UPSC MainsECONOMICS-PAPER-I201410 Marks
Q8.

What do you understand by shifting of a tax? How does a monopolist succeed in shifting the burden of a tax under increasing marginal cost?

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of incidence theory and market structures. The answer should begin by defining tax incidence and tax shifting. Then, it should explain how a monopolist, unlike firms in competitive markets, can successfully shift the burden of a tax to consumers even with increasing marginal costs. The explanation should focus on the monopolist’s ability to control output and price, and how this allows them to maintain profit maximization post-tax. A diagrammatic representation would be beneficial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Tax incidence refers to the actual distribution of the burden of a tax, regardless of who is legally responsible for paying it. Tax shifting is the ability of a firm to transfer the burden of a tax to another economic agent, typically consumers. While in perfectly competitive markets, the ability to shift taxes is limited, monopolists possess significant market power that allows them to influence prices and quantities, thereby influencing who ultimately bears the cost of the tax. This is particularly relevant when considering firms with increasing marginal costs, where the impact of a tax can be more complex.

Understanding Tax Incidence and Shifting

Generally, the burden of a tax falls on the entity with less elastic demand or supply. In competitive markets, both buyers and sellers share the tax burden. However, a monopolist, being the sole seller, faces the entire market demand curve. This gives them considerable control over the quantity supplied and, consequently, the price.

Tax Shifting by a Monopolist with Increasing Marginal Cost

A monopolist, even with increasing marginal cost, can successfully shift the burden of a tax because of their ability to restrict output and raise prices. Here’s how:

  • Initial Equilibrium: Before the tax, the monopolist maximizes profit by producing where Marginal Revenue (MR) equals Marginal Cost (MC). This determines the profit-maximizing quantity (Q0) and price (P0).
  • Impact of Tax: The imposition of a per-unit tax shifts the MC curve upwards by the amount of the tax.
  • New Equilibrium: The monopolist responds to the increased MC by reducing output (to Q1) and increasing price (to P1). Crucially, the price increase is typically *greater* than the amount of the tax.
  • Burden Shifting: The increase in price represents the portion of the tax burden shifted to consumers. The reduction in quantity represents the portion borne by the monopolist (as reduced sales lead to lower total revenue).

Why Increasing Marginal Cost Doesn’t Prevent Shifting

Even with increasing marginal cost, the monopolist can shift the tax because the demand curve is downward sloping. The monopolist’s objective is to maximize profit, not minimize cost. The tax increases costs, but the monopolist can partially offset this by raising prices. Because demand is not perfectly elastic, consumers will continue to purchase the product at the higher price, albeit in smaller quantities. The monopolist’s ability to control output is key.

Diagrammatic Representation (Conceptual)

Imagine a standard monopolist’s diagram with MC, MR, and Demand curves. The imposition of a tax shifts the MC curve upwards. The new intersection of MR and the shifted MC determines the new quantity and price. The vertical distance between the original and new price represents the tax passed on to consumers, while the horizontal distance represents the reduction in quantity, indicating the monopolist’s share of the burden.

Factors Influencing the Degree of Tax Shifting

  • Elasticity of Demand: The more inelastic the demand, the greater the proportion of the tax that can be shifted to consumers.
  • Magnitude of the Tax: A larger tax may be more difficult to shift entirely, as it could lead to a significant reduction in quantity demanded.
  • Market Conditions: The presence of potential competitors or substitutes can limit the monopolist’s ability to raise prices.

Comparison with Competitive Markets

In a perfectly competitive market, firms are price takers. They cannot raise prices to offset the cost of a tax without losing all their customers. Therefore, the burden of the tax falls primarily on the suppliers. A monopolist, however, has the power to influence price and can therefore shift a significant portion of the tax burden to consumers.

Feature Perfect Competition Monopoly
Price Control None (Price Taker) Significant (Price Maker)
Tax Shifting Limited Substantial
Burden of Tax Primarily Suppliers Shared between Consumers & Firm

Conclusion

In conclusion, a monopolist’s ability to shift the burden of a tax, even under increasing marginal cost, stems from their market power and control over output. Unlike firms in competitive markets, they can raise prices to offset the increased cost, passing a significant portion of the tax onto consumers. The degree of shifting depends on the elasticity of demand and the magnitude of the tax. Understanding this dynamic is crucial for effective tax policy design and analysis, particularly in industries dominated by a single firm.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Tax Incidence
The actual distribution of the burden of a tax, determined by the relative elasticities of supply and demand.
Marginal Cost
The change in total cost that arises when the quantity produced is incremented by one unit; that is, it is the cost of producing one more unit of a good.

Key Statistics

According to a 2023 report by the OECD, corporate tax revenues as a percentage of GDP have been declining in many developed countries, partly due to tax avoidance strategies employed by multinational corporations.

Source: OECD (2023)

The pharmaceutical industry had global sales of approximately $1.48 trillion in 2022, demonstrating its significant market power. (Source: Statista, as of knowledge cutoff)

Source: Statista (2022)

Examples

Pharmaceutical Industry

Pharmaceutical companies with patent protection (effectively a monopoly) often raise prices significantly when faced with new taxes or regulations, shifting the burden onto consumers and healthcare systems.

Frequently Asked Questions

What happens if demand is perfectly elastic?

If demand is perfectly elastic, the monopolist cannot raise prices at all without losing all customers. In this case, the monopolist would have to bear the entire burden of the tax.