Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Henrik Ibsen’s *A Doll’s House*, published in 1879, remains a seminal work in feminist literature, challenging conventional Victorian societal norms surrounding marriage and gender roles. The play centers around Nora Helmer, a seemingly frivolous wife who ultimately rebels against her controlling husband, Torvald. Torvald Helmer, a lawyer and the head of the household, embodies the patriarchal values of the time. His surprise at Nora’s decision to leave is not merely a personal shock, but a consequence of his deeply ingrained beliefs about women, marriage, and societal expectations. This essay will examine Torvald’s role in the play and analyze the reasons behind his utter disbelief at Nora’s assertion of independence.
Torvald Helmer: A Portrait of Patriarchal Control
Torvald Helmer is presented as a man obsessed with maintaining his reputation and social standing. He views Nora not as an equal partner, but as a possession – a beautiful “doll” to be admired and controlled. This is evident in his pet names for her – “skylark,” “squirrel,” “little songbird” – which infantilize her and deny her agency. He dictates her spending, her social interactions, and even her thoughts, believing he knows what is best for her.
The Illusion of a Harmonious Marriage
Torvald’s control is masked by a veneer of affection and concern. He believes he is acting in Nora’s best interest, protecting her from the harsh realities of the world. He enjoys the role of provider and protector, reinforcing his sense of masculine authority. He consistently emphasizes the importance of appearances and societal expectations, prioritizing his own reputation above Nora’s happiness or fulfillment. This is particularly evident in his reaction to Krogstad’s blackmail, where his primary concern is not Nora’s well-being, but the potential damage to his career.
Torvald’s Moral Framework and Hypocrisy
Torvald adheres to a rigid moral code, condemning any deviation from societal norms. He is particularly judgmental of dishonesty and deceit. However, his own actions reveal a degree of hypocrisy. He readily accepts the benefits of Nora’s secret loan, which saved his life, yet condemns her for obtaining it without his knowledge. This double standard highlights his self-centeredness and his inability to see Nora as a complex individual with her own motivations.
Why the Rebellion Takes Him By Surprise
Torvald’s surprise at Nora’s rebellion stems from several factors:
- His Limited Perception of Nora: He fails to recognize Nora’s intelligence, resourcefulness, and inner strength. He sees her only as a charming, childlike figure incapable of independent thought or action.
- Societal Conditioning: Victorian society reinforced the idea of women as subservient to men. Torvald, a product of his time, genuinely believes that a woman’s primary role is to be a wife and mother, and that she is incapable of making rational decisions outside the domestic sphere.
- His Ego and Self-Importance: Torvald’s self-image is deeply tied to his role as the head of the household and the moral compass of his family. Nora’s rebellion challenges his authority and shatters his carefully constructed world.
- The Illusion of Control: He believes his control over Nora is absolute and that she is entirely dependent on him. He is unable to comprehend that she might desire something more than a life of domesticity and subservience.
The Dramatic Irony of Torvald’s Awakening
The play utilizes dramatic irony to highlight Torvald’s blindness. The audience is aware of Nora’s growing dissatisfaction and her developing sense of self, while Torvald remains oblivious. His final, desperate attempts to regain control – his pleas for her to stay for the children and to maintain appearances – only serve to underscore his selfishness and his inability to understand her needs. His realization that his marriage was a sham, and that he never truly knew Nora, is a devastating blow to his ego and his worldview.
Conclusion
Torvald Helmer’s character serves as a powerful critique of patriarchal structures and the limitations they impose on both men and women. His surprise at Nora’s rebellion is not simply a personal failing, but a symptom of a deeply flawed societal system. Ibsen’s play forces audiences to confront uncomfortable truths about gender roles, power dynamics, and the importance of individual autonomy. The enduring relevance of *A Doll’s House* lies in its ability to spark dialogue about these issues and to challenge conventional notions of marriage and identity.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.