UPSC MainsPUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION-PAPER-II201520 Marks
Q9.

The objectives, approaches and organisational arrangements for decision-making of the NITI Aayog aim at restoring the federal character of the Indian polity. Explain.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the historical context of Centre-State relations in India, the shortcomings of the Planning Commission, and the structural and functional aspects of NITI Aayog. The answer should focus on how NITI Aayog’s objectives (cooperative federalism, bottom-up planning), approaches (participatory governance, competitive federalism), and organizational arrangements (Governing Council, Special Invitee Members) aim to address the imbalances inherent in the previous system and promote a more collaborative federal structure. A comparative analysis with the Planning Commission will be beneficial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Indian Constitution, while establishing a federal structure, has historically exhibited a strong centralizing tendency. The Planning Commission, established in 1950, despite its role in economic development, was often criticized for being a top-down, centrally controlled body that undermined the autonomy of states. With the dissolution of the Planning Commission in 2014, NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India) was established as a replacement, with a stated objective of fostering ‘cooperative and competitive federalism’. This answer will explore how the objectives, approaches, and organizational arrangements of NITI Aayog are designed to restore the federal character of the Indian polity.

Historical Context: Centre-State Relations & the Planning Commission

Prior to NITI Aayog, Centre-State relations were often characterized by fiscal imbalances, with the Centre controlling a significant portion of revenue resources. The Planning Commission, while instrumental in formulating Five-Year Plans, operated largely as an extension of the central government. States had limited say in plan formulation and resource allocation. This led to accusations of the Commission being a ‘centralizing force’ and hindering the development of states based on their specific needs and priorities.

Objectives of NITI Aayog & Federalism

NITI Aayog’s core objectives directly address the shortcomings of the previous system:

  • Cooperative Federalism: NITI Aayog aims to move away from a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to planning and development, recognizing the diverse needs and strengths of different states. It emphasizes collaboration and partnership between the Centre and states.
  • Bottom-Up Planning: Unlike the top-down approach of the Planning Commission, NITI Aayog advocates for a bottom-up approach, where states and local bodies are actively involved in identifying priorities and formulating plans.
  • Promoting Competition: NITI Aayog introduces the concept of ‘competitive federalism’ through initiatives like the State Performance Index, encouraging states to benchmark themselves against each other and strive for better performance.
  • Addressing Regional Disparities: NITI Aayog focuses on reducing regional disparities by promoting inclusive growth and ensuring that the benefits of development reach all sections of society.

Approaches of NITI Aayog & Federalism

NITI Aayog employs several approaches to achieve its objectives and strengthen federalism:

  • Participatory Governance: NITI Aayog encourages stakeholder consultations, including state governments, experts, and civil society organizations, in the policy-making process.
  • Knowledge Sharing & Capacity Building: NITI Aayog facilitates knowledge sharing and capacity building among states, enabling them to learn from each other’s best practices.
  • Policy & Program Design: NITI Aayog provides policy and program design support to states, helping them to develop innovative solutions to their specific challenges.
  • Monitoring & Evaluation: NITI Aayog monitors the progress of states in achieving their development goals and provides feedback for improvement.

Organizational Arrangements & Federalism

The organizational structure of NITI Aayog is designed to promote greater state participation and ownership:

  • Governing Council: Composed of the Prime Minister, Chief Ministers of all states, and Lieutenant Governors of Union Territories. This is the apex body of NITI Aayog and provides a platform for regular dialogue and collaboration between the Centre and states.
  • National Advisory Council: Includes eminent experts and scholars, providing valuable insights and guidance to NITI Aayog.
  • Special Invitee Members: Representatives from various ministries and departments, ensuring inter-ministerial coordination.
  • Secretariat: Provides administrative support to NITI Aayog and facilitates its operations.

The Governing Council, in particular, is a significant departure from the Planning Commission’s structure. It ensures that states have a direct voice in shaping national policies and priorities. The emphasis on state representation and participation in decision-making processes is a key element in restoring the federal character of the Indian polity.

Comparative Analysis: Planning Commission vs. NITI Aayog

Feature Planning Commission NITI Aayog
Approach Top-down, Centrally Controlled Bottom-up, Cooperative & Competitive
State Involvement Limited Significant, through Governing Council
Focus Five-Year Plans Long-term strategic vision, policy formulation
Structure Deputy Chairman led Prime Minister led

Conclusion

NITI Aayog, through its objectives, approaches, and organizational arrangements, represents a significant shift towards a more collaborative and decentralized governance model in India. While challenges remain in fully realizing its potential – including ensuring adequate resource transfer to states and addressing inter-state disparities – NITI Aayog has undoubtedly contributed to restoring the federal character of the Indian polity by empowering states and fostering a spirit of cooperative and competitive federalism. Its success will depend on continued commitment from both the Centre and states to work together in a spirit of partnership and mutual respect.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Cooperative Federalism
A system where the Centre and States collaborate and work together in areas of mutual concern, respecting each other’s autonomy and jurisdiction.
Competitive Federalism
A system where states compete with each other to attract investment, improve governance, and achieve better socio-economic outcomes, leading to overall national development.

Key Statistics

As of 2023, the share of states in the divisible pool of central taxes is 41% as per the 15th Finance Commission recommendations.

Source: Ministry of Finance, Government of India (Knowledge Cutoff: 2024)

According to the NITI Aayog’s State Health Index (2019-20), Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Punjab emerged as the top-performing states in terms of healthcare outcomes.

Source: NITI Aayog, State Health Index (Knowledge Cutoff: 2024)

Examples

Goods and Services Tax (GST) Council

The GST Council, comprising representatives from the Centre and all states, exemplifies cooperative federalism in action. It demonstrates a collaborative approach to policy-making and revenue sharing.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has NITI Aayog completely eliminated central control over planning?

No, NITI Aayog doesn’t eliminate central control entirely. It shifts the focus from directive planning to facilitative planning, providing guidance and support to states while respecting their autonomy. The Centre still plays a crucial role in coordinating national priorities and resource allocation.

Topics Covered

GovernanceAdministrationPlanningNITI AayogFederalismPlanning