UPSC MainsSOCIOLOGY-PAPER-II201310 Marks100 Words
Q13.

Five Year Plans.

How to Approach

The question asks for notes on Five Year Plans. A good answer will trace the evolution of these plans, highlighting their objectives, strategies, successes, and failures across different phases. It should cover the shift from a centralized planning model to a more indicative one, and the eventual dismantling of the Planning Commission. The answer should be structured chronologically, covering each plan briefly, and then analyzing the overall impact. Focus on the socio-economic context of each plan.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Five Year Plans (FYPs) were the central mechanism for economic and social planning in India from 1951 to 2015. Inspired by the Soviet Union’s model of centralized planning, India adopted this approach to accelerate economic development and address poverty. The FYPs aimed to mobilize resources, set national priorities, and guide investment in key sectors. They represented a significant departure from the laissez-faire policies of the British colonial era, embodying a belief in the state’s role in driving economic progress. However, with changing economic realities and the liberalization of the 1990s, the relevance of the FYP model diminished, leading to its eventual replacement by the NITI Aayog in 2015.

First Five Year Plan (1951-1956)

This plan focused on agricultural development, with irrigation projects being a key priority. It was influenced by the Harrod-Domar model, emphasizing capital accumulation. The plan achieved a growth rate of 2.1% and laid the foundation for future development. It was largely successful due to relatively peaceful conditions post-independence and significant external aid (primarily from the US under the Point Four Program).

Second Five Year Plan (1956-1961)

This plan emphasized industrialization, particularly heavy industries like steel and power. It was based on the Mahalanobis model, prioritizing capital goods production. The plan achieved a growth rate of 4.8%, but faced challenges due to increased import costs and the Korean War impacting resource availability.

Third Five Year Plan (1961-1966)

Aimed at achieving self-sufficiency and increasing national income, this plan focused on agriculture and irrigation. However, the Indo-China War of 1962 and the Indo-Pakistan War of 1965 disrupted the plan, leading to its failure to achieve the targeted growth rate. It’s often called the “Gadgil Plan” after the Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission, P.V. Gadgil.

Fourth Five Year Plan (1969-1974)

This plan adopted the ‘Garibi Hatao’ (Eradicate Poverty) slogan and focused on self-reliance, social justice, and agricultural production. Nationalization of banks was a key feature. The plan faced challenges due to the 1971 Indo-Pakistan War and drought conditions, resulting in a lower growth rate than anticipated.

Fifth Five Year Plan (1974-1979)

This plan emphasized self-reliance, reducing poverty, and achieving social justice. It focused on infrastructure development and employment generation. However, political instability and the oil crisis of 1979 hampered its progress.

Sixth Five Year Plan (1980-1985)

This plan focused on increasing food grain production and improving the living standards of the poor. It achieved a higher growth rate of 5.2% due to favorable weather conditions and increased agricultural output. It also emphasized technological advancements.

Seventh Five Year Plan (1985-1990)

This plan aimed at improving the quality of life, increasing employment opportunities, and reducing regional disparities. It focused on food, energy, and water. It achieved a growth rate of 6.0%, but faced challenges due to the balance of payments crisis in 1991.

Eighth Five Year Plan (1992-1997)

This plan was launched in the context of economic liberalization and globalization. It focused on rapid economic growth, modernization of industries, and employment generation. It achieved a growth rate of 6.8%.

Ninth Five Year Plan (1997-2002)

This plan aimed at accelerating economic growth, reducing poverty, and ensuring social justice. It focused on agriculture, infrastructure, and education. It faced challenges due to the Asian financial crisis and natural disasters.

Tenth Five Year Plan (2002-2007)

This plan focused on achieving a growth rate of 8% and reducing poverty by 5 percentage points. It emphasized education, health, and infrastructure development. It achieved a growth rate of 7.7%.

Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012)

This plan aimed at inclusive growth, focusing on reducing poverty, improving education and health, and addressing climate change. It targeted a growth rate of 9% but achieved 8.2% due to the global financial crisis of 2008.

Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017)

This plan focused on faster, sustainable, and more inclusive growth. It aimed to address issues like skill development, infrastructure deficits, and environmental sustainability. However, it was the last Five Year Plan as the Planning Commission was replaced by NITI Aayog.

Plan Focus Growth Rate (%)
First (1951-56) Agriculture 2.1
Second (1956-61) Heavy Industry 4.8
Eleventh (2007-12) Inclusive Growth 8.2

Conclusion

The Five Year Plans played a crucial role in shaping India’s economic trajectory for over six decades. While they were instrumental in building a strong industrial base and promoting agricultural development, their centralized planning approach became increasingly rigid and unresponsive to changing economic realities. The shift towards liberalization in the 1990s and the subsequent establishment of NITI Aayog marked a move towards a more decentralized and market-oriented approach to economic planning. Despite their eventual dismantling, the legacy of the FYPs remains significant in understanding India’s development journey.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Mahalanobis Model
An economic development model developed by Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis, emphasizing capital accumulation and prioritizing heavy industries for rapid economic growth. It was the basis for the Second Five Year Plan.
NITI Aayog
National Institution for Transforming India, a policy think tank established in 2015 to replace the Planning Commission. It aims to foster cooperative federalism and promote innovation and entrepreneurship.

Key Statistics

India’s average GDP growth rate during the FYP period (1951-2012) was approximately 5.6% (Source: Reserve Bank of India, 2014 - knowledge cutoff).

Source: Reserve Bank of India (2014)

The share of agriculture in India’s GDP declined from 51.9% in 1951 to 14.4% in 2022-23, reflecting the shift towards industrialization and the service sector during the FYP era (Source: Economic Survey 2023-24 - knowledge cutoff).

Source: Economic Survey 2023-24

Examples

Bhakra Nangal Dam

Constructed during the First Five Year Plan, the Bhakra Nangal Dam is a prime example of the plan’s focus on irrigation and agricultural development. It significantly increased agricultural productivity in Punjab and Haryana.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were the Five Year Plans abandoned?

The FYPs were abandoned due to their rigid, top-down approach, which became less effective in a rapidly changing globalized economy. The liberalization policies of the 1990s necessitated a more flexible and market-driven planning mechanism, leading to the formation of NITI Aayog.

Topics Covered

EconomyHistoryEconomic PlanningDevelopment ModelsIndian Economy