Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Optical mineralogy, a crucial branch of petrography, utilizes the interaction of polarized light with minerals to identify and characterize them. When a mineral section appears dark under crossed polars, it indicates that the mineral is either isotropic or possesses a very low birefringence. However, distinguishing between these possibilities, and further determining if the mineral is uniaxial or biaxial, requires a systematic approach. This involves careful observation of the mineral’s behavior during rotation of the stage, assessment of its relief, and attempts to observe interference colors. The following outlines the procedures to differentiate between these optical characteristics.
Determining Isotropic, Uniaxial, or Biaxial Nature
A mineral section appearing dark under crossed polars suggests it either lacks interference colors (isotropic) or has very low birefringence. To differentiate, we proceed as follows:
(i) Identifying Isotropic Minerals
Isotropic minerals have refractive indices that are equal in all directions. Consequently, they do not split light into two rays and exhibit no interference colors. The procedure to confirm isotropy is:
- Rotation of Stage: Rotate the stage 360 degrees. If the mineral remains completely dark throughout the rotation, it is highly indicative of isotropy.
- Relief: Observe the relief (the apparent height of the mineral grain relative to surrounding materials). Isotropic minerals generally exhibit low relief.
- Becké Line: Attempt to observe a Becké line (a brightening at the edge of the grain when the focus is changed). Isotropic minerals will not show a Becké line.
Examples: Garnet, olivine, and pyrite are common isotropic minerals.
(ii) Identifying Uniaxial Minerals
Uniaxial minerals have one optic axis. They exhibit a single refractive index when light travels along this axis, but two refractive indices when light travels in other directions. The procedure to identify uniaxial minerals is:
- Rotation of Stage: Rotate the stage. If the mineral shows two dark bands (extinction positions) that are 90 degrees apart, it suggests uniaxiality.
- Interference Colors: Uniaxial minerals typically exhibit low to moderate interference colors.
- Optic Axis Figure: If the mineral is thick enough, an optic axis figure may be observed. This figure appears as a dark cross when the stage is rotated.
Note: Uniaxial minerals are further classified as either positive or negative, based on the orientation of the fast and slow rays relative to the optic axis. This requires more advanced techniques.
Examples: Calcite and aragonite are common uniaxial minerals.
(iii) Identifying Biaxial Minerals
Biaxial minerals have two optic axes. They split light into two rays, each with its own refractive index, regardless of the direction of travel. Identifying biaxial minerals when the section appears dark is more challenging. The procedure involves:
- Rotation of Stage: Rotate the stage. Biaxial minerals will exhibit two extinction positions, but they will not be 90 degrees apart. The angle between the extinction positions is related to the optic angle (2V).
- Interference Colors: Biaxial minerals generally exhibit higher interference colors than uniaxial minerals, even in low-birefringence cases.
- Optic Angle (2V): Determining the optic angle requires advanced techniques like Michel-Levy charts. However, if the 2V is small, the extinction angle will be small, and the mineral may appear nearly isotropic.
- Relief and Pleochroism: Biaxial minerals often exhibit moderate to high relief and may show pleochroism (different colors when viewed from different directions).
Examples: Feldspars, pyroxenes, and amphiboles are common biaxial minerals.
Table Summarizing Key Differences
| Property | Isotropic | Uniaxial | Biaxial |
|---|---|---|---|
| Optic Axes | None | One | Two |
| Extinction Positions | None (always dark) | 90 degrees | Not 90 degrees |
| Interference Colors | Absent | Low to Moderate | Moderate to High |
| Optic Axis Figure | Absent | Present (if thick) | Absent |
Conclusion
In conclusion, determining whether a mineral section appearing dark under crossed polars is isotropic, uniaxial, or biaxial requires a systematic approach involving stage rotation, relief assessment, and observation of interference colors. While isotropy is readily identified by the complete absence of interference colors and lack of response to stage rotation, differentiating between uniaxial and biaxial minerals necessitates careful observation of extinction positions and, in some cases, advanced techniques to determine the optic angle. Accurate identification is crucial for proper mineral identification and understanding the petrogenesis of rocks.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.