UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-II201415 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q28.

Discuss the conflicting nature of religious experiences with special reference to Buddhism and Jainism.

How to Approach

This question requires a comparative analysis of Buddhist and Jain religious experiences, focusing on their inherent contradictions. The answer should begin by defining 'religious experience' and then delve into the core tenets of both religions, highlighting areas of conflict – particularly regarding concepts like self, liberation, asceticism, and the role of deities. A structured approach comparing and contrasting these aspects will be most effective. The answer should demonstrate an understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of both traditions.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Religious experience, broadly defined, encompasses the subjective and objective encounters individuals have with the sacred or transcendent. These experiences can range from mystical visions and feelings of unity to ethical insights and transformative encounters. While often perceived as unifying, religious experiences can also be inherently conflicting, particularly when comparing different traditions. Buddhism and Jainism, both originating in ancient India as reformist movements challenging Vedic orthodoxy, offer a compelling case study for examining such conflicts. Both emphasize liberation (moksha/nirvana) from the cycle of birth and death (samsara), yet their paths and underlying metaphysical assumptions diverge significantly, leading to conflicting interpretations of religious experience.

Core Philosophical Differences & Conflicting Experiences

The fundamental conflict arises from differing views on the nature of reality and the self. Buddhism, particularly in its early forms, emphasizes Anatta (non-self), asserting that there is no permanent, unchanging essence within individuals. Religious experience in Buddhism, therefore, often involves realizing this emptiness and detaching from the illusion of a self. This leads to a focus on impermanence (Anicca) and suffering (Dukkha), with liberation achieved through extinguishing desire and attachment.

Jainism, conversely, posits a belief in the eternal and individual soul (Jiva). Each Jiva is inherently pure but becomes entangled in the cycle of rebirth due to Karma. Religious experience in Jainism centers around purifying the Jiva by shedding accumulated karma through rigorous asceticism and non-violence (Ahimsa). This creates a fundamental conflict: Buddhism seeks to dismantle the illusion of self, while Jainism aims to liberate the true self.

Asceticism and the Body

Both traditions value asceticism, but the rationale and extent differ. In Buddhism, ascetic practices, while initially emphasized by the Buddha, were later tempered. The Middle Way advocates avoiding extremes of self-indulgence and self-mortification. The goal is to cultivate mindfulness and wisdom, not to punish the body. Buddhist meditative experiences often involve cultivating equanimity towards bodily sensations.

Jain asceticism, however, is far more extreme. Digambara Jains practice complete nudity, believing clothing adds to karmic burden. Fasting, prolonged meditation in difficult postures, and self-imposed restrictions are common. The Jain emphasis on Ahimsa extends to all living beings, including microscopic organisms, leading to meticulous practices to avoid harming any life form. This intense focus on bodily control and purification represents a contrasting religious experience to the Buddhist emphasis on mental cultivation.

The Role of Deities and Rituals

Early Buddhism largely rejected the Vedic pantheon and elaborate rituals. While later Buddhist traditions incorporated local deities and devotional practices, the core emphasis remained on self-reliance and the individual's path to enlightenment. Religious experiences in Buddhism are primarily internal, focused on meditation and insight.

Jainism, while also rejecting Vedic sacrifices, developed its own pantheon of Tirthankaras (spiritual teachers) who serve as role models for liberation. Jains venerate these Tirthankaras and engage in elaborate temple rituals, including offering prayers and performing pujas. These devotional practices provide a different avenue for religious experience, centered on reverence and seeking blessings.

Liberation (Nirvana vs. Moksha)

The ultimate goal – liberation – is conceived differently. Buddhist Nirvana is often described as the cessation of suffering and the extinguishing of the fires of desire, aversion, and ignorance. It’s a state beyond conceptualization, often described as emptiness. The experience of Nirvana is a complete transcendence of the conditioned world.

Jain Moksha, on the other hand, involves the liberation of the Jiva from the cycle of rebirth and its ascent to the highest realm (Siddhashila). The liberated Jiva retains its individuality but is free from karmic bondage. This represents a fundamentally different understanding of liberation – one that preserves the self rather than dissolving it.

Table Summarizing Key Conflicts

Feature Buddhism Jainism
Concept of Self Anatta (Non-Self) Eternal Jiva (Soul)
Asceticism Middle Way; Moderate practices Extreme; Nudity, fasting, rigorous self-control
Role of Deities Initially rejected; Later incorporated locally Veneration of Tirthankaras
Liberation Nirvana – Cessation of suffering, emptiness Moksha – Liberation of Jiva, ascent to Siddhashila

Conclusion

In conclusion, while both Buddhism and Jainism arose from a shared socio-religious milieu and aimed at liberation from suffering, their divergent philosophical foundations led to fundamentally conflicting understandings of religious experience. Buddhism emphasizes the impermanence of all phenomena and the illusion of self, while Jainism affirms the eternal nature of the soul and the importance of purifying it through rigorous asceticism. These differences highlight the diverse ways in which individuals can seek and experience the sacred, demonstrating that the path to liberation is not monolithic but rather shaped by distinct metaphysical and ethical commitments.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Anatta
The Buddhist doctrine of "non-self," asserting that there is no permanent, unchanging essence or soul within individuals.
Karma
In both Jainism and Buddhism, Karma refers to the principle of cause and effect, where actions create consequences that shape future experiences. However, the understanding of how Karma operates differs between the two traditions.

Key Statistics

As of 2020, Buddhism has approximately 500 million followers worldwide, while Jainism has around 6 million (Pew Research Center, 2020).

Source: Pew Research Center

Jainism has a particularly strong presence in the state of Rajasthan, where approximately 0.9% of the population identifies as Jain (Census of India, 2011).

Source: Census of India, 2011

Examples

Vipassana Meditation

Vipassana, a core Buddhist meditation practice, exemplifies the experience of realizing <em>Anatta</em> through observing the impermanent nature of sensations and thoughts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are there any commonalities between Buddhist and Jain religious experiences?

Despite their differences, both traditions share a commitment to non-violence, ethical conduct, and the pursuit of liberation from the cycle of rebirth. Both also emphasize the importance of self-discipline and mindfulness.

Topics Covered

Religious StudiesIndian ReligionsBuddhismJainismReligious Experience