UPSC MainsSOCIOLOGY-PAPER-I201410 Marks
Q19.

What do you understand by social movement? How has the mobilization by Scheduled Castes helped them in constructing a new identity?

How to Approach

This question requires a two-pronged approach. First, define 'social movement' with relevant sociological perspectives. Second, analyze how Scheduled Caste mobilization has led to identity construction, focusing on historical phases, key leaders, and the evolving nature of their demands. Structure the answer by first defining social movements, then tracing the evolution of SC mobilization, highlighting its impact on identity formation, and finally, discussing the challenges and future prospects. Include specific examples of movements and leaders.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Social movements are collective, organized, and sustained efforts by groups of people to promote or resist social change. They represent a significant form of social action, often arising from grievances and aiming to alter power structures or societal norms. In the Indian context, the mobilization of Scheduled Castes (SCs) constitutes a crucial chapter in the history of social movements. Historically subjected to systemic discrimination and marginalization under the caste system, SCs have engaged in various forms of collective action to challenge their subordinate status and construct a new, assertive identity rooted in dignity, equality, and self-respect. This mobilization has evolved through distinct phases, each marked by specific ideologies, leaders, and strategies.

Understanding Social Movements

Social movements are not merely spontaneous outbursts of discontent; they are structured phenomena with identifiable characteristics. Sociologists like Smelser (1963) emphasize the importance of structural strain, generalized beliefs, precipitating factors, mobilization for action, and social control in explaining their emergence. Turner and Killian (1987) highlight the role of resource mobilization in sustaining movements. In essence, social movements represent a dynamic interplay of social, political, and economic factors.

Phases of Scheduled Caste Mobilization and Identity Construction

Early Phase: Religious and Educational Movements (19th - early 20th Century)

The initial phase of SC mobilization was largely spearheaded by religious and educational movements. Figures like Sri Narayana Guru Dharma Paripalana Yogam in Kerala (early 20th century) and the Satnami movement in Chhattisgarh (1846) challenged caste hierarchies through religious reform and promoted education among SCs. These movements aimed at achieving social dignity and self-reliance, laying the foundation for a collective identity based on shared experiences of oppression and a desire for upliftment. Jyotirao Phule’s work in Maharashtra also played a crucial role in raising awareness about SC issues.

The Ambedkarite Phase: Political Mobilization and Identity Assertion (1930s - 1950s)

The emergence of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar as a leader marked a turning point in SC mobilization. Ambedkar advocated for political representation, separate electorates, and constitutional safeguards for SCs. The formation of the Independent Labour Party (1936) and later the Scheduled Castes Federation (1942) demonstrated the growing political consciousness among SCs. Ambedkar’s emphasis on self-organization, education, and political participation fostered a strong sense of collective identity and agency. The drafting of the Indian Constitution with provisions for reservation and safeguards for SCs was a direct result of his advocacy.

Post-Independence Phase: Dalit Movements and Identity Politics (1960s - 1990s)

The post-independence period witnessed the rise of various Dalit movements, often characterized by a more radical and assertive approach. The Dalit Panther movement (1972) in Maharashtra, inspired by the Black Panther movement in the US, challenged the existing social order and demanded an end to caste discrimination. Movements like the Mazdoor Kisan Sangathan in Uttar Pradesh, led by Jagjivan Ram, focused on the socio-economic empowerment of Dalits. This phase saw the emergence of a distinct ‘Dalit’ identity, rejecting the stigmatizing label of ‘Scheduled Caste’ and embracing a narrative of resistance and self-determination.

Contemporary Phase: Identity Fluidity and Intersectionality (2000s - Present)

The contemporary phase is marked by increasing complexity and fluidity in SC identity. While the Dalit identity remains central, there is growing recognition of intersectional identities based on gender, class, and region. Movements like the Bhim Army (2015) in Uttar Pradesh have emerged, focusing on issues of Dalit youth and challenging state repression. The increasing use of social media and digital platforms has facilitated the mobilization of SCs and the dissemination of their narratives. However, challenges remain in addressing persistent discrimination, economic inequality, and social exclusion.

Impact on Identity Construction

  • From ‘Scheduled Caste’ to ‘Dalit’: The shift in nomenclature reflects a conscious effort to reclaim agency and reject the administrative categorization imposed by the state.
  • Collective Memory and Historical Narratives: SC mobilization has involved the construction of a collective memory of historical oppression and resistance, fostering a sense of shared identity and solidarity.
  • Cultural Expression and Assertion: Dalit literature, art, and music have played a crucial role in articulating Dalit experiences and challenging dominant narratives.
  • Political Empowerment and Representation: Increased political representation, through reservation and electoral participation, has empowered SCs and given them a voice in decision-making processes.

Conclusion

The mobilization of Scheduled Castes in India represents a powerful example of social movement leading to identity construction. From early religious reforms to contemporary intersectional movements, SCs have consistently challenged the caste system and asserted their right to dignity, equality, and self-determination. While significant progress has been made, persistent challenges remain in achieving full social and economic justice. Future efforts must focus on addressing systemic discrimination, promoting inclusive development, and fostering a society that truly values diversity and equality. The ongoing evolution of SC identity reflects a dynamic process of negotiation, resistance, and self-redefinition.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Social Stratification
A system by which society ranks categories of people in a hierarchy. It is a characteristic of society, not simply a reflection of individual differences.
Resource Mobilization Theory
A sociological theory that explains social movements as a result of the ability of movement actors to acquire and deploy resources, such as money, labor, and media attention.

Key Statistics

As per the 2011 Census of India, the Scheduled Caste population constitutes 16.6% of the total population.

Source: Census of India, 2011

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data (2022), crimes against Scheduled Castes increased by 9.1% compared to 2021.

Source: NCRB, 2022 (Knowledge Cutoff: Sept 2023)

Examples

Una Dalit Atrocity (2016)

The public flogging of Dalit men in Una, Gujarat, for skinning a dead cow sparked widespread protests and highlighted the continued prevalence of caste-based violence and discrimination.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between 'Dalit' and 'Scheduled Caste'?

‘Scheduled Caste’ is a constitutional category used for administrative purposes, while ‘Dalit’ is a self-chosen identity that signifies oppression and struggle. It represents a rejection of the stigmatizing label of ‘Scheduled Caste’.

Topics Covered

Social MovementsCaste SystemIndian SocietySocial MovementsScheduled CastesIdentityMobilizationCaste System