UPSC MainsHISTORY-PAPER-II201610 Marks
हिंदी में पढ़ें
Q28.

Outline the circumstances leading to Détente.

How to Approach

This question requires a nuanced understanding of the Cold War dynamics and the factors that led to a period of reduced tensions between the US and the Soviet Union. The answer should focus on the internal pressures within both superpowers, the external constraints, and the key events that facilitated Détente. A chronological approach, starting from the Cuban Missile Crisis and moving towards the SALT treaties, is recommended. Structure the answer into sections covering political, economic, and strategic factors.

Model Answer

0 min read

Introduction

Détente, a French term meaning ‘relaxation of tension’, refers to the period of improved relations between the United States and the Soviet Union during the 1960s and 70s. Emerging from the brinkmanship of the Cold War, particularly the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, Détente represented a shift from confrontation to negotiation. While ideological differences remained, both superpowers recognized the catastrophic potential of nuclear war and the economic strains of an escalating arms race. This period witnessed increased diplomatic contact, arms control agreements, and expanded trade, fundamentally altering the landscape of international relations.

Political Circumstances

The Cuban Missile Crisis (1962) served as a stark warning of the dangers of nuclear escalation. The near-miss prompted both John F. Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev to seek ways to reduce the risk of future confrontations. Kennedy, facing domestic criticism and a narrow victory in the crisis, sought to avoid direct military clashes. Khrushchev, similarly, faced internal opposition after the perceived humiliation of backing down.

  • Leadership Changes: The succession of Leonid Brezhnev in 1964 in the Soviet Union and the assassination of John F. Kennedy in 1963, followed by Lyndon B. Johnson’s presidency, brought new perspectives to the relationship. Johnson, preoccupied with the Vietnam War, sought to limit the scope of potential conflicts.
  • Domestic Pressures: The US was grappling with the Vietnam War protests and growing anti-war sentiment. The Soviet Union faced economic stagnation and internal dissent. Both nations needed a period of stability to address domestic issues.
  • Non-Aligned Movement: The growing influence of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), formed in 1961, put pressure on both superpowers to engage in dialogue and reduce tensions to avoid alienating newly independent nations.

Economic Circumstances

The economic costs of the Cold War were becoming increasingly burdensome for both the US and the Soviet Union. The arms race diverted resources from domestic priorities, and maintaining a global military presence was expensive.

  • Soviet Economic Weakness: The Soviet economy struggled to compete with the US in terms of innovation and consumer goods production. The need for Western technology and grain became increasingly apparent.
  • US Economic Strain: The Vietnam War and social programs like the ‘Great Society’ placed a significant strain on the US economy, leading to inflation and budgetary deficits. Reducing military spending became a desirable goal.
  • Trade Opportunities: Both sides recognized the potential benefits of increased trade. The US saw opportunities to export goods to the Soviet Union, while the Soviets sought access to Western technology.

Strategic Circumstances

The development of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) doctrine, where a nuclear attack by one superpower would inevitably lead to retaliation and destruction of both, created a strategic stalemate. This realization fostered a sense of caution and a desire to manage the risks of nuclear war.

  • Nuclear Parity: By the late 1960s, the Soviet Union had achieved a degree of nuclear parity with the US, making a first strike less feasible and increasing the deterrent effect.
  • Sino-Soviet Split: The growing rift between China and the Soviet Union created a strategic opportunity for the US to exploit. Improving relations with the Soviet Union could potentially isolate China.
  • Arms Control Negotiations: The Strategic Arms Limitation Talks (SALT I) began in 1969, leading to the signing of the SALT I treaty in 1972. This treaty limited the deployment of anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems and froze the number of strategic ballistic missile launchers.

Key Events Facilitating Détente

  • Hotline Agreement (1963): Established a direct communication link between Washington and Moscow to reduce the risk of accidental war.
  • Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (1963): Prohibited nuclear weapon tests in the atmosphere, outer space, and underwater.
  • Moscow Summit (1972): Nixon’s visit to Moscow resulted in the signing of SALT I and a joint communiqué outlining principles for future relations.
  • Helsinki Accords (1975): Recognized the post-World War II borders in Europe and committed signatories to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Agreement/Event Year Significance
Hotline Agreement 1963 Reduced risk of accidental war through direct communication.
Nuclear Test Ban Treaty 1963 Limited nuclear testing, reducing atmospheric contamination.
SALT I 1972 Limited strategic arms, marking a significant step in arms control.
Helsinki Accords 1975 Recognized European borders and promoted human rights.

Conclusion

Détente was a complex period driven by a confluence of political, economic, and strategic factors. While it did not end the Cold War, it significantly reduced the risk of nuclear conflict and fostered a more predictable relationship between the US and the Soviet Union. However, Détente was not without its limitations and faced challenges from hardliners on both sides, ultimately giving way to a renewed period of tension in the late 1970s with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Nevertheless, the period remains a crucial example of how even during periods of intense ideological rivalry, pragmatic considerations can lead to cooperation and a lessening of global tensions.

Answer Length

This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.

Additional Resources

Key Definitions

Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)
A doctrine of military strategy and national security policy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two opposing sides would result in the complete annihilation of both the attacker and the defender.
Brinkmanship
The practice of pushing dangerous events to the verge of disaster in order to achieve the most advantageous outcome.

Key Statistics

US military spending peaked in 1967 at 14.2% of GDP during the Vietnam War. (Source: Office of Economic Analysis, US Bureau of Economic Analysis, as of knowledge cutoff 2023)

Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

Soviet grain imports from the US increased significantly during the Détente period, reaching a peak of 11.5 million metric tons in 1972. (Source: USDA Economic Research Service, as of knowledge cutoff 2023)

Source: USDA Economic Research Service

Examples

The Ping Pong Diplomacy

In 1971, the US table tennis team was invited to play in China, marking a significant thaw in relations between the two countries. This event, known as "Ping Pong Diplomacy," paved the way for Nixon's historic visit to China in 1972.

Frequently Asked Questions

Was Détente a success or a failure?

Détente was a mixed bag. It successfully reduced the risk of nuclear war and fostered some cooperation, but it did not resolve the underlying ideological differences between the US and the Soviet Union. It ultimately collapsed with the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, but its legacy remains significant.

Topics Covered

HistoryWorld HistoryInternational RelationsCold WarUS-Soviet RelationsDiplomacyArms Control