Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Trust is a fundamental pillar of any relationship, be it personal, professional, or international. It represents a firm belief in the reliability, truth, honesty, or ability of someone or something. When this trust is violated, it leads to a significant disruption. The question asks us to identify the more fitting term – 'breach' or 'break' – to describe the act of going back on one's word, which inherently damages trust. Both words imply a form of disruption, but their connotations differ significantly, making one more suitable than the other in this context.
Understanding the Terms
Both 'breach' and 'break' signify a disruption or violation. However, their application and implications differ.
- Break: Generally implies a sudden and often forceful separation or shattering of something. It suggests a complete severing of a connection. While it can be used in the context of promises, it often lacks the formal weight associated with a violation of a formal agreement or expectation.
- Breach: Specifically denotes a violation of a law, agreement, or code of conduct. It carries a stronger connotation of a formal obligation being broken, and often implies a legal or moral responsibility.
Analyzing the Context of Trust
Going back on one's word is not merely a separation; it's a violation of an implicit or explicit agreement. Trust is built on the expectation of consistency and reliability. When someone reneges on their promise, they are violating the understanding that formed the basis of that trust. This violation is more accurately described as a 'breach' because it suggests a transgression against a pre-existing obligation.
Why 'Breach' is the Superior Choice
The sentence "Going back on your word is a breach of trust" is more precise and impactful than "Going back on your word is a break of trust." 'Breach' highlights the seriousness of the act and its implications for the relationship. It suggests a deliberate act of violating a commitment, whereas 'break' can sometimes imply an unintentional or unavoidable circumstance.
Illustrative Examples
- A politician failing to fulfill an election promise commits a breach of public trust.
- A company violating its contract with a supplier commits a breach of contract.
- While a friendship might experience a break due to misunderstandings, a betrayal of confidence is a breach of trust.
Legal and Ethical Implications
The term 'breach' is frequently used in legal contexts, such as 'breach of contract' or 'breach of fiduciary duty'. This association reinforces its connection to formal obligations and violations. Ethically, going back on one's word is a violation of the principle of integrity, which is closely linked to the concept of a 'breach' of trust.
| Word | Connotation | Context of Trust |
|---|---|---|
| Break | Sudden separation, shattering | Less formal, can imply unintentional disruption |
| Breach | Violation of obligation, transgression | Formal, implies deliberate violation of commitment |
Conclusion
In conclusion, while both 'break' and 'breach' can describe a disruption, 'breach' is the more appropriate word to complete the sentence. It accurately conveys the seriousness of going back on one's word and its damaging effect on trust, highlighting the violation of an implicit or explicit agreement. The term carries a stronger connotation of a formal obligation being broken, making it the superior choice in this context.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.