UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-I201510 Marks150 Words
Q1.

Critically examine the following statements in about 150 words each : "Annexation of Punjab was part of a broad north-west frontier policy set in motion after the exit of Maharaja Ranjit Singh."

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the political and strategic context surrounding the annexation of Punjab in 1849. The answer should move beyond simply stating the annexation was a result of Dalhousie’s policies and delve into the broader British anxieties regarding the North-West Frontier. Key points to cover include the weakening of the Sikh Empire post-Ranjit Singh, the ‘forward policy’, the First Anglo-Sikh War, the Second Anglo-Sikh War, and the strategic importance of Punjab for British India’s security. Structure the answer chronologically, highlighting how events unfolded and contributed to the final annexation.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The annexation of Punjab in 1849 marked a pivotal moment in the consolidation of British power in India. While often attributed to Lord Dalhousie’s aggressive policies and the Doctrine of Lapse, a more comprehensive understanding reveals that the annexation was deeply embedded within a larger ‘north-west frontier policy’ initiated in the wake of Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s death in 1839. Ranjit Singh’s strong Sikh Empire had acted as a buffer against external threats, particularly from Russia. His demise created a power vacuum and anxieties about potential instability, prompting the British to proactively secure their northern borders and expand their influence in the region. This policy wasn’t merely opportunistic; it was driven by strategic considerations of imperial security.

The Post-Ranjit Singh Scenario and Initial British Concerns

Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s death in 1839 plunged the Sikh Empire into a period of internal strife and political instability. The ensuing succession struggles, coupled with the rise of the Dogra brothers and the Khalsa army’s increasing influence, weakened the empire considerably. The British, observing this decline, became increasingly concerned about the potential for anarchy and the possibility of other powers – particularly Russia – exploiting the situation. This fear fueled the development of a ‘forward policy’ aimed at extending British influence and control towards the north-west frontier.

The First Anglo-Sikh War (1845-46)

The First Anglo-Sikh War was a direct consequence of British anxieties and attempts to assert control. The British, under Sir Hugh Gough, sought to preemptively control Sikh territories, leading to clashes. The Sikh army, despite initial successes, was ultimately defeated due to internal divisions and British military superiority. The Treaty of Lahore (1846) imposed harsh terms on the Sikhs, including the cession of territory, a large indemnity, and the stationing of British troops in the Punjab. However, the treaty didn’t fully address British concerns about long-term stability.

The Second Anglo-Sikh War and the Annexation (1848-49)

The presence of British troops and the perceived heavy-handedness of the British Resident, Henry Lawrence, led to growing resentment among the Sikh population. This culminated in the Second Anglo-Sikh War, sparked by the Multan revolt led by Diwan Mulraj. The revolt spread, and the Khalsa army rose up against British authority. Again, despite initial Sikh resistance, the British, under Dalhousie, decisively defeated the Sikhs.

Following the final defeat, Dalhousie formally annexed the Punjab in 1849. He justified this action by citing the alleged misrule of the Sikh rulers and the need to establish order. However, the annexation was undeniably a culmination of the north-west frontier policy, designed to secure British India’s borders and prevent Russian expansion. The annexation wasn’t simply a reaction to events; it was a proactive step taken to consolidate British control over a strategically vital region.

Strategic Significance of Punjab

Punjab held immense strategic importance for the British. It served as a crucial buffer state against potential Russian aggression through Afghanistan. Controlling Punjab allowed the British to secure the passes of the Himalayas and maintain a strong military presence on the frontier. Furthermore, the fertile lands of the Punjab provided a valuable source of revenue and manpower for the British Empire. The annexation, therefore, was not merely a territorial acquisition but a vital component of British imperial strategy.

Event Year Significance
Death of Ranjit Singh 1839 Created a power vacuum and triggered British anxieties about the North-West Frontier.
First Anglo-Sikh War 1845-46 Demonstrated Sikh military strength but ultimately led to territorial concessions and British influence.
Second Anglo-Sikh War 1848-49 Provided the pretext for the complete annexation of Punjab.
Annexation of Punjab 1849 Consolidated British control over a strategically vital region and secured the North-West Frontier.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the annexation of Punjab was not an isolated event but a logical outcome of the broader north-west frontier policy initiated after Ranjit Singh’s death. Driven by strategic concerns about Russian expansion and the need to secure British India’s borders, the British proactively sought to extend their influence and ultimately annex the Sikh Empire. While Dalhousie’s policies undoubtedly played a role, framing the annexation solely as an act of aggression overlooks the underlying geopolitical considerations that shaped British policy in the region. The annexation of Punjab fundamentally altered the political landscape of the subcontinent and laid the foundation for British dominance in the North-West Frontier.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Topics Covered

HistoryModern IndiaColonialismBritish IndiaPunjab HistoryNorth-West FrontierColonial Expansion