Dalvoy Logo
Dalvoy
UPSC MainsPSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-II201310 Marks150 Words
Q3.

"In the globalized public administration, hierarchy creates more ethical problems than it solves ...." Comment.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the interplay between hierarchical structures, ethical considerations, and the forces of globalization in public administration. The answer should avoid a simplistic 'yes' or 'no' response. It needs to acknowledge the traditional benefits of hierarchy (control, accountability) while critically examining how globalization introduces new ethical challenges that hierarchy often exacerbates. Structure the answer by first defining globalization's impact on public administration, then outlining how hierarchy traditionally addresses ethical concerns, and finally, detailing how globalization creates ethical dilemmas that hierarchy struggles to resolve, potentially worsening them. Use examples to illustrate your points.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Globalization, characterized by increased interconnectedness and interdependence, has profoundly reshaped public administration. It has introduced complexities like transnational corruption, regulatory arbitrage, and the need for cross-cultural ethical frameworks. Traditionally, public administration relied heavily on hierarchical structures to ensure accountability, maintain order, and enforce ethical standards. However, the very nature of globalization – its fluidity, speed, and reach – challenges the effectiveness of these traditional hierarchical controls. This essay will argue that while hierarchy isn’t inherently unethical, in the context of globalized public administration, it often creates more ethical problems than it solves, due to its inherent limitations in addressing the novel challenges posed by a borderless world.

The Traditional Role of Hierarchy in Ethical Public Administration

Hierarchy, in its classical Weberian form, provides a clear chain of command, facilitating accountability and control. It establishes clear lines of responsibility, making it easier to identify and address misconduct. Formal rules and procedures, enforced through hierarchical structures, aim to ensure impartiality and fairness. For instance, the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) operates on a hierarchical model, with established procedures for reporting corruption and misconduct, theoretically ensuring ethical conduct. However, this system relies on effective oversight and a culture of integrity, which are often compromised in practice.

Globalization and the Emergence of New Ethical Challenges

Globalization introduces a range of ethical dilemmas that traditional hierarchies are ill-equipped to handle:

  • Transnational Corruption: Globalization facilitates cross-border financial flows, making it easier to conceal illicit funds and engage in bribery. Hierarchical structures within national administrations struggle to investigate and prosecute such crimes effectively, often lacking jurisdiction or cooperation from other nations.
  • Regulatory Arbitrage: Companies exploit differences in regulations across countries to minimize costs and maximize profits, sometimes at the expense of ethical standards. Hierarchical regulatory bodies within individual nations find it difficult to counter this trend without international coordination.
  • Cultural Relativism: Globalization exposes public administrators to diverse cultural norms and values, creating ethical dilemmas when these conflict with national laws or ethical codes. A rigid hierarchical structure may struggle to accommodate such complexities.
  • Digital Divide & Data Ethics: The rapid advancement of technology and the digital divide raise ethical concerns regarding data privacy, algorithmic bias, and equitable access to digital services. Hierarchical structures often lack the agility and expertise to address these evolving challenges.

How Hierarchy Exacerbates Ethical Problems in a Globalized World

Instead of mitigating ethical risks, hierarchy can often amplify them in the context of globalization:

  • Information Asymmetry: Hierarchical structures can create information silos, hindering transparency and accountability. Subordinates may be reluctant to report misconduct to superiors for fear of retribution, especially in cultures with strong power distance.
  • Lack of Responsiveness: Hierarchical decision-making processes can be slow and inflexible, making it difficult to respond effectively to rapidly changing global challenges.
  • Bureaucratic Inertia: Established hierarchies can resist innovation and adaptation, hindering the development of new ethical frameworks and regulatory mechanisms needed to address globalization’s complexities.
  • Increased Opportunities for Abuse of Power: The concentration of power within hierarchical structures can create opportunities for corruption and abuse of authority, particularly in countries with weak governance systems.

Example: The 2G Spectrum Allocation Scam (2010) in India demonstrated how a hierarchical structure, coupled with a lack of transparency and accountability, facilitated large-scale corruption. The decision-making process was concentrated within a small group of officials, creating opportunities for collusion and abuse of power.

Traditional Hierarchy Globalization's Impact
Focus on national interests Requires international cooperation
Clear lines of authority Blurred lines of responsibility
Emphasis on control and compliance Needs adaptability and innovation
Limited exposure to diverse perspectives Demands cross-cultural understanding

Conclusion

In conclusion, while hierarchy remains a fundamental element of public administration, its effectiveness in addressing ethical challenges is significantly diminished in a globalized world. The inherent limitations of hierarchical structures – information asymmetry, rigidity, and potential for abuse – are exacerbated by the complexities of transnational issues and the need for international cooperation. A shift towards more networked, collaborative, and transparent governance models, coupled with a strong emphasis on ethical leadership and capacity building, is crucial to navigate the ethical landscape of globalized public administration. Moving beyond a purely top-down approach and embracing multi-stakeholder engagement is essential for fostering a more ethical and effective public service.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Evaluate your handwritten answer in under a minute

Free trial available • Trusted by 1,00,000+ aspirants

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Regulatory Arbitrage
The practice of exploiting differences in regulations between countries to gain a competitive advantage, often by shifting operations to jurisdictions with less stringent rules.
Power Distance
A cultural dimension that describes the extent to which less powerful members of institutions and organizations within a country expect and accept that power is distributed unequally. High power distance cultures may be less likely to challenge authority, potentially hindering ethical reporting.

Key Statistics

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), an estimated $2.1 trillion is laundered globally each year (2009 data, knowledge cutoff). This highlights the scale of transnational financial crime facilitated by globalization.

Source: UNODC

Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index (CPI) consistently shows a correlation between weak governance structures and high levels of corruption. Countries with strong hierarchical systems but weak rule of law often score poorly on the CPI (data varies annually).

Source: Transparency International

Examples

Volkswagen Emissions Scandal

Volkswagen deliberately programmed its diesel engines to activate emission controls only during laboratory testing, circumventing environmental regulations in multiple countries. This exemplifies how companies exploit regulatory loopholes in a globalized market.

Frequently Asked Questions

▶Can hierarchy ever be ethical in public administration?

Yes, hierarchy is not inherently unethical. It provides structure, accountability, and clear lines of responsibility. However, its effectiveness depends on a strong ethical culture, transparency, and effective oversight mechanisms. In a globalized context, it needs to be complemented by collaborative and networked governance approaches.

Topics Covered

Public AdministrationEthicsGlobalizationGovernanceAccountabilityInternational Relations
Back to all PSYCHOLOGY-PAPER-II 2013 questions