Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The question of God’s existence has been a central concern in philosophy and religion for centuries. While various arguments attempt to demonstrate God’s existence – such as the cosmological, teleological, and ontological arguments – these are often met with counter-arguments challenging their validity. These objections often center around perceived inconsistencies between the attributes traditionally ascribed to God (omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence) and the realities of the world, particularly the existence of suffering. This response will discuss two main objections against arguments for the existence of God and evaluate whether theists offer satisfactory answers.
The Problem of Evil
Perhaps the most potent objection to the existence of a benevolent, omnipotent, and omniscient God is the problem of evil. This argument posits that the existence of gratuitous evil – suffering that serves no discernible purpose – is incompatible with the existence of such a God. If God is all-powerful, He could prevent evil; if He is all-knowing, He would know about it; and if He is all-good, He would want to prevent it. The fact that evil exists, therefore, suggests that at least one of these attributes must be false, or that God does not exist.
Theistic responses to this objection are varied. The free will defense, popularized by Alvin Plantinga, argues that God values free will so highly that He allows humans to choose evil, even though it results in suffering. Another response, the soul-making theodicy (Irenaeus and Hick), suggests that suffering is necessary for moral and spiritual development. Evil provides opportunities for growth, compassion, and the refinement of character. A third response points to the limitations of human understanding – we cannot comprehend God’s plan and therefore cannot judge whether suffering is truly gratuitous.
The Logical Problem of Evil & Inconsistent Revelations
A stronger version of the problem of evil is the logical problem of evil, articulated by J.L. Mackie. This argument claims that the very concept of an omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent God is logically incoherent. Mackie argues that if God possesses these attributes, then the absence of evil is logically necessary. The existence of evil, therefore, logically disproves God’s existence. This is a more forceful claim than simply questioning the *reasonableness* of belief in God.
Another objection arises from the diversity and apparent contradictions within religious revelations. Different religions offer conflicting accounts of God’s nature, will, and requirements. For example, the concept of reincarnation in Hinduism clashes with the Abrahamic religions’ emphasis on a single lifetime and final judgment. If God truly revealed Himself to humanity, why would these revelations be so inconsistent? This raises questions about the reliability of religious experience and the validity of religious claims.
Theists respond to inconsistent revelations in several ways. Religious pluralism suggests that different religions represent different paths to the same ultimate reality. Another approach emphasizes the limitations of human language and understanding – God’s truth may be ineffable and therefore expressed differently across cultures. Furthermore, some theists argue that apparent contradictions are due to misinterpretations or distortions of the original revelation. However, these responses often rely on subjective interpretations and fail to provide a definitive resolution to the problem of conflicting claims.
Comparing Theistic Responses
| Objection | Theistic Response | Evaluation |
|---|---|---|
| Problem of Evil (Evidential) | Free Will Defense | Addresses some suffering, but struggles with natural evil (e.g., earthquakes). |
| Problem of Evil (Evidential) | Soul-Making Theodicy | Can be seen as justifying immense suffering, raising ethical concerns. |
| Logical Problem of Evil | Rejection of the coherence of the attributes | Requires abandoning traditional conceptions of God. |
| Inconsistent Revelations | Religious Pluralism | Can be seen as relativizing truth and undermining the uniqueness of any particular faith. |
Conclusion
The objections to the existence of God, particularly the problem of evil and the issue of inconsistent revelations, pose significant challenges to theistic belief. While theists have offered various responses, none are universally accepted as fully satisfactory. The free will defense and soul-making theodicy address some aspects of the problem of evil, but struggle with its scale and gratuitousness. Responses to inconsistent revelations often rely on subjective interpretations. Ultimately, the question of God’s existence remains a matter of faith and philosophical debate, with compelling arguments on both sides.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.