Model Answer
0 min readIntroduction
Linear Programming (LP) is a mathematical technique used to optimize an objective function, subject to a set of constraints. It is widely applied in resource allocation, production planning, and various other managerial decision-making processes. In the context of manufacturing, LP helps determine the optimal product mix to maximize profit, given limited resources like labor and testing facilities. This problem exemplifies a classic application of LP, where a company aims to maximize its profit by deciding the number of deluxe and standard machines to produce, considering the available resources and market demand.
Formulation of the Linear Programming Problem
Let:
- x = Number of deluxe machines produced
- y = Number of standard machines produced
Objective Function:
The objective is to maximize the total profit (Z). The profit function is:
Maximize Z = 450x + 250y
Constraints:
- Labor Constraint: 18x + 3y ≤ 800 (Total labor hours available)
- Testing Constraint: 8x + 4y ≤ 600 (Total testing hours available)
- Demand Constraint: y ≥ 150 (Minimum demand for standard machines)
- Non-negativity Constraints: x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0 (Production cannot be negative)
Solving the Linear Programming Problem (Graphical Method)
To solve this LPP graphically, we need to plot the constraints on a graph and identify the feasible region. The optimal solution will lie at one of the corner points of the feasible region.
Step 1: Plotting the Constraints
- 18x + 3y = 800: When x=0, y = 800/3 ≈ 266.67. When y=0, x = 800/18 ≈ 44.44.
- 8x + 4y = 600: When x=0, y = 600/4 = 150. When y=0, x = 600/8 = 75.
- y = 150: A horizontal line at y = 150.
- x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0: Restricts the solution to the first quadrant.
Step 2: Identifying the Feasible Region
The feasible region is the area that satisfies all the constraints simultaneously. It is bounded by the lines representing the constraints.
Step 3: Finding the Corner Points of the Feasible Region
The corner points are the intersection points of the constraint lines. We need to find the coordinates of these points.
- A: (0, 150) - Intersection of y = 150 and x = 0
- B: (0, 266.67) - Intersection of 18x + 3y = 800 and x = 0
- C: Intersection of 18x + 3y = 800 and 8x + 4y = 600
Solving these two equations simultaneously:
Multiply the first equation by 4 and the second by 3:
72x + 12y = 3200
24x + 12y = 1800
Subtracting the second equation from the first:
48x = 1400
x = 1400/48 ≈ 29.17
Substituting x in 8x + 4y = 600:
8(29.17) + 4y = 600
233.36 + 4y = 600
4y = 366.64
y = 91.66
However, this point does not satisfy y ≥ 150. Therefore, we need to find the intersection of 8x + 4y = 600 and y = 150.
8x + 4(150) = 600
8x + 600 = 600
8x = 0
x = 0
This gives us point A again. Let's find the intersection of 18x + 3y = 800 and y = 150.
18x + 3(150) = 800
18x + 450 = 800
18x = 350
x = 350/18 ≈ 19.44
So, C: (19.44, 150)
- D: Intersection of 8x + 4y = 600 and x = 0 - This is point B.
Step 4: Evaluating the Objective Function at the Corner Points
We evaluate the objective function Z = 450x + 250y at each corner point:
- A (0, 150): Z = 450(0) + 250(150) = 37500
- C (19.44, 150): Z = 450(19.44) + 250(150) = 8748 + 37500 = 46248
Since we are dealing with production quantities, we need to consider integer solutions. We can round the values of x and y to the nearest integers and check if they satisfy the constraints. Let's try x = 19 and y = 150.
18(19) + 3(150) = 342 + 450 = 792 ≤ 800
8(19) + 4(150) = 152 + 600 = 752 > 600. This doesn't satisfy the testing constraint.
Let's try x = 18 and y = 150.
18(18) + 3(150) = 324 + 450 = 774 ≤ 800
8(18) + 4(150) = 144 + 600 = 744 > 600. This doesn't satisfy the testing constraint.
Let's consider the intersection of 8x + 4y = 600 and y = 150, which gives x = 0. Then Z = 37500.
Let's try to maximize x while satisfying the testing constraint. If y = 150, then 8x = 0, so x = 0. If we reduce y, we can increase x. Let's try y = 151. Then 8x + 4(151) = 600, so 8x = -4, which is not possible.
Therefore, the optimal solution is approximately x = 19.44 and y = 150. Since we need integer solutions, we can consider x = 19 and y = 150, but it violates the testing constraint. The best integer solution is likely x = 0 and y = 150, giving a profit of 37500.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the company should produce 0 deluxe machines and 150 standard machines to maximize its profit, given the constraints on labor hours, testing hours, and minimum demand for standard machines. While the initial LPP solution suggested a fractional value for deluxe machines, the integer constraint necessitates rounding down, leading to a slightly lower, but feasible, profit. This demonstrates the practical application of linear programming in optimizing production plans and resource allocation.
Answer Length
This is a comprehensive model answer for learning purposes and may exceed the word limit. In the exam, always adhere to the prescribed word count.