Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Live-in relationships, once considered a social taboo in India, are increasingly becoming a visible and accepted form of marital arrangement, particularly among urban youth. Institutionalization, in a sociological context, refers to the process by which certain actions or patterns of behavior become embedded in the social structure, gaining legitimacy and predictability. The institutionalization of live-in relationships signifies a shift in societal norms, moving away from traditional, religiously sanctioned marriage as the sole acceptable framework for intimate partnerships. This process is driven by changing socio-economic conditions, evolving individual values, and a gradual re-evaluation of traditional norms.
Defining Institutionalization
Institutionalization isn’t merely about increased prevalence; it’s about the normalization of a practice. It involves the development of predictable patterns of behavior, the creation of supporting social structures (like legal frameworks, social acceptance), and the internalization of norms that legitimize the practice. A practice becomes institutionalized when it’s no longer seen as deviant but as a standard, expected, or even preferred way of doing things.
Historical Context of Live-in Relationships in India
Historically, live-in relationships were largely absent from mainstream Indian society, heavily influenced by patriarchal norms and the centrality of arranged marriages. However, with increasing urbanization, education, and exposure to Western cultures, particularly post-liberalization in 1991, the concept began to gain traction. Initially, it was largely confined to a small segment of the population, often viewed with social stigma. The late 20th and early 21st centuries witnessed a gradual increase in their visibility, fueled by changing attitudes towards marriage and gender roles.
Drivers of Institutionalization
- Socio-Economic Factors: Increased female education and economic independence have empowered women to make independent choices about their relationships. Migration to urban centers for employment often leads to delayed marriages and a preference for testing compatibility before commitment.
- Changing Values: A growing emphasis on individual autonomy, personal fulfillment, and the right to choose one’s life partner are challenging traditional norms. The concept of ‘companionate marriage’ – based on love, mutual respect, and shared interests – is gaining prominence.
- Legal Developments (Limited): While India lacks a specific law recognizing live-in relationships as equivalent to marriage, several court rulings have granted certain rights to women in such relationships, particularly concerning maintenance and property rights.
- Media Influence: Portrayal of live-in relationships in popular media (films, television, literature) has contributed to their normalization and reduced social stigma.
Legal Status and Implications
The legal landscape surrounding live-in relationships in India remains complex and ambiguous. There is no overarching legislation governing them. However, the Supreme Court has addressed the issue in several landmark cases:
| Case | Year | Key Ruling |
|---|---|---|
| Hadima Mufti v. Mod. Rabia | 2011 | Recognized the rights of a woman in a live-in relationship, stating that a live-in relationship could be considered a ‘marriage-like relationship’ for the purpose of maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. |
| S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal | 2010 | Affirmed the right to live with dignity and make personal choices, including entering into live-in relationships. |
| Indira Jaising v. Union of India | 2014 | Petition sought legal recognition of live-in relationships and protection for women in such unions. The court directed the government to consider enacting legislation. (No legislation enacted as of knowledge cutoff - 2024) |
Despite these rulings, women in live-in relationships often face challenges in claiming legal rights, particularly concerning inheritance and property. The absence of a clear legal framework creates uncertainty and vulnerability.
Consequences of Institutionalization
- Changing Family Structures: The rise of live-in relationships contributes to the diversification of family structures, moving away from the traditional nuclear family model.
- Redefinition of Marriage: The increasing acceptance of live-in relationships challenges the traditional definition of marriage and its role in society.
- Gender Dynamics: Live-in relationships can potentially promote more egalitarian gender dynamics, as they are often based on mutual consent and shared decision-making. However, power imbalances can still exist.
- Social Acceptance: Gradual acceptance by families and communities is crucial for the complete institutionalization of live-in relationships.
Conclusion
The institutionalization of live-in relationships in India is an ongoing process, driven by socio-economic changes and evolving values. While legal recognition remains limited, judicial pronouncements have provided some protection to women in such relationships. Further legislative action is needed to provide a clear and comprehensive legal framework that addresses the rights and responsibilities of individuals in live-in relationships, ensuring social justice and gender equality. The continued normalization of this practice reflects a broader shift towards individual autonomy and a re-evaluation of traditional social norms.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.