UPSC MainsPHILOSOPHY-PAPER-I201510 Marks150 Words
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q15.

Write a critical note on the attributes of God.

How to Approach

This question requires a philosophical exploration of the attributes traditionally ascribed to God. A good answer will demonstrate understanding of both theistic and atheistic perspectives, referencing key philosophical arguments. Structure the answer by first defining 'attributes of God', then discussing classical attributes (omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence), followed by a critical examination of the problems these attributes pose (logical inconsistencies, the problem of evil). Finally, explore alternative conceptions of God. Focus on thinkers like Aquinas, Hume, and Kant.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The concept of God has been central to philosophical inquiry for millennia. Attributes of God refer to the qualities or characteristics traditionally believed to define the divine being. These attributes, often understood within a theistic framework, aim to describe the nature of ultimate reality. Historically, these attributes have been categorized as perfection attributes (omnipotence, omniscience, omnibenevolence) and relational attributes (love, justice). However, the very notion of ascribing attributes to an infinite being has been subject to intense scrutiny, leading to significant philosophical debate regarding their coherence and compatibility. This note will critically examine these attributes, exploring both their traditional formulations and the challenges they present.

Classical Attributes of God

Traditionally, three attributes have been considered paramount in defining God: omnipotence (all-powerful), omniscience (all-knowing), and omnibenevolence (all-good). These attributes, particularly as articulated by Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica, form the basis of much Western theological thought.

  • Omnipotence: The capacity to do anything logically possible. This doesn’t imply the ability to do logically contradictory things (e.g., create a square circle).
  • Omniscience: Complete and perfect knowledge of all things, past, present, and future. This raises questions about free will and determinism.
  • Omnibenevolence: Perfect goodness and loving kindness. This attribute is central to theodicy – attempts to reconcile the existence of God with the existence of evil.

Critical Examination of the Attributes

These attributes, while seemingly straightforward, are fraught with philosophical difficulties.

The Problem of Evil

Perhaps the most significant challenge to the classical attributes is the problem of evil. If God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, why does evil exist? Various theodicies attempt to address this, including:

  • Free Will Defense: Evil arises from the misuse of free will granted to humans. (Augustine, Plantinga)
  • Soul-Making Theodicy: Evil is necessary for moral and spiritual development. (Irenaeus, Hick)
  • Process Theology: God is not all-powerful in the sense of coercive control, but rather influences events through persuasion. (Whitehead)

However, critics argue that these theodicies are insufficient to explain the sheer scale and gratuitous nature of suffering.

Logical Inconsistencies

The attributes themselves can appear logically inconsistent. For example, if God is omniscient and knows the future, does this negate human free will? If God is immutable (unchanging), how can he respond to prayer or human actions? Hume, in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, extensively critiques the notion of an anthropomorphic God possessing these attributes.

The Paradox of Omnipotence

The classic paradox asks: can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it? If he can, he is not omnipotent because he cannot lift the stone. If he cannot, he is not omnipotent because he cannot create the stone. This highlights the limitations of applying human concepts of power to an infinite being.

Alternative Conceptions of God

In response to these challenges, alternative conceptions of God have emerged.

  • Deism: God created the universe but does not intervene in its affairs.
  • Pantheism: God is identical with the universe.
  • Panentheism: God is in everything, and everything is in God, but God is more than the universe.
  • Kant’s Moral God: Kant argued that the existence of God cannot be proven through reason, but is a necessary postulate of practical reason for the sake of morality.

These alternative conceptions often attempt to avoid the logical problems associated with the classical attributes by redefining the nature of God.

Conclusion

The attributes of God, while central to theological and philosophical discourse, are not without their difficulties. The classical attributes of omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence face significant challenges from the problem of evil and logical inconsistencies. Consequently, alternative conceptions of God have emerged, seeking to reconcile the divine with the realities of human experience. Ultimately, the question of God’s attributes remains a complex and contested issue, demanding ongoing philosophical reflection.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Theodicy
The attempt to reconcile the existence of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God with the existence of evil and suffering in the world.
Anthropomorphism
The attribution of human characteristics or behavior to a god, animal, or inanimate object.

Key Statistics

Approximately 84% of the world's population identifies with a religious group as of 2023.

Source: Pew Research Center, 2023

According to a 2021 Gallup poll, 81% of Americans believe in God.

Source: Gallup, 2021

Examples

The Eutychro Dilemma

Presented by Plato in the <em>Euthyphro</em> dialogue, this dilemma questions whether something is good because God commands it, or whether God commands it because it is good. This challenges the basis of divine command theory and the nature of moral goodness.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is it possible to prove the existence of God?

Philosophical arguments for God’s existence (e.g., ontological, cosmological, teleological) have been debated for centuries. No argument has achieved universal acceptance, and the question remains open to interpretation and belief.

Topics Covered

PhilosophyReligionTheologyPhilosophy of ReligionReligious Beliefs