UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-I201315 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q21.

Analyze how the political process of state formation of Mewar from 10th-15th century CE was challenged in the 16th century CE by the imperialist policy of Akbar.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of Mewar’s political evolution from the 10th to the 15th centuries and how Akbar’s imperial policies directly challenged its established structures. The answer should trace Mewar’s state formation, highlighting its unique features (clan-based polity, Rajput honor code), and then analyze how Akbar’s policies – particularly those related to mansabdari, religious policy, and marriage alliances – undermined Mewar’s autonomy and traditional power dynamics. A chronological approach, focusing on key events and figures (Rana Sanga, Maharana Pratap, Akbar’s generals) is recommended.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Sisodia Rajputs of Mewar, from the 10th to the 15th century, carved out a distinct political identity in Rajasthan, characterized by a decentralized clan-based structure, a strong emphasis on Rajput honor ( *izzat*), and a tradition of resisting external domination. This period witnessed the consolidation of Mewar as a regional power, often in conflict with neighboring states and the Delhi Sultanate. However, the arrival of the Mughals under Akbar in the 16th century presented an unprecedented challenge. Akbar’s sophisticated imperial policy, encompassing military conquest, political maneuvering, and cultural accommodation, directly targeted the foundations of Mewar’s political system, initiating a prolonged struggle for independence that defined the region for decades.

Mewar’s Political Formation (10th-15th Century CE)

The foundations of Mewar’s political structure were laid during the 10th and 11th centuries with the rise of the Guhilas. Initially vassals of the Pratiharas, they gradually asserted their independence. Key features of this period included:

  • Decentralized Polity: Mewar wasn’t a highly centralized state. Power was distributed among various clans (*biradari*) and chiefs (*umraos*), who owed allegiance to the ruling Rana but enjoyed considerable autonomy in their respective territories.
  • Rajput Honor Code (*Izzat*): The concept of *izzat* – honor, prestige, and reputation – was central to Rajput society and politics. Maintaining *izzat* often took precedence over pragmatic considerations, influencing military decisions and political alliances.
  • Military Organization: Mewar’s military strength rested on its cavalry, composed of Rajput warriors renowned for their bravery and martial skills. Fortified hill forts played a crucial role in defense.
  • Economic Base: Agriculture and trade formed the economic backbone of Mewar. Control over mineral resources, particularly zinc and iron, also contributed to its wealth.

Akbar’s Imperial Policy and its Impact on Mewar

Akbar’s policy towards Rajput states was multifaceted, aiming for both submission and integration. However, Mewar, under Rana Sanga and later Maharana Pratap, consistently resisted Mughal domination. The key elements of Akbar’s policy and their impact on Mewar are detailed below:

1. Military Conquest and Subjugation

Akbar’s initial attempts to subdue Mewar involved military campaigns. The Battle of Haldighati (1576) between Maharana Pratap and Akbar’s general Man Singh is a pivotal event. While the Mughals technically won, Pratap’s escape and continued resistance demonstrated Mewar’s defiance. The battle, though indecisive, severely weakened Mewar’s military capabilities.

2. The Mansabdari System

Akbar’s *mansabdari* system, a hierarchical ranking of officials based on military and civil duties, was designed to integrate Rajput chiefs into the Mughal administration. Many Rajput clans accepted *mansabs*, gaining access to Mughal court and resources. However, Mewar staunchly refused to participate, viewing it as a compromise of their sovereignty. This refusal isolated Mewar politically and economically.

3. Religious Policy and Accommodation

Akbar’s policy of *Sulh-i-Kul* (universal peace) aimed to foster religious tolerance and harmony. While this policy attracted some Rajput rulers, Mewar’s rulers, deeply rooted in their traditional Hindu beliefs, remained wary of Mughal religious influence. They perceived Akbar’s religious innovations as a threat to their cultural identity.

4. Marriage Alliances

Akbar actively pursued marriage alliances with Rajput princesses to cement political ties. Several Rajput rulers willingly offered their daughters’ hands in marriage to Mughal princes. However, Mewar consistently refused to enter into such alliances, considering it a sign of submission. This refusal further strained relations with the Mughal empire.

5. Economic Warfare

Akbar employed economic warfare to weaken Mewar. Mughal forces systematically plundered Mewar’s territories, disrupted trade routes, and destroyed agricultural infrastructure. This economic pressure aimed to force Mewar into submission by undermining its resource base.

The Prolonged Resistance and its Consequences

Maharana Pratap’s relentless resistance, despite facing overwhelming odds, became a symbol of Rajput valor and defiance. He waged a guerilla war against the Mughals for decades, utilizing Mewar’s rugged terrain to his advantage. However, the prolonged conflict took a heavy toll on Mewar’s economy and population. The Mughal pressure continued even after Pratap’s death in 1597, with his successors eventually negotiating a compromise with Jahangir in 1615, accepting Mughal suzerainty but retaining internal autonomy.

Aspect Mewar (10th-15th Century) Akbar’s Imperial Policy Impact on Mewar
Political Structure Decentralized, Clan-based Centralized, Bureaucratic (Mansabdari) Undermined clan autonomy, fostered political isolation
Military Strategy Conventional Warfare, Fortified Defenses Combined Arms, Siege Warfare, Guerilla Warfare (response) Initial military setbacks, prolonged guerilla conflict
Religious Outlook Traditional Hinduism Religious Tolerance (*Sulh-i-Kul*) Perceived threat to cultural identity, resistance to religious influence
Economic Base Agriculture, Trade, Mineral Resources Economic Warfare, Disruption of Trade Economic hardship, weakened resource base

Conclusion

Akbar’s imperial policy fundamentally challenged the political process of state formation in Mewar. While Mewar’s inherent political structure and the strong emphasis on *izzat* fueled its resistance, the Mughals’ superior military strength, sophisticated administrative system, and economic pressure gradually eroded Mewar’s autonomy. The prolonged conflict, though ultimately resulting in a compromise, left a lasting impact on Mewar’s political landscape, forcing it to adapt to a new reality under Mughal suzerainty. The story of Mewar’s resistance remains a powerful testament to the enduring spirit of independence and the complexities of imperial expansion in medieval India.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Mansabdari System
A system of ranking officials in the Mughal administration, based on their military and civil duties. Mansabdars were assigned a rank (mansab) that determined their salary, the number of troops they were required to maintain, and their position in the imperial hierarchy.
Sulh-i-Kul
A policy of universal peace and tolerance promoted by Akbar, aiming to reconcile different religious communities and foster harmony within the Mughal empire.

Key Statistics

The Battle of Haldighati (1576) is estimated to have involved around 20,000 Mughal troops led by Man Singh against approximately 3,000-5,000 Mewar forces led by Maharana Pratap.

Source: Satish Chandra, *Mughal India* (2005)

According to Mughal chronicles, the annual revenue of Mewar before the Mughal invasions was estimated to be around 3.5 million *dam* (a silver coin).

Source: Abu’l-Fazl, *Ain-i-Akbari* (1598)

Examples

Amber’s Submission

The Rajput kingdom of Amber (Jaipur) readily accepted Mughal suzerainty and entered into marriage alliances with the Mughals, demonstrating a contrasting approach to Akbar’s policy compared to Mewar. This resulted in Amber gaining significant political and economic benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Mewar resist the Mughals so fiercely?

Mewar’s resistance stemmed from its strong tradition of independence, the deeply ingrained Rajput code of honor (*izzat*), and a reluctance to compromise its sovereignty by accepting Mughal suzerainty or participating in the *mansabdari* system.

Topics Covered

Medieval HistoryPoliticsMilitary HistoryMewarAkbarState FormationImperialism