UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-II201412 Marks200 Words
Q4.

What do you understand by the concept "freedom of speech and expression"? Does it cover hate speech also ? Why do the films in India stand on a slightly different plane from other forms of expression ? Discuss.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of fundamental rights, particularly Article 19(1)(a) concerning freedom of speech and expression. The answer should define the concept, analyze its limitations concerning hate speech, and explain why films are treated differently in India due to potential for wider and more immediate impact. A structured approach – defining the concept, discussing hate speech, and then focusing on films – will be effective. Referencing relevant constitutional articles, landmark judgments, and film censorship laws is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Freedom of speech and expression is a cornerstone of any democratic society, enshrined as a fundamental right in Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. This right allows individuals to articulate their thoughts, opinions, and beliefs without fear of censorship. However, this freedom is not absolute and is subject to reasonable restrictions as outlined in Article 19(2), encompassing concerns like national security, public order, and defamation. The question of whether this freedom extends to hate speech, and the unique regulatory framework applied to films in India, are complex issues demanding careful consideration.

Understanding Freedom of Speech and Expression

Freedom of speech and expression, as guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a), encompasses a wide range of rights, including the right to hold opinions, to receive and impart information and ideas, and to express oneself through various mediums like speech, writing, printing, pictures, and any other form of communication. This right is vital for a functioning democracy, enabling informed public discourse and holding the government accountable.

Hate Speech and its Limitations

The question of whether hate speech falls under the ambit of protected expression is contentious. While freedom of speech is paramount, it cannot be used to incite violence, hatred, or discrimination against any group. Indian law doesn’t explicitly define ‘hate speech’ but relies on interpretations through judicial pronouncements.

  • Section 153A & 153B of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) criminalize promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, caste, or language.
  • The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021, aim to regulate online content and address harmful speech.
  • The Supreme Court in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) emphasized that freedom of speech is not absolute and can be restricted in the interest of public order.

The line between protected speech and hate speech is often blurred, requiring a balancing act between individual rights and societal harmony. The ‘imminent lawless action’ doctrine, derived from the US case of Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), is sometimes invoked, requiring a direct link between speech and an immediate threat of violence.

Films: A Distinctive Plane of Expression

Films in India are subject to a more stringent regulatory framework than other forms of expression due to their potential for a wider reach and more immediate impact on public opinion. This is rooted in the belief that visual media has a powerful influence, particularly on vulnerable sections of society.

  • The Cinematograph Act, 1952 regulates the production and exhibition of films in India.
  • The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), often referred to as the censor board, is responsible for granting certificates to films, classifying them as ‘U’ (unrestricted public exhibition), ‘A’ (adults only), or ‘U/A’ (unrestricted public exhibition with parental guidance).
  • The CBFC can order cuts or modifications to films if they are deemed to violate guidelines related to obscenity, violence, national security, or public morality.

This pre-screening process distinguishes films from other forms of expression like books or journalism, which are generally subject to post-publication scrutiny. Landmark cases like S. Rangarajan v. P. Jagjivan Ram (1989) affirmed the need for a ‘balancing act’ between freedom of expression and societal concerns, but also cautioned against excessive censorship. The recent debates surrounding films like ‘Padmaavat’ and ‘Jodha Akbar’ highlight the ongoing tension between artistic freedom and societal sensitivities.

Form of Expression Regulatory Framework Level of Scrutiny
Films Cinematograph Act, 1952; CBFC Pre-screening censorship
Books/Journalism IPC (Defamation, Sedition); IT Rules, 2021 Post-publication scrutiny
Online Content IT Rules, 2021 Reactive regulation (after complaint)

Conclusion

Freedom of speech and expression is a fundamental right, but it is not without limitations. While hate speech is not protected under this right, defining its boundaries remains a challenge. Films, due to their potent influence, are subjected to a more rigorous regulatory framework in India, reflecting a societal concern for maintaining public order and morality. Striking a balance between protecting freedom of expression and safeguarding societal values is crucial for a vibrant and democratic society. The evolving digital landscape necessitates a continuous re-evaluation of these principles and regulations.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Article 19(1)(a)
Guarantees freedom of speech and expression to all citizens of India.
Hate Speech
Expression that attacks or demeans a group based on attributes such as race, religion, ethnic origin, national origin, sex, disability, sexual orientation, or gender identity.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, India ranked 161 out of 180 countries in the World Press Freedom Index published by Reporters Without Borders.

Source: Reporters Without Borders (2023)

According to a 2022 report by the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), cases registered under Section 153A (promoting enmity between groups) increased by 68.7% in 2021 compared to 2020.

Source: National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), 2022

Examples

Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015)

The Supreme Court struck down Section 66A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which criminalized sending offensive messages online, holding it to be unconstitutional as it violated freedom of speech.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can the government completely ban a book or film?

Complete bans are generally disfavored by the courts and are subject to strict scrutiny. The government must demonstrate a compelling state interest and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

Topics Covered

PolitySocial IssuesFundamental RightsFreedom of SpeechCensorshipHate Speech