UPSC MainsGENERAL-STUDIES-PAPER-II201512 Marks200 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q4.

Khap Panchayats: Rights Violations & Legal Action

Khap Panchayats have been in the news for functioning as extra-constitutional authorities, often delivering pronouncements amounting to human rights violations. Discuss critically the actions taken by the legislative, executive and the judiciary to set the things right in this regard.

How to Approach

This question requires a critical assessment of the responses of the three pillars of the state – legislative, executive, and judiciary – to the issue of Khap Panchayats. The answer should begin by defining Khap Panchayats and outlining their problematic functioning. Then, it should systematically analyze the actions taken by each pillar, highlighting their successes and limitations. A balanced approach, acknowledging the complexities involved, is crucial. Structure the answer into introduction, body (legislative, executive, judiciary), and conclusion.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Khap Panchayats, traditional caste-based councils prevalent in Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh, have increasingly drawn scrutiny for their extra-judicial pronouncements, often violating fundamental rights and posing a challenge to the rule of law. These councils, historically resolving local disputes, have been accused of issuing diktats on matters of marriage, honour killings, and social conduct, frequently infringing upon individual liberties. The actions of Khap Panchayats have raised serious concerns about human rights violations and the authority of constitutional institutions, prompting interventions from the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of the government.

Legislative Actions

The legislative response to Khap Panchayats has been largely indirect, focusing on strengthening existing laws rather than enacting specific legislation targeting them directly.

  • Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013: Introduced the concept of ‘honour killings’ as a specific offence and prescribed stricter punishments, aiming to deter Khap Panchayats from sanctioning such acts. However, its effectiveness is debated due to implementation challenges.
  • Provisions within the Indian Penal Code (IPC): Sections related to unlawful assembly, abetment, and conspiracy are often invoked against members of Khap Panchayats involved in illegal activities.
  • Lack of Direct Legislation: There has been reluctance to enact specific laws against Khap Panchayats due to concerns about alienating certain communities and the potential for political backlash.

Executive Actions

The executive branch, primarily through state governments and law enforcement agencies, has taken several steps to address the issue.

  • Issuance of Advisories: State governments have issued advisories to police forces to proactively monitor Khap Panchayat activities and prevent illegal pronouncements.
  • Registration of FIRs: Police have registered First Information Reports (FIRs) against Khap Panchayat members involved in issuing illegal diktats or inciting violence. However, conviction rates remain low.
  • Awareness Campaigns: Some state governments have launched awareness campaigns to educate the public about the illegality of Khap Panchayat decisions and the importance of reporting violations.
  • Challenges in Implementation: Executive action is often hampered by social pressures, political considerations, and a lack of resources. Local police may be hesitant to act decisively against influential Khap leaders.

Judicial Interventions

The judiciary has played a crucial role in curbing the excesses of Khap Panchayats through various interventions.

  • Public Interest Litigations (PILs): Several PILs have been filed challenging the actions of Khap Panchayats, leading to judicial scrutiny and directions to state governments.
  • Supreme Court Directives: The Supreme Court has repeatedly condemned Khap Panchayats for violating fundamental rights and interfering with the legal system. In Shakti Vahini v. State of Haryana (2018), the Court issued guidelines to prevent honour killings and protect couples from harassment.
  • High Court Rulings: Various High Courts have declared Khap Panchayat diktats illegal and unconstitutional, emphasizing the supremacy of the law.
  • Limitations: Judicial interventions are often reactive, addressing specific cases rather than preventing the problem at its root. Enforcement of judicial orders can also be challenging.
Pillar Actions Taken Effectiveness
Legislative Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, IPC provisions Limited; Implementation challenges, lack of direct legislation
Executive Advisories, FIRs, Awareness Campaigns Moderate; hampered by social pressures and resource constraints
Judiciary PILs, Supreme Court/High Court rulings Significant; but often reactive and enforcement is a challenge

Conclusion

While the legislative, executive, and judiciary have all taken steps to address the issue of Khap Panchayats, a comprehensive and sustained approach is needed. Strengthening law enforcement, promoting education and awareness, and addressing the underlying social and cultural factors that contribute to the influence of Khap Panchayats are crucial. A more proactive legislative framework, coupled with effective executive implementation and continued judicial oversight, is essential to ensure that these extra-constitutional bodies operate within the bounds of the law and respect fundamental rights. The challenge lies in balancing the need to uphold the rule of law with the sensitivity required to address deeply entrenched social norms.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Khap Panchayat
A traditional caste-based council prevalent in North India, primarily in Haryana, Punjab, and Uttar Pradesh, that historically resolved local disputes but has increasingly been associated with extra-judicial pronouncements and human rights violations.
Honour Killing
The intentional killing of a person who is perceived to have brought dishonour upon their family or community, often due to inter-caste or inter-religious marriage or perceived violation of social norms.

Key Statistics

According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), cases related to honour killings have shown a fluctuating trend, with 28 cases reported in 2015, 79 in 2016, 25 in 2017, and 28 in 2018. (Data as of knowledge cutoff - 2024)

Source: NCRB Reports

As per a 2018 report by the National Commission for Women (NCW), approximately 300 honour killings are reported annually in India, although the actual number is believed to be significantly higher due to underreporting. (Data as of knowledge cutoff - 2024)

Source: National Commission for Women (NCW)

Examples

Case of Haryana Khap Panchayat Diktat

In 2017, a Khap Panchayat in Haryana issued a diktat prohibiting women from using mobile phones in public places, sparking widespread outrage and condemnation from women's rights activists. This exemplifies the overreach of Khap Panchayats into personal liberties.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are Khap Panchayats still influential despite legal challenges?

Khap Panchayats retain influence due to deeply rooted social norms, caste structures, and a lack of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in rural areas. They often enjoy local political support and operate with a degree of impunity.

Topics Covered

PolitySocial IssuesLaw & OrderExtrajudicial BodiesGender InequalityConstitutional ValidityJudicial Intervention