Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
The concept of God has been central to philosophical inquiry for millennia. Defining the ‘attributes of God’ involves identifying the qualities traditionally believed to characterize the divine being. These attributes, often understood within a theistic framework, aim to describe God’s nature and relationship to the universe. Historically, these attributes have included perfection, immutability, eternity, omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence. However, these attributes are not without their philosophical challenges, leading to ongoing debates about the coherence and plausibility of the concept of God. This note will critically examine these attributes, exploring both their traditional formulations and the criticisms leveled against them.
Classical Attributes of God
Traditionally, God is ascribed several key attributes. These are often presented as necessary properties of the divine being:
- Omnipotence: The attribute of all-powerfulness. God can do anything logically possible.
- Omniscience: The attribute of all-knowingness. God knows everything, past, present, and future.
- Omnibenevolence: The attribute of perfect goodness. God is perfectly moral and desires the well-being of all creation.
- Immutability: God is unchanging in nature and character.
- Eternality: God exists outside of time, being neither limited by past nor future.
Critical Examination of Attributes
The Problem of Evil
Perhaps the most significant challenge to the classical attributes is the problem of evil. If God is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, why does evil exist? Several theodicies (attempts to justify God’s allowance of evil) have been proposed. For example, the Free Will Defense argues that God allows evil because it is a necessary consequence of granting humans free will. However, critics argue this doesn’t explain natural evil (e.g., earthquakes, diseases). The Soul-Making Theodicy, popularized by Irenaeus and later John Hick, suggests that evil is necessary for moral and spiritual development. However, the sheer scale and intensity of suffering raise questions about the proportionality of this ‘soul-making’ process.
Logical Inconsistencies
Some philosophers argue that certain attributes are logically incompatible. For instance, the combination of omnipotence and immutability can be problematic. Can an immutable God truly respond to prayer or intervene in the world? Furthermore, the concept of omniscience raises questions about free will. If God knows the future, are our choices truly free, or are they predetermined? Hume, in his Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, extensively critiques the notion of an all-powerful creator, questioning the intelligibility of attributing human-like qualities to an infinite being.
The Attribute of Simplicity
Some theologians, like Aquinas, advocate for the ‘attribute of simplicity’, arguing that God is not composed of parts or attributes. Rather, God *is* simply being itself. This attempts to resolve some of the logical inconsistencies by denying that God possesses distinct attributes in the way that finite beings do. However, this raises the question of how we can meaningfully speak about God at all if God is beyond all categorization.
Alternative Conceptions of God
In response to the challenges posed by the classical attributes, alternative conceptions of God have emerged. Process theology, for example, developed by Alfred North Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne, proposes a God who is not immutable but is constantly evolving in response to the world. God is not all-powerful in the sense of being able to control everything, but rather is persuasive and influences events through attraction rather than coercion. Panentheism, closely related to process theology, posits that God is *in* everything, and everything is *in* God, but God is more than the universe. These conceptions attempt to reconcile the existence of evil with a benevolent God and address the logical problems associated with traditional attributes.
| Attribute | Traditional View | Criticism |
|---|---|---|
| Omnipotence | God can do anything logically possible. | Paradoxes of omnipotence (e.g., can God create a stone He cannot lift?). |
| Omniscience | God knows everything, past, present, and future. | Conflicts with free will; determinism. |
| Omnibenevolence | God is perfectly good. | The problem of evil; suffering in the world. |
Conclusion
The attributes of God, while central to theological and philosophical discourse, are subject to significant scrutiny. The classical attributes, while intuitively appealing to many, face formidable challenges from the problem of evil and logical inconsistencies. Alternative conceptions, such as process theology and panentheism, offer potential resolutions but introduce their own complexities. Ultimately, the question of God’s attributes remains a deeply contested and nuanced area of philosophical inquiry, reflecting the inherent limitations of human attempts to comprehend the divine.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.