UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-I201420 Marks
Q20.

“With the Doha Round of multilateral trade talks stalled, regional trade agreements (RTAs) have emerged as an alternative approach to increase trade, spur stronger economic growth and lower unemployment rates in the participating countries.” Explain.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the global trade landscape, the reasons for the Doha Round’s failure, and the rise of RTAs. The answer should begin by defining RTAs and the Doha Round, then explain why the latter stalled. Subsequently, it should detail how RTAs offer alternatives for trade growth, economic development, and employment. Illustrative examples of successful RTAs and their impact are crucial. The structure will be: Introduction, Doha Round failure, RTA benefits, criticisms, and conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Globalization has spurred international trade, with the multilateral trading system under the World Trade Organization (WTO) intended to facilitate this. The Doha Development Round, launched in 2001, aimed to lower trade barriers worldwide, particularly for developing countries. However, disagreements among member nations, especially concerning agricultural subsidies and market access, led to its prolonged stalemate. Consequently, Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs) – preferential trade arrangements between three or more countries – have gained prominence as alternative pathways to achieve trade liberalization, economic growth, and employment generation. This essay will explore the reasons for the Doha Round’s failure and analyze how RTAs have emerged as a viable alternative.

The Stalemate of the Doha Round

The Doha Round was envisioned as a ‘Development Round’, prioritizing the needs of developing countries. However, several factors contributed to its failure:

  • Agricultural Subsidies: Developed countries, particularly the US and EU, were unwilling to significantly reduce their agricultural subsidies, which distort global markets and disadvantage developing country farmers.
  • Market Access: Disagreements over reducing tariffs and non-tariff barriers to market access, especially in sensitive sectors like textiles and agriculture, proved insurmountable.
  • Special and Differential Treatment (SDT): Developing countries sought greater flexibility in implementing WTO agreements, but developed countries were hesitant to grant substantial concessions.
  • Rise of Bilateralism: The increasing preference for bilateral trade agreements by major economies diminished the political will to compromise in multilateral negotiations.

By 2015, it became clear that the Doha Round was effectively stalled, leading to a shift towards RTAs.

The Rise of Regional Trade Agreements (RTAs)

RTAs offer a more focused and manageable approach to trade liberalization compared to the complex multilateral negotiations of the WTO. They can be broadly categorized into:

  • Free Trade Areas (FTAs): Eliminate tariffs among member countries but maintain independent trade policies with non-members (e.g., NAFTA/USMCA).
  • Customs Unions: Eliminate tariffs among members and adopt a common external tariff (CET) towards non-members (e.g., Southern Common Market - MERCOSUR).
  • Common Markets: Include the features of a customs union and allow for the free movement of factors of production (labor and capital) (e.g., European Economic Area - EEA).
  • Economic Unions: Represent the highest level of integration, involving a common currency and harmonized economic policies (e.g., Eurozone).

Benefits of RTAs

  • Increased Trade: RTAs create larger markets, leading to increased trade flows among member countries. For example, ASEAN has seen significant intra-regional trade growth since the establishment of the ASEAN Free Trade Area (AFTA) in 1992.
  • Economic Growth: Reduced trade barriers stimulate investment, productivity, and economic growth. The Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) between India and South Korea (2009) has boosted bilateral trade and investment.
  • Employment Generation: Increased trade and investment create employment opportunities in export-oriented industries.
  • Faster Negotiations: RTAs involve fewer countries, making negotiations quicker and more efficient than multilateral talks.
  • Deeper Integration: RTAs can go beyond tariff reductions to address issues like intellectual property rights, investment protection, and regulatory harmonization.

Criticisms and Challenges of RTAs

Despite their benefits, RTAs also face criticisms:

  • Trade Diversion: RTAs can divert trade from more efficient non-member countries to less efficient member countries due to preferential tariff treatment.
  • Spaghetti Bowl Effect: A proliferation of overlapping RTAs can create a complex and fragmented trade landscape, increasing transaction costs for businesses.
  • Exclusion of Developing Countries: Some RTAs may exclude developing countries, hindering their access to global markets.
  • Potential for Protectionism: RTAs can be used as a form of protectionism, shielding member countries from competition from non-members.

Recent Trends and India’s Position

Currently, there is a surge in mega-regional trade agreements like the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). India initially opted out of RCEP in 2020 due to concerns about trade imbalances and market access issues, but is re-evaluating its position. India is actively pursuing bilateral trade agreements and FTAs with various countries to enhance its trade competitiveness.

Conclusion

The stalled Doha Round undeniably paved the way for the proliferation of RTAs as a pragmatic alternative for fostering trade liberalization and economic growth. While RTAs offer numerous benefits, including increased trade, economic growth, and employment, they also present challenges like trade diversion and the potential for fragmentation. A balanced approach, combining efforts to revive the multilateral trading system with strategic participation in well-designed RTAs, is crucial for maximizing the benefits of global trade and ensuring inclusive economic development. India’s engagement in RTAs should be guided by a careful assessment of its national interests and a commitment to promoting a fair and equitable global trading system.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Most Favored Nation (MFN)
A principle of non-discrimination in international trade, requiring a country to extend the same trade concessions to all WTO members.
Trade Diversion
The shift in trade from a more efficient producer to a less efficient producer within a preferential trade agreement due to tariff preferences.

Key Statistics

According to the WTO, as of October 2023, there were over 300 RTAs in force worldwide.

Source: World Trade Organization (WTO), October 2023

In 2022, intra-ASEAN trade accounted for approximately 23.1% of ASEAN’s total trade.

Source: ASEAN Secretariat, 2023 (Knowledge cutoff)

Examples

European Union (EU)

The EU is a prime example of a successful economic union, demonstrating deep integration through a common market, customs union, and monetary union (Eurozone).

Frequently Asked Questions

Are RTAs compatible with WTO rules?

Yes, RTAs are permitted under Article XXIV of the GATT and Article V of the GATS, but they must meet certain conditions, such as covering substantially all trade and not raising barriers to trade with non-members.