UPSC MainsENGLISH-LITERATURE-PAPER-II201615 Marks
Q25.

Consider the statement that "the subaltern nature of Kanthapura arises when the women of the village assume power in the absence of their men, who have fled to the jungle."

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of Raja Rao’s *Kanthapura* and its portrayal of gender dynamics within a traditional Indian village undergoing political awakening. The answer should focus on how the absence of men, due to their involvement in the freedom struggle and subsequent legal troubles, creates a power vacuum filled by the women. It needs to analyze the nature of this power – is it truly empowering, or a temporary shift within existing patriarchal structures? The structure should involve defining ‘subaltern’, outlining the context of male absence, analyzing the women’s actions, and finally, evaluating the extent to which their assumption of power can be considered ‘subaltern’.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Raja Rao’s *Kanthapura* (1938) is a seminal work of Indian English literature, notable for its use of a storytelling style reminiscent of the *Puranas* and its depiction of village life during the Indian freedom movement. The novel portrays the gradual politicization of a South Indian village, Kanthapura, and the impact of Gandhian ideals on its inhabitants. The statement posits that the ‘subaltern nature’ of Kanthapura is revealed when women, traditionally marginalized, step into positions of authority due to the men’s absence. This absence is not merely physical, but also symbolic of a disrupted social order, allowing for a temporary re-configuration of power dynamics. Examining this assertion requires understanding the concept of the subaltern and how Rao portrays the agency, or lack thereof, of the women in Kanthapura.

Understanding the Subaltern

The term ‘subaltern,’ popularized by Antonio Gramsci and further developed by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, refers to those groups in society who are marginalized and excluded from the dominant power structures. Spivak, in her influential essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” questions whether the subaltern can truly represent themselves, given the inherent power imbalances in knowledge production. In the context of *Kanthapura*, the villagers, particularly the women, can be considered subaltern, lacking direct access to political and economic power.

The Context of Male Absence

The men of Kanthapura are drawn into the freedom struggle, initially through peaceful protests inspired by Gandhi, and later through more radical actions leading to arrests and imprisonment. This physical removal of men from the village creates a significant void in the traditional social structure. The men’s absence isn’t simply a demographic shift; it disrupts the established patriarchal order where men held authority in public and economic spheres. This is particularly evident in the economic sphere, where women take on responsibilities like managing land and finances. For example, the novel details how women begin to contribute money to the Congress fund and participate in picketing, activities previously dominated by men.

Women Assuming Power: A Detailed Analysis

With the men gone, the women of Kanthapura begin to assume roles traditionally reserved for them. This isn’t a complete overthrow of patriarchal norms, but rather a shift in the locus of activity. They become the primary carriers of the nationalist message, organizing protests, and maintaining the village’s connection to the wider freedom movement. Characters like Achakka, a strong-willed and outspoken woman, emerge as leaders, mobilizing the women and influencing village decisions. The women’s power is largely exercised through collective action, particularly through the *bhagavatha melas* (religious performances) which become platforms for disseminating nationalist ideas.

Forms of Power Exercised by Women

  • Economic Power: Managing land, finances, and contributing to the Congress fund.
  • Social Power: Organizing protests, maintaining social cohesion, and influencing village opinion.
  • Moral Authority: The women’s perceived purity and devotion to Gandhi lend them moral weight in the community.

The ‘Subaltern Nature’ – A Critical Evaluation

However, the question of whether this assumption of power truly elevates the women out of their ‘subaltern’ status is complex. While they gain visibility and agency, their actions are often framed within the existing patriarchal context. Their power is largely derived from the absence of men, and it’s arguably a temporary phenomenon. Furthermore, their agency is often channeled through traditional roles – they are mothers, wives, and daughters first, and political actors second. Their motivations are frequently rooted in protecting their families and upholding community values, rather than a radical challenge to the social order. The novel also shows how the women’s power is ultimately limited by their dependence on male figures like Moorthy for guidance and legitimacy.

The tragedy of Kanthapura – its eventual destruction and abandonment – further underscores the precariousness of the women’s power. The village’s downfall is a result of external forces (the police and landlords) and internal divisions, highlighting the vulnerability of the subaltern in the face of systemic oppression. The women’s efforts, while significant, are ultimately insufficient to prevent the village’s demise.

Aspect Before Male Absence After Male Absence
Political Participation Limited, largely through supporting male relatives Increased, organizing protests and contributing to the freedom movement
Economic Control Minimal, dependent on male income Increased, managing land and finances
Social Influence Restricted to domestic sphere Expanded, influencing village opinion and decisions
Overall Power Subordinate to men Temporarily elevated, but still constrained by patriarchal norms

Conclusion

In conclusion, the statement that the subaltern nature of Kanthapura is revealed when women assume power in the absence of their men holds considerable truth. The novel vividly portrays how the disruption of the patriarchal order allows women to step into roles previously denied to them. However, this assumption of power is not a complete liberation. It remains contingent on the men’s absence, is often channeled through traditional roles, and ultimately proves insufficient to protect the village from destruction. Rao’s *Kanthapura* offers a nuanced depiction of gender dynamics and the complexities of subaltern agency within the context of the Indian freedom struggle, highlighting both the potential and the limitations of women’s empowerment.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Patriarchy
A social system in which males hold primary power and predominate in roles of political leadership, moral authority, social privilege and control of property.
Nationalism
Identification with one's own nation and support for its interests, especially to the exclusion or detriment of the interests of other nations.

Key Statistics

According to the 2011 Census of India, the female literacy rate was 65.46%, significantly lower than the male literacy rate of 82.14%.

Source: Census of India, 2011

In 1931, approximately 15% of the Indian population participated in the Civil Disobedience Movement led by Mahatma Gandhi.

Source: Bipan Chandra, India’s Struggle for Independence (1987)

Examples

Chipko Movement

The Chipko Movement (1973) in Uttarakhand, India, demonstrated the power of women in environmental activism. Women villagers hugged trees to prevent them from being felled, showcasing their agency in protecting their livelihoods and the environment.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was the portrayal of women in Kanthapura entirely positive?

No, Raja Rao’s portrayal is nuanced. While he highlights their strength and resilience, he also acknowledges their limitations and the constraints imposed by traditional social norms. The women are not presented as uniformly empowered figures.