UPSC MainsLAW-PAPER-II201420 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q9.

Criminal breach of trust and cheating are two distinct offences generally involving dishonest intention but mutually exclusive and different in basic concept." Explain with the help of decided cases.

How to Approach

This question requires a detailed understanding of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) provisions related to criminal breach of trust (Section 405) and cheating (Section 420). The answer should begin by defining both offences, highlighting their essential elements. A comparative analysis, emphasizing the differences in *mens rea* (mental element) and the nature of the property involved, is crucial. Support the explanation with relevant case laws to demonstrate the practical application of these legal concepts. Structure the answer by first defining the offences, then comparing them, and finally illustrating with case laws.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Indian Penal Code, 1860, addresses a wide range of offences against property and persons. Among these, criminal breach of trust and cheating are frequently encountered, often appearing similar due to the involvement of dishonest intention. However, they are distinct offences with different legal implications. Criminal breach of trust, defined under Section 405 of the IPC, concerns the dishonest misappropriation of property entrusted to a person. Cheating, as defined under Section 420, involves deceiving someone to deliver property or to do or omit to do something, causing harm. This answer will delineate the differences between these two offences, supported by relevant judicial pronouncements, demonstrating that while both involve dishonesty, they are mutually exclusive in their basic concept.

Criminal Breach of Trust (Section 405, IPC)

Criminal breach of trust occurs when a person entrusted with property dishonestly misappropriates it, or converts it to his own use, or wilfully authorizes another person to do so. The key elements are:

  • Entrustment: Property must be entrusted to the accused in a manner that creates a legal obligation to deal with it honestly.
  • Dishonest Misappropriation: This involves dealing with the property in a way that is not authorized and is intended to cause wrongful gain to oneself or another, or wrongful loss to the owner.
  • Intention: The accused must have a dishonest intention at the time of misappropriation.

Cheating (Section 420, IPC)

Cheating involves deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly inducing them to deliver any property, or to make, alter, or destroy valuable security, or to do anything which he would not do if he were not deceived. The essential elements are:

  • Deception: The accused must have deceived the victim.
  • Dishonest Inducement: The deception must have been used to induce the victim to do something they wouldn't have otherwise done.
  • Fraudulent Intention: The accused must have had a fraudulent intention at the time of the deception.
  • Causation: The deception must have caused the victim to suffer a loss.

Comparative Analysis: Criminal Breach of Trust vs. Cheating

While both offences require dishonest intention, the fundamental difference lies in the mode of commission and the nature of the property involved. Criminal breach of trust requires prior possession of property lawfully entrusted, while cheating involves inducing a person to part with property through deception.

Feature Criminal Breach of Trust Cheating
Initial Possession Accused has lawful possession due to entrustment. Accused does not have initial possession; induces transfer.
Mode of Commission Dishonest misappropriation of entrusted property. Deception leading to delivery of property or a wrongful act.
Key Element Misappropriation Deception
Section of IPC Section 405 Section 420

Illustrative Case Laws

  • State of Maharashtra v. Shankarlal Johri (1966 AIR 1189, 1966 SCR (2) 289): This case clarified that for criminal breach of trust, the accused must be in a fiduciary relationship with the victim, having lawful possession of the property.
  • N.B.H. Bank Ltd. v. P.C. Jain (1998) 2 SCC 412: The Supreme Court held that a dishonest intention is crucial for both offences, but the manner in which that intention is manifested differs. In cheating, it's through deception; in criminal breach of trust, it's through misappropriation.
  • R.S. Tyagi v. State of U.P. (2007) 5 SCC 159: This case emphasized that the deception in cheating must be such that it induces the victim to act to their detriment.

Furthermore, a single act can sometimes constitute both offences. However, a conviction for both offences arising from the same act is generally avoided due to the principle of double jeopardy. Courts will typically charge the accused with the more serious offence.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while criminal breach of trust and cheating both involve dishonest intention, they are fundamentally different offences. Criminal breach of trust centers around the misappropriation of entrusted property, while cheating involves deception to induce a transfer of property or a wrongful act. The distinction lies in the initial possession and the mode of commission. Understanding these differences, as clarified by various judicial pronouncements, is crucial for accurate legal application and ensuring justice. The evolving nature of financial crimes necessitates a continued refinement of these legal interpretations to address new forms of deceit and misappropriation.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Mens Rea
Latin for "guilty mind," refers to the mental state of the accused at the time of committing the crime. It is a crucial element in establishing criminal liability.
Fiduciary Relationship
A relationship where one person (the fiduciary) is legally obligated to act in the best interests of another (the beneficiary). This relationship is essential for establishing criminal breach of trust.

Key Statistics

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), there were 1,40,643 cases registered under Section 420 (Cheating) and 22,899 cases under Section 405 (Criminal Breach of Trust) in India.

Source: NCRB, Crime in India Report 2022

The number of cybercrime cases, many involving cheating through phishing and online fraud, has increased by 65% between 2018 and 2022 in India.

Source: Indian Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In) data (as of knowledge cutoff)

Examples

Bank Fraud

A bank manager, entrusted with customer deposits, illegally sanctions loans to fictitious companies and misappropriates the funds. This constitutes criminal breach of trust.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a person be convicted of both criminal breach of trust and cheating for the same act?

Generally, no. While a single act might technically fulfill the elements of both offences, courts usually prefer to charge the accused with the more serious offence to avoid double jeopardy. The principle of Section 300 of the IPC is often applied.

Topics Covered

LawPolityGovernanceIPCCriminal LawProperty Offences