Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The pursuit of public service, particularly through the Civil Services, is often envisioned as a path to societal betterment. However, the reality can be fraught with ethical challenges. The question posed reflects a common dilemma faced by aspirants – the tension between adhering to ethical principles and navigating a potentially corrupt or compromising environment. The assertion that ‘individual attempts to stick to ethical principles may cause problems’ taps into a legitimate fear, particularly in contexts where systemic corruption is prevalent. This necessitates a careful examination of why ethical conduct remains paramount, even in the face of adversity, and how to reconcile pragmatic concerns with unwavering integrity.
Understanding the Dilemma
The friend’s argument stems from a realistic assessment of the existing environment. Unethical practices, often deeply ingrained in systems, can create obstacles for those who choose to remain honest. This can manifest as delayed approvals, unfair treatment, or even threats to personal safety and family well-being. The ‘path of least resistance’ – compromising one’s ethics – may seem appealing in the short term, offering career advancement and avoiding immediate hardship. However, this approach overlooks the fundamental principles of public service.
Why Ethical Conduct is Non-Negotiable
Several compelling reasons justify prioritizing ethical conduct, even at personal cost:
- Public Trust: Civil servants are custodians of public trust. Any deviation from ethical standards erodes this trust, undermining the legitimacy of the government and its institutions.
- Long-Term Consequences: While short-term gains might be achieved through unethical means, the long-term consequences – systemic corruption, inefficiency, and societal harm – far outweigh any immediate benefits.
- Rule of Law: Upholding ethical principles is crucial for strengthening the rule of law. Compromising ethics weakens the legal framework and encourages impunity.
- Professional Integrity: Ethical conduct is integral to professional integrity. A civil servant’s reputation for honesty and fairness is their most valuable asset.
- Moral Duty: Beyond legal and professional obligations, there exists a moral duty to act ethically and contribute to a just and equitable society.
Mitigating the Challenges
Acknowledging the difficulties faced by ethical individuals doesn’t negate the importance of upholding principles. Instead, it necessitates proactive strategies to mitigate the challenges:
- Building a Support Network: Connecting with like-minded colleagues and mentors can provide emotional support and guidance.
- Documenting Everything: Maintaining meticulous records of all decisions and actions can provide evidence in case of false accusations or attempts to compromise integrity.
- Utilizing Grievance Mechanisms: Leveraging existing grievance redressal mechanisms, such as the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and departmental inquiries, to report unethical practices.
- Promoting Transparency: Advocating for greater transparency in government processes can reduce opportunities for corruption.
- Seeking Transfer: In extreme cases, seeking a transfer to a different department or location might be necessary to escape a hostile environment.
The ‘Good We Can’ Argument
The suggestion to “be happy with doing whatever good we can” is a dangerous rationalization. It normalizes unethical behavior and creates a slippery slope. While acknowledging that achieving perfection is unrealistic, deliberately compromising one’s ethics is not a viable solution. Instead, focusing on maximizing ethical impact within the existing constraints is crucial. This involves consistently striving to do the right thing, even in small ways, and challenging unethical practices whenever possible. The 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (2008) emphasized the need for a strong ethical framework and accountability mechanisms in public service.
Balancing Pragmatism and Ethics
The key lies in finding a balance between pragmatism and ethics. Pragmatism shouldn’t be an excuse for compromising principles, but rather a recognition of the complexities of the real world. It requires strategic thinking, careful planning, and a willingness to navigate difficult situations with integrity. The Nolan Committee (UK, 1994) identified seven principles of public life – Selflessness, Integrity, Objectivity, Accountability, Openness, Honesty, and Leadership – which provide a useful framework for ethical decision-making.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision to uphold ethical principles in public service is a personal one. While the path may be challenging, the rewards – a clear conscience, public trust, and a positive contribution to society – are immeasurable. Succumbing to the ‘path of least resistance’ may offer short-term gains, but it ultimately undermines the very foundations of good governance. Civil servants must remember that their actions have far-reaching consequences and that integrity is not merely a desirable trait, but a fundamental requirement for effective and responsible public service.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.