystallization played a dominant role. Podiform chromitites, found in ophiolites, are thought to form through liquid immiscibility and subsequent gravitational settling of chromite crystals.

Ni-Cu Sulphide Formation in Ultramafic Rocks

Ni-Cu sulphide deposits associated with ultramafic rocks are typically classified as magmatic sulphide deposits. Their formation involves a more complex interplay of factors than chromite formation:

  • Sulphur Saturation: The ultramafic magma must become saturated in sulphur. This can occur through assimilation of sulphur-rich crustal rocks (e.g., sedimentary rocks) or through mantle degassing.
  • Liquid Immiscibility (S-rich melt): Once sulphur saturation is achieved, an immiscible sulphide liquid forms. This sulphide liquid scavenges nickel and copper from the silicate magma. The key is the partitioning of Ni and Cu into the sulphide melt, which is significantly higher than in the silicate melt.
  • Magma Conduit Geometry: The geometry of the magma conduit influences sulphide accumulation. Constrictions or changes in flow direction can cause sulphide droplets to coalesce and settle, forming massive sulphide lenses.
  • Post-Magmatic Processes: Hydrothermal alteration and remobilization can further concentrate Ni and Cu in the deposit.

Notable examples include the Sudbury Igneous Complex (Canada) and the Norilsk-Talnakh deposits (Russia). These deposits are often associated with impact structures or rift zones, which facilitated magma upwelling and crustal contamination.

Comparison of Chromite and Ni-Cu Sulphide Formation

Feature Chromite Formation Ni-Cu Sulphide Formation
Primary Control Chromium concentration & crystallization Sulphur saturation & immiscibility
Key Elements Cr, Fe, Mg Ni, Cu, S, Fe
Typical Settings Layered intrusions, ophiolites Layered intrusions, rift zones, impact structures
Magmatic Process Fractional crystallization, liquid immiscibility Liquid immiscibility, magma conduit geometry

Conclusion

In conclusion, both chromite and Ni-Cu sulphide deposits in ultramafic rocks are products of magmatic processes, but they differ significantly in their requirements and mechanisms. Chromite formation is primarily controlled by chromium concentration and crystallization, while Ni-Cu sulphide formation hinges on sulphur saturation and the formation of an immiscible sulphide liquid. Understanding these processes is crucial for effective exploration and resource management of these economically important ore deposits. Future research should focus on refining models of sulphur sources and magma conduit dynamics to improve predictive capabilities.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Ophiolite
A section of oceanic crust and upper mantle that has been uplifted and exposed on land, often preserving a complete sequence of rocks from the mantle to the seafloor sediments.
Fractional Crystallization
A process where minerals crystallize sequentially from a cooling magma, altering the composition of the remaining melt. Early-forming minerals remove certain elements, concentrating others in the residual melt.

Key Statistics

South Africa holds approximately 70% of the world’s chromite reserves (as of 2022).

Source: US Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries 2023

Global nickel reserves are estimated to be around 94 million metric tons (as of 2023).

Source: Statista, Nickel worldwide reserves 2023

Examples

Bushveld Complex

The Bushveld Complex in South Africa is the world’s largest layered igneous intrusion and a major source of both chromite and platinum group elements (PGEs). Its layered structure facilitated the concentration of these metals during fractional crystallization.

Frequently Asked Questions

What role does plate tectonics play in the formation of these deposits?

Plate tectonics provides the geological setting for ultramafic magma generation. Subduction zones can introduce sulphur into the mantle, while rift zones facilitate magma upwelling and crustal contamination, both crucial for sulphide deposit formation. Ophiolites, formed at divergent plate boundaries, are important hosts for podiform chromitites.

Topics Covered

GeologyEconomic GeologyOre GenesisMagmatic ProcessesUltramafic Rocks