UPSC MainsENGLISH-LITERATURE-PAPER-II201610 Marks150 Words
Q17.

The balance of antipathy and sympathy in A Passage to India.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of E.M. Forster’s *A Passage to India*. The answer should avoid simplistic binaries and demonstrate how Forster intricately weaves together feelings of both antipathy and sympathy between the English colonizers and the Indian natives. Focus on key characters (Adela, Aziz, Fielding) and pivotal events (the Marabar Caves incident) to illustrate this balance. Structure the answer by first defining the terms, then analyzing how antipathy manifests, followed by an exploration of sympathy, and finally, a synthesis of both.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

E.M. Forster’s *A Passage to India*, published in 1924, is a complex exploration of the relationships between the British colonizers and the Indian people in the early 20th century. The novel doesn’t present a straightforward depiction of hostility; rather, it portrays a delicate and often unsettling balance between antipathy – a deep-seated feeling of aversion – and sympathy – a feeling of understanding and shared experience. This balance isn’t merely a thematic element but a structural principle, shaping the narrative and ultimately questioning the possibility of genuine connection within a colonial context. The novel’s power lies in its refusal to offer easy answers, instead presenting a multifaceted portrayal of human interaction under the pressures of imperialism.

Manifestations of Antipathy

Antipathy in *A Passage to India* is primarily rooted in the racial prejudices and social hierarchies of British colonialism. This is evident in several ways:

  • The ‘White Man’s Burden’ mentality: Many British characters, like Mrs. Moore’s acquaintance, Turton, embody a sense of superiority and distrust towards Indians. They view Indians as fundamentally different and incapable of understanding English values.
  • Social Segregation: The novel highlights the strict social boundaries maintained by the British community in Chandrapore. The reluctance to form genuine friendships with Indians, as seen in the initial interactions between the English club members and Aziz, demonstrates this antipathy.
  • The Marabar Caves Incident: The ambiguous event in the caves serves as a catalyst for the eruption of pre-existing prejudices. Adela’s initial accusation against Aziz, fueled by panic and misunderstanding, is a direct consequence of this ingrained antipathy.
  • Stereotyping: The British characters often rely on stereotypes when perceiving Indians, reducing them to simplistic and often negative representations. This is particularly evident in their assumptions about Aziz’s character and motives.

Expressions of Sympathy

Despite the pervasive antipathy, Forster also portrays moments of genuine sympathy and connection:

  • Mrs. Moore’s Initial Openness: Mrs. Moore, upon arriving in India, displays a willingness to connect with Indians on a human level, transcending racial barriers. Her attempts to understand Aziz and her genuine curiosity about Indian culture represent a rare instance of sympathy.
  • Fielding’s Intellectual Curiosity: Cyril Fielding, a liberal-minded schoolmaster, actively seeks to bridge the gap between the two cultures. He befriends Aziz and attempts to understand the complexities of Indian society.
  • Aziz’s Capacity for Friendship: Aziz, despite experiencing prejudice, demonstrates a capacity for generosity and friendship, particularly towards Fielding. His initial warmth towards Mrs. Moore also highlights his openness to connection.
  • Shared Humanity: The novel suggests that beneath the surface of cultural differences, there exists a shared human experience. Moments of shared laughter, vulnerability, and emotional connection between characters hint at this underlying unity.

The Interplay and Synthesis

Forster doesn’t present antipathy and sympathy as mutually exclusive forces. Instead, they coexist and often intertwine. The novel demonstrates how even well-intentioned attempts at sympathy can be undermined by ingrained prejudices and the structural inequalities of colonialism. For example, Fielding’s sympathy for Aziz is tested by the societal pressures and the prevailing atmosphere of distrust. The ambiguity surrounding the Marabar Caves incident further complicates this interplay, leaving the reader questioning the true nature of events and the motivations of the characters.

The novel’s ending, with Aziz and Fielding failing to truly connect despite their best efforts, underscores the difficulty of overcoming the barriers created by colonialism and cultural difference. The vastness of the Indian landscape, symbolized by the Ganges River, represents the insurmountable obstacles to genuine understanding.

Conclusion

*A Passage to India* masterfully portrays the complex and often contradictory emotions that characterized the relationship between the British and the Indians during the colonial era. Forster’s nuanced depiction of both antipathy and sympathy reveals the limitations of individual goodwill in the face of systemic prejudice and the enduring legacy of imperialism. The novel’s enduring power lies in its refusal to offer easy resolutions, instead prompting readers to confront the uncomfortable truths about power, identity, and the challenges of cross-cultural understanding.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Imperialism
A policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means.
Orientalism
A way of seeing that imagines a group of people as exotic or backward, often used to justify colonial domination. Edward Said’s work popularized this concept.

Key Statistics

By 1900, the British Empire ruled over approximately 450 million people, one-quarter of the world’s population.

Source: Porter, Bernard. *The Lion’s Share: A Short History of British Imperialism, 1850-1924* (1963).

In 1921, the population of British India was approximately 319 million.

Source: Census of India, 1921 (Knowledge cutoff 2023)

Examples

The Amritsar Massacre (1919)

The Jallianwala Bagh massacre, where British troops fired on unarmed Indian civilians, exemplifies the brutal realities of colonial rule and the deep-seated antipathy towards Indians.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Forster himself critical of British colonialism?

While not overtly political, Forster’s work, particularly *A Passage to India*, subtly critiques the arrogance and insensitivity of British colonial officials and the damaging effects of imperialism on both colonizers and colonized.