UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-I201615 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q23.

Is it true that the court intrigues and weak revenue system led to the collapse of the Maratha empire? Comment.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to the decline of the Maratha Empire. A simple 'yes' or 'no' answer is insufficient. The answer should acknowledge the importance of court intrigues and the weak revenue system, but also consider other contributing factors like Ahmad Shah Abdali’s invasions, the rise of regional powers, and the changing nature of warfare. Structure the answer by first outlining the state of the Maratha empire post-Aurangzeb, then detailing the impact of court intrigues, followed by the weaknesses in the revenue system, and finally, other contributing factors. A balanced conclusion is crucial.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

The Maratha Empire, born out of resistance to Mughal rule, rose to prominence in the 18th century, becoming a dominant force in the Indian subcontinent. Following the death of Aurangzeb in 1707, the Marathas expanded their influence, but this expansion was not without its challenges. By the late 18th and early 19th centuries, the empire had begun to decline, culminating in its eventual absorption into the British East India Company. While military defeats played a role, attributing the collapse solely to external factors would be an oversimplification. This answer will examine the extent to which court intrigues and a weak revenue system contributed to the downfall of the Maratha Empire, alongside other significant factors.

The Maratha Empire: A Post-Aurangzeb Assessment

After Aurangzeb’s death, the Marathas, under the Peshwas, transformed from a rebellious force into a centralized empire. The Peshwas consolidated power, expanding Maratha dominion across much of India. However, this expansion also sowed the seeds of future conflict and internal strife. The empire wasn’t a unified entity but a confederacy of semi-independent Maratha chiefs (Sardars) – Gaekwads, Holkars, Scindias, Bhonsles – who often prioritized their own interests over those of the central authority.

Court Intrigues and Internal Conflicts

Court intrigues were rampant within the Maratha administration, particularly after the death of Peshwa Balaji Baji Rao in 1761. The defeat at the Third Battle of Panipat against Ahmad Shah Abdali exposed the vulnerabilities of the Maratha army and triggered a power struggle for leadership.

  • The Rivalry between Raghunathrao and Madhavrao I: Raghunathrao, Balaji Baji Rao’s uncle, sought the Peshwaship, leading to a prolonged civil war with Madhavrao I. This internal conflict weakened the empire considerably, diverting resources and manpower.
  • The Rise of Nana Phadnavis: While Nana Phadnavis attempted to stabilize the situation, his efforts were hampered by the continued machinations of ambitious Sardars.
  • The Peshwa-Sardar Conflicts: The Peshwas increasingly clashed with the powerful Sardars, who resented attempts to curtail their autonomy. This led to fragmentation and a decline in central control. The Sardars often acted as independent rulers, prioritizing their regional interests.

These internal conflicts created a climate of instability and distrust, hindering effective governance and military preparedness.

Weaknesses in the Revenue System

The Maratha revenue system, while initially effective, suffered from several weaknesses that contributed to the empire’s decline.

  • Chauth and Sardeshmukhi: The Marathas relied heavily on Chauth (one-fourth of the land revenue) and Sardeshmukhi (an additional 10% of the land revenue) as sources of income. While lucrative, these levies often led to exploitation and resentment among the local population.
  • Lack of a Standardized System: The revenue system lacked standardization, with different officials employing varying methods of assessment and collection. This resulted in corruption and inefficiency.
  • Dependence on Local Agents: The Marathas often relied on local agents (Kamavisdars) to collect revenue, who frequently abused their power and siphoned off funds.
  • Failure to Promote Agriculture: The focus on extracting revenue rather than investing in agricultural development led to a decline in productivity and economic stagnation.

The inefficient and exploitative revenue system alienated the peasantry and hindered the empire’s economic growth, making it difficult to finance its military and administrative expenses.

Other Contributing Factors

While court intrigues and a weak revenue system were significant, other factors also played a crucial role in the Maratha Empire’s decline:

  • Ahmad Shah Abdali’s Invasions: The repeated invasions of Ahmad Shah Abdali, culminating in the devastating defeat at Panipat in 1761, severely weakened the Maratha military and prestige.
  • The Rise of Regional Powers: The emergence of powerful regional powers like the Sikhs, Rajputs, and the Nizam of Hyderabad challenged Maratha dominance.
  • The British East India Company: The growing power of the British East India Company posed the most significant threat. The British skillfully exploited the internal divisions within the Maratha Empire, forging alliances with disgruntled Sardars and gradually expanding their influence. The Anglo-Maratha Wars (1772-1783, 1803-1805, 1817-1819) ultimately led to the empire’s disintegration.
  • Changing Warfare Tactics: The Marathas’ traditional cavalry-based warfare proved increasingly ineffective against the British army’s modern infantry and artillery.
Factor Impact on Maratha Decline
Court Intrigues Weakened central authority, diverted resources, fostered instability.
Weak Revenue System Economic stagnation, alienated peasantry, hindered financial stability.
Ahmad Shah Abdali’s Invasions Military defeat, loss of prestige, exposed vulnerabilities.
British East India Company Exploited internal divisions, military superiority, gradual annexation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while court intrigues and a weak revenue system were undeniably significant factors contributing to the collapse of the Maratha Empire, they were not the sole causes. The empire’s decline was a complex process driven by a confluence of internal weaknesses and external pressures. The devastating defeat at Panipat, the rise of regional powers, and, most importantly, the relentless expansion of the British East India Company all played crucial roles. Attributing the downfall to any single factor would be a gross oversimplification of a multifaceted historical process. The Maratha Empire’s story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of internal division and the importance of adapting to changing geopolitical realities.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Chauth
A tax levied by the Marathas, amounting to one-fourth of the land revenue, collected from the territories under their control or influence.
Sardeshmukhi
An additional tax levied by the Marathas, amounting to 10% of the land revenue, collected from territories where they claimed sovereignty.

Key Statistics

By 1760, the Maratha Empire controlled approximately 27% of the Mughal Empire’s territory.

Source: Sardesai, G.S. (1946). The Maratha Revolution and the Agrarian Transition in Maharashtra.

The Maratha Empire’s revenue during its peak (mid-18th century) was estimated to be around 30 million pounds sterling (approximate conversion based on historical data).

Source: Kulke, H., & Rothermund, D. (1998). A History of India.

Examples

The Case of Sawai Madhavrao

Sawai Madhavrao Peshwa (1761-1772) attempted significant administrative and financial reforms to address the empire’s weaknesses, but his early death hampered these efforts and led to renewed internal conflicts.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was the Third Battle of Panipat the primary cause of the Maratha decline?

While Panipat was a devastating blow, it wasn’t the sole cause. It exposed existing weaknesses and accelerated the decline, but internal divisions, a flawed revenue system, and the rise of the British were equally important factors.

Topics Covered

Medieval HistoryPolitical HistoryMaratha EmpirePolitical IntrigueRevenue System