UPSC MainsANTHROPOLOGY-PAPER-II201415 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q25.

Discuss the rise of ethno-nationalism among Indian tribes with specific example.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of ethno-nationalism and its manifestation within the Indian tribal context. The approach should begin by defining ethno-nationalism and differentiating it from other forms of nationalism. The answer should then explore the historical and socio-political factors contributing to its rise, followed by specific examples like the Naga movement, Jharkhand movement, and the recent developments in Odisha. Finally, it should briefly discuss the challenges and potential solutions associated with this phenomenon, emphasizing the need for inclusive development and recognition of tribal identity. A structured format with clear headings and subheadings is crucial for clarity and comprehensiveness.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Ethno-nationalism, a potent force shaping contemporary geopolitics, is increasingly visible within India’s tribal landscape. It signifies a form of nationalism rooted in shared ethnicity, often intertwined with claims of historical injustice, territorial autonomy, and cultural preservation. Unlike civic nationalism, which emphasizes shared citizenship and values, ethno-nationalism prioritizes ethnic identity and its associated rights. Historically, tribal communities in India, largely marginalized and subjected to colonial exploitation and post-independence assimilation policies, have experienced a resurgence of ethno-nationalist sentiments. Recent developments, including increasing awareness facilitated by technology and perceived threats to their cultural identity, have further fueled this trend, demanding a critical examination of its causes and consequences.

Understanding Ethno-Nationalism and its Context in India

Ethno-nationalism is a complex ideology that combines ethnic identity (shared ancestry, language, culture) with a nationalist agenda. It differs from civic nationalism, which bases national identity on legal and political membership. In the Indian context, ethno-nationalism among tribes arises from a unique confluence of factors: historical marginalization, colonial legacies, state policies of assimilation, and a growing assertion of indigenous rights.

Historical Roots and Contributing Factors

  • Colonial Legacy: Colonial policies often exploited tribal resources and disrupted traditional social structures, leading to resentment and a desire for self-determination. The British policy of ‘Divide and Rule’ exacerbated existing ethnic differences, sometimes exploited for administrative control.
  • Post-Independence Integration Challenges: The integration of princely states, many of which had significant tribal populations, into independent India was often coercive and failed to adequately address tribal concerns.
  • Development Displacement: Large-scale development projects (dams, mines, forests) frequently displaced tribal communities from their ancestral lands without proper compensation or rehabilitation, intensifying feelings of injustice.
  • State Assimilation Policies: Early state policies aimed at assimilating tribal communities into the mainstream often disregarded their unique cultural and social practices, leading to a backlash.
  • Rise of Identity Politics: The rise of identity politics in India, particularly during the 1980s and 1990s, provided a platform for tribal groups to articulate their grievances and demands.
  • Technological Advancements: The internet and social media have facilitated communication and organization among tribal communities, allowing them to share information and mobilize support for their cause.

Case Studies of Ethno-Nationalism Among Indian Tribes

1. The Naga Movement

The Naga movement, spanning decades, exemplifies ethno-nationalism. Driven by a desire for self-determination and cultural preservation, the Naga National Council (NNC) was formed in 1946, demanding a separate Naga nation. The movement has witnessed various phases, including armed insurgency and political negotiations. The Framework Agreement signed in 2015 between the Government of India and the NSCN-IM (National Socialist Council of Nagaland – Immanuel) remains unresolved, highlighting the complexities of addressing Naga aspirations. The demand for a separate "Greater Nagaland" (Nagalim) encompassing Naga-inhabited areas across states continues to be a significant factor. The Naga Peoples Convention (NPC) also played a crucial role.

2. The Jharkhand Movement

The Jharkhand movement, gaining momentum in the 1990s, aimed to create a separate state for tribal people in the Chhotanagpur region. Fueled by concerns over land alienation, resource exploitation, and political marginalization, the movement successfully led to the creation of the state of Jharkhand in 2000. However, despite the creation of the state, many of the issues that fueled the movement – such as illegal mining and displacement – remain unresolved, leading to renewed calls for greater autonomy and self-governance. The Jharkhand Party (BJP) played a significant role in advocating for the state.

3. The Bodo Movement

The Bodo movement in Assam sought recognition of the Bodo identity and greater political representation. This resulted in the creation of Bodoland Territorial Autonomous Districts (BTAD) in 2003. While providing some degree of autonomy, the BTAD has faced challenges in effectively addressing the socio-economic needs of the Bodo people. The United Bodo Peoples Alliance (UBPA) remains a prominent organization advocating for Bodo rights.

4. Recent Developments in Odisha - The Palli Sabhas and Gram Sabha Issues

Recently, there has been increased scrutiny and pushback against the Odisha government’s efforts to transform Gram Sabhas into "Palli Sabhas," alleging a dilution of tribal self-governance and control over forest resources. This reflects a broader concern among tribal communities about the erosion of their traditional institutions and autonomy. The issue has been brought to the forefront by activists and civil society organizations, highlighting the importance of protecting tribal rights and ensuring their participation in decision-making processes.

Challenges and Potential Solutions

  • Fragmentation: Ethno-nationalist movements can be fragmented, making it difficult to negotiate a unified position.
  • Extremism: The use of violence and extremism can undermine the legitimacy of ethno-nationalist claims.
  • Exclusion: Focusing solely on ethnic identity can lead to the exclusion of non-ethnic groups within the community.
  • Need for Inclusive Development: Addressing the underlying socio-economic grievances of tribal communities through inclusive development policies is crucial.
  • Recognition of Tribal Identity: Recognizing and protecting the unique cultural and linguistic identity of tribal communities is essential.
  • Strengthening Panchayati Raj Institutions: Empowering Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI) and ensuring their effective functioning can enhance local governance. The PESA Act (1996) aims to strengthen traditional gram sabhas.
The rise of ethno-nationalism among Indian tribes is a complex phenomenon rooted in historical marginalization, developmental displacement, and a desire for self-determination. While demands for autonomy and cultural preservation are legitimate, it is crucial to address the underlying grievances through inclusive development, recognition of tribal identity, and genuine participation in decision-making processes. Balancing the need for national integration with the right to self-determination remains a significant challenge for the Indian state, requiring a sensitive and nuanced approach that respects the diversity and dignity of all communities. Failure to do so risks further alienation and instability.

Conclusion

The rise of ethno-nationalism among Indian tribes is a complex phenomenon rooted in historical marginalization, developmental displacement, and a desire for self-determination. While demands for autonomy and cultural preservation are legitimate, it is crucial to address the underlying grievances through inclusive development, recognition of tribal identity, and genuine participation in decision-making processes. Balancing the need for national integration with the right to self-determination remains a significant challenge for the Indian state, requiring a sensitive and nuanced approach that respects the diversity and dignity of all communities. Failure to do so risks further alienation and instability.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Ethno-Nationalism
A form of nationalism based on shared ethnicity, often involving claims of historical injustice, territorial autonomy, and cultural preservation.
Civic Nationalism
A form of nationalism that emphasizes shared citizenship, values, and legal/political membership, rather than ethnicity.

Key Statistics

According to the 2011 Census, Scheduled Tribes constitute approximately 8.6% of India’s population, totaling over 104 million people.

Source: Census of India, 2011

The Forest Rights Act (FRA), 2006, aims to recognize the rights of traditional forest dwellers, but its implementation has been uneven, leading to ongoing conflicts.

Source: Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India

Examples

Naga Movement - Framework Agreement

The 2015 Framework Agreement between the Government of India and NSCN-IM, while aiming to resolve the Naga insurgency, remains unresolved due to disagreements on the scope of autonomy and territorial boundaries.

Jharkhand Movement - Creation of Jharkhand State

The Jharkhand movement successfully led to the creation of the state of Jharkhand in 2000, highlighting the potential for achieving political goals through organized activism. However, the issues that drove the movement persist.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between ethno-nationalism and secessionism?

While ethno-nationalism can sometimes lead to secessionist demands, it is not inherently secessionist. Ethno-nationalism focuses on protecting and promoting ethnic identity and rights, which may or may not involve a desire to break away from a larger nation-state.

How does the Indian Constitution address the concerns of tribal communities?

The Indian Constitution provides special provisions for Scheduled Tribes, including reservations in education and employment, representation in legislatures, and protection of their cultural and traditional rights. Articles 244 and 245 deal with administration of tribal areas.

Topics Covered

SociologyIndian SocietyPoliticsIdentity PoliticsSocial MovementsRegionalism