Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a 17th-century German polymath, proposed the theory of pre-established harmony as a solution to the mind-body problem and to explain the apparent order in the universe without invoking divine intervention. This theory posits that each individual substance, or ‘monad,’ operates according to its own internal principle, yet all monads are perfectly synchronized by God from the beginning of time, like perfectly wound clocks. The central question is whether this meticulously coordinated system necessarily implies a complete lack of free will and a universe governed entirely by deterministic laws. This essay will explore the relationship between Leibniz’s pre-established harmony and determinism, examining arguments for and against its deterministic implications.
Understanding Pre-established Harmony
Leibniz’s metaphysics centers around the concept of the ‘monad’ – a simple, indivisible, and immaterial substance that is the fundamental unit of reality. Monads have no ‘windows’ through which anything can enter or leave; they are self-contained and derive all their changes from an internal principle. The universe, therefore, consists of an infinite number of these monads, each reflecting the entire universe from its unique perspective. Crucially, Leibniz argued that God, in creating these monads, pre-ordained a perfect harmony between them, ensuring that their actions are coordinated without any causal interaction. This coordination isn’t a result of ongoing divine intervention, but a consequence of the initial creation.
Deterministic Implications
The theory of pre-established harmony appears to strongly support determinism. If every monad’s actions are determined by its internal principle and perfectly synchronized with all other monads from the outset, then there seems to be no room for genuine contingency or free will. Each ‘choice’ or action is merely the unfolding of a pre-programmed sequence. Consider a complex machine: each gear turns according to its design, and the overall operation is predetermined. Similarly, in Leibniz’s system, each monad ‘acts’ according to its nature, and the resulting harmony is inevitable. This view aligns with a strict causal determinism, where every event is necessitated by prior events.
Counterarguments and Leibniz’s Response
However, Leibniz vehemently denied that his theory implied fatalism or the denial of freedom. He distinguished between ‘determination’ and ‘necessitation.’ He argued that while every monad’s actions are determined by its nature, this determination doesn’t necessitate those actions in the sense of external compulsion. A monad acts freely in the sense that it acts according to its own internal laws, without being influenced by external forces.
Furthermore, Leibniz introduced the concept of ‘sufficient reason.’ For every fact, there must be a sufficient reason why it is so and not otherwise. This doesn’t mean that the reason is causally prior, but that it is logically sufficient to explain the fact. This allows for a rational explanation of the universe without resorting to chance or indeterminacy. He also argued that our perception of freedom arises from our limited perspective; we are unaware of the pre-established harmony and therefore experience our actions as free.
The Problem of Evil and Harmony
A significant challenge to the theory is the existence of evil. If the universe is perfectly harmonious, why does suffering exist? Leibniz addressed this with his ‘best of all possible worlds’ argument, claiming that God, being perfectly rational, chose to create the world that maximizes goodness, even if it contains some evil. This argument, however, remains controversial and is often criticized for its theodical implications.
| Aspect | Deterministic View | Leibniz’s View |
|---|---|---|
| Causation | Events are caused by prior events. | Events are determined by internal principles, not external causes. |
| Freedom | Incompatible with determinism. | Compatible with determination; freedom is acting according to one’s nature. |
| Harmony | A result of causal chains. | Pre-established by God at creation. |
Conclusion
While Leibniz’s theory of pre-established harmony undeniably possesses deterministic elements – the pre-ordained coordination of monads suggests a lack of genuine contingency – it is not necessarily equivalent to strict determinism. Leibniz’s careful distinction between determination and necessitation, coupled with his concept of sufficient reason, attempts to reconcile harmony with a form of internal freedom. However, the inherent difficulty in explaining the existence of evil within a perfectly harmonious system remains a significant challenge. Ultimately, whether Leibniz successfully avoids determinism remains a subject of ongoing philosophical debate.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.